CTRI Number |
CTRI/2021/01/030695 [Registered on: 22/01/2021] Trial Registered Prospectively |
Last Modified On: |
29/08/2023 |
Post Graduate Thesis |
No |
Type of Trial |
Interventional |
Type of Study
|
Diagnostic Preventive Screening Process of Care Changes Behavioral |
Study Design |
Other |
Public Title of Study
|
Labour Care Guide Trial for reducing Caesarean Section in India |
Scientific Title of Study
|
Implementing the WHO Labour Care Guide to reduce the use of Caesarean section in four hospitals in India: a pragmatic, stepped wedge, cluster randomized pilot trial |
Secondary IDs if Any
|
Secondary ID |
Registry |
NIL |
NIL |
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
Modification(s)
|
Name |
Dr Shivaprasad S Goudar |
Address |
Department of Physiology KAHERs J N Medical College Nehru Nagar Belgaum Principal Investigator Womens and Childrens Health Research Unit Wing Belgaum
Belgaum KARNATAKA 590010 India |
Phone |
9448126371 |
Fax |
8312472891 |
Email |
sgoudar@jnmc.edu |
|
Details Contact Person Scientific Query
|
Name |
Dr Yeshita V Pujar |
Address |
Department of OBGYN, First floor KAHERs J N Medical College Nehru Nagar Belgaum
Belgaum KARNATAKA 590010 India |
Phone |
9448142989 |
Fax |
8312472891 |
Email |
yvpujar@hotmail.com |
|
Details Contact Person Public Query
|
Name |
Dr Yeshita V Pujar |
Address |
Department of OBGYN, First floor KAHERs J N Medical College Nehru Nagar Belgaum
KARNATAKA 590010 India |
Phone |
9448142989 |
Fax |
8312472891 |
Email |
yvpujar@hotmail.com |
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
Modification(s)
|
KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research (Deemed-to-be-University) Belagavi |
|
Primary Sponsor
|
Name |
Bill Melinda Gates Foundation |
Address |
440 5th Ave N. Seattle, WA 98109 USA |
Type of Sponsor |
Other [Charitable Foundation] |
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
Sites of Study
|
No of Sites = 4 |
Contact Person |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
Dr Jayashree A K |
Gadag Institute of Medical sciences and Hospital |
Department of OBGYN, SH 6, Malasamudra, Gadag 582103 Belgaum |
9480384328
jayashreeashokkumar@gmail.com |
Dr Raveendra Anteen |
General Hospital, Gokak, Belagavi. |
Chief Medical Officer, Maternal and Child Block, Taluka Hospital, Gokak Belgaum |
9743310006
anteendrraveendra@yahoo.com |
Dr Suman S Gaddi |
Vijayanagar Institute of Medical Sciences and Hospital |
Department of OBGYN, Vijaya Nagar, Cantonment, Ballari, 583104 Belgaum |
9880190927
yourashirwad@gmail.com |
Dr Shukla Shetty |
Women and Child Hospital affiliated to JJM Medical College, Davanagere |
Department of OBGYN, JJM Medical College, Medical College Rd, MCC B Block, Kuvempu Nagar, Davanagere Belgaum |
9945459000
shukla.shetty@yahoo.com |
|
Details of Ethics Committee
Modification(s)
|
No of Ethics Committees= 4 |
Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
Institutional Ethics Committee JJM Medical College Davangere |
Approved |
Institutional Ethics Committee, Gadag Institute of Medical Sciences and Hospital |
Approved |
Institutional Ethics Committee, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belagavi |
Approved |
Institutional Ethics Committee, Vijayanagara Institute of Medical Sciences and Hospital |
Approved |
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
Health Type |
Condition |
Patients |
Encounter for screening, unspecified |
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
Type |
Name |
Details |
Intervention |
Co-designed implementation strategy targeting healthcare providers to improve intrapartum care |
The strategy will target the use of the LCG by maternity care providers, as well as promoting audit and feedback using the Robson Classification. |
Comparator Agent |
Control: Standard of care |
Usual care with dissemination of the WHO 2018 intrapartum care guideline. |
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
Age From |
18.00 Year(s) |
Age To |
70.00 Year(s) |
Gender |
Both |
Details |
Cluster: Health facility is the randomization unit.
