| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2024/02/062610 [Registered on: 14/02/2024] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
08/02/2024 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
No |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Physiotherapy (Not Including YOGA) Behavioral |
| Study Design |
Randomized, Parallel Group, Active Controlled Trial |
|
Public Title of Study
|
Development of New teaching methodology for slow learners |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
Development and Validation of Novel Educational Framework and its Effectiveness on Academic Proficiency in Undergraduate Physiotherapy Students |
| Trial