Participating clusters (formative phase and trial phase) are four public hospitals in India. Across these hospitals, the mean CS rate is ≥30%
Healthcare providers attending childbirth will be the target of the intervention. |
|
ExclusionCriteria |
Details |
Facilities with C Section rate less than 30% |
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Computer generated randomization |
Method of Concealment
|
Not Applicable |
Blinding/Masking
|
Not Applicable |
Primary Outcome
Modification(s)
|
Outcome |
TimePoints |
Use of CS amongst women in Robson Group 1 (i.e. women who are nulliparous, singleton, cephalic, ≥37 weeks’ gestation, in spontaneous labour). |
At discharge from the facility |
|
Secondary Outcome
Modification(s)
|
Outcome |
TimePoints |
Fetal / Neonatal outcomes 1. Antepartum stillbirth (Fetal death prior to admission)
2. Intrapartum stillbirth
3. Neonatal death (Neonatal death in a liveborn infant by day 7 or discharge, whichever came first)
|
At discharge from the facility |
Maternal outcomes
1. CS rate in women in Robson Groups 1 and 2
2. CS rate in women in Robson Groups 1 to 5
3. Overall CS rate
4. Augmentation with oxytocin during labour rate
5. Early artificial rupture of the membranes rate
6. Episiotomy rate
7. Operative vaginal birth rate
8. Duration of hospital admission |
At discharge from the facility |
Women’s experience outcomes 1. Woman’s experience with labour companion
2. Woman’s experience of coping with pain
3. Woman’s experience of offering oral fluids
4. Woman’s experience of mobilising during labour
5. Woman’s experience of birth position of choice
6. Woman’s experience of time health worker spent with them
7. Woman’s experience of privacy
8. Woman’s overall experience of care
|
At discharge from the facility |
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="25000" Sample Size from India="25000" |
Phase of Trial
|
N/A |
Date of First Enrollment (India)
Modification(s)
|
01/03/2021 |
Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
No Date Specified |
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="2" Months="0" Days="0" |
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
Modification(s)
|
Not Applicable |
Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Closed to Recruitment of Participants |
Publication Details
Modification(s)
|
NIL |
Brief Summary
Modification(s)
|
Background: The WHO Labour Care Guide (LCG) is a clinical tool that reflects WHO’s latest guidelines for effective, respectful care during labour and childbirth. Implementing the LCG into routine care requires a strategy that effectively improves healthcare provider practices around intrapartum care. Such a strategy may optimize the use of Caesarean section, along with other health and women’s experience of care outcomes. However, the effects of such a strategy have not been evaluated in a randomised trial. This study aims to: 1. Develop and optimise a strategy for implementing the LCG (formative phase) 2. To evaluate the implementation of the LCG strategy compared with usual care (pilot trial phase) Primary objective: 1. Evaluate the effect of operationalisation of the LCG implementation strategy on CS rate amongst women in Robson Group 1 Secondary objectives: 2. 2. Evaluate the effect of the LCG implementation strategy on women’s health and process of care outcomes and women’s experiences of care 3. 3. Conduct a process evaluation on the implementation of the LCG strategy Study design: stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized controlled pilot trial. Setting: Four public hospitals in India. Population: Cluster: Health facility is the randomization unit. Healthcare providers attending childbirth will be the target of the intervention. Intervention: Co-designed implementation strategy targeting healthcare providers to improve intrapartum care. Control: Usual care (use of simplified partograph). Outcomes Primary outcome The primary outcome is the use of CS amongst women in Robson Group 1 (i.e. women who are nulliparous, singleton, cephalic, ≥37 weeks’ gestation, in spontaneous labour). Secondary Outcomes
Category
|
Outcome
|
Outcome definition
|
Maternal
outcomes
|
CS
rate in women in Robson Groups 1 and 3
|
Numerator:
Number of women undergoing CS
Denominator:
Number of women in Robson Groups 1 and 2
|
CS
rate in women in Robson Groups 1 to 5
|
Numerator:
Number of women undergoing CS
Denominator:
Number of women in Robson Groups 1 to 5
|
Overall
CS rate
|
Numerator:
Number of women undergoing CS
Denominator:
Number of women giving birth
|
Augmentation
with oxytocin during labour rate
|
Numerator:
Number of women given oxytocin for augmentation during labour
Denominator:
number of women who experienced spontaneous labour
|
Artificial
rupture of the membranes rate
|
Numerator:
Number of women who had artificial rupture of membranes
Denominator:
number of women who experienced spontaneous labour
|
Episiotomy
rate
|
Numerator:
Number of women who had episiotomy
Denominator:
number of women with vaginal birth
|
Operative
vaginal birth rate
|
Numerator:
Number of women who had operative vaginal birth (forceps or vacuum)
Denominator:
number of women with vaginal birth
|
Duration
of hospital admission
|
Total
length (hours) of hospital admission for childbirth
|
3rd
or 4th degree tears
|
Numerator:
Number of women experiencing 3rd or 4th degree tears
Denominator:
number of women giving birth
|
PPH
requiring uterine balloon tamponade or surgical intervention
|
Numerator:
Number of women requiring uterine balloon tamponade OR surgical intervention
for PPH
Denominator:
number of women giving birth
|
Suspected
or confirmed maternal infection requiring therapeutic antibiotics
|
Numerator:
Number of women with clinical signs or symptoms of maternal infection AND
therapeutic antibiotics were required
Denominator:
number of women giving birth
|
Fetal
/ Neonatal outcomes
|
Antepartum
stillbirth
|
Numerator:
Fetal death prior to admission
Denominator:
All born babies
|
Intrapartum
stillbirth
|
Numerator:
Fetal death after admission
Denominator:
All born babies
|
Apgar
score <7 at 5 minutes
|
Numerator:
Liveborn babies with Apgar <7 at 5 minutes
Denominator:
Liveborn babies
|
Bag
and mask ventilation of newborn
|
Numerator:
Use of continuous bag and mask ventilation of newborn for >1 minute
Denominator:
liveborn babies
|
Mechanical
ventilation of newborn
|
Numerator:
Use of mechanical ventilation of newborn
Denominator:
liveborn babies
|
Prolonged
(>48 hour) admission in NICU
|
Numerator:
Admission to NICU for >48 hours
Denominator:
liveborn babies
|
Newborns
requiring NICU admission for hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy
|
Numerator:
Admission to NICU for suspected or confirmed
Denominator:
liveborn babies
|
Neonatal
death
|
Numerator:
Neonatal death in a liveborn infant by day 7 or discharge (whichever came
first)
Denominator:
all liveborn babies
|
Women’s
experience outcomes
|
Woman’s
experience with labour companion
|
Numerator:
Women who reported a labour companion was present during labour or birth
Denominator:
Women in Robson Group 1 or 3 who complete postpartum survey
|
Woman’s
experience of being offered pain relief (2
outcomes)
|
Numerator:
women who reported that they were asked whether they would like any pain
relief
Denominator:
Women in Robson Group 1 or 3 who complete postpartum survey
Numerator:
Women who reported being very satisfied or somewhat satisfied with how their
pain was managed during labour and birth
Denominator:
Women in Robson Group 1 or 3 who complete postpartum survey
|
Woman’s
experience of being encouraged to drink oral fluids
|
Numerator:
Women who reported that a health worker encouraged them to drink water
Denominator:
Women in Robson Group 1 or 3 who complete postpartum survey
|
Woman’s
experience of being encouraged to eat food
|
Numerator:
Women who reported that a health worker encouraged them to eat food
Denominator:
Women in Robson Group 1 or 3 who complete postpartum survey
|
Woman’s
experience of mobilising during labour
|
Numerator:
Women who reported that a health worker encouraged them to walk around during
labour
Denominator:
Women in Robson Group 1 or 3
|
Woman’s
experience of birth position of choice
|
Numerator:
Women who reported that a health worker asked them which birth position they
preferred
Denominator:
Women in Robson Group 1 or 3 who complete postpartum survey
|
Woman’s
experience of time health worker spent with them
|
Numerator:
Women who reported being very satisfied or somewhat satisfied with amount of
time health worker spent with them during labour
Denominator:
Women in Robson Group 1 or 3 who complete postpartum survey
|
Women’s
satisfaction with the way health providers communicated with them
|
Numerator:
Women who reported being very satisfied or somewhat satisfied with the way health
workers communicated with them during labour and birth
Denominator:
Women in Robson Group 1 or 3 who complete postpartum survey
|
Woman’s
experience of privacy
|
Numerator:
number of women who strongly agreed or agreed that their privacy was
respected during examinations and treatments
Denominator:
Women in Robson Group 1 or 3 who complete postpartum survey
|
Women’s
experience of being asked permission
|
Numerator:
number of women who said their health worker always asked permission before
examinations and treatments
Denominator:
Women in Robson Group 1 or 3 who complete postpartum survey
|
Woman’s
overall experience of care
|
Numerator:
number of women who strongly agreed or agreed that they felt satisfied with
their labour and birth experience
Denominator:
Women in Robson Group 1 or 3 who complete postpartum survey
|
Randomization: The intervention will be implemented in labour wards of four hospitals in India in a stepped-wedge, randomized cluster design. All four hospitals will initially be observed under usual care for two months, with the intervention rolled out sequentially (in random order) over a 12-month period, with a hospital transitioning to the intervention every 2 months. A half-month transition period is included for each hospital to allow for the intervention to be fully adopted. Sample size: In the control group, the CS rate in women in Robson group 1 is estimated at 40%. Four hospitals attending 300 women in Robson Group 1 per step will provide 92% power to detect a reduction to 30% (25% relative reduction) (ICC 0.02). Statistical analysis: The analysis will be by intention-to-treat, with rates and 95% CIs calculated for all outcomes. The primary comparison will be composed by the characteristics of the women enrolled at the control period versus those enrolled at the intervention period. For the primary outcome and secondary outcomes a multilevel logistic regression model will be used to estimate effects. |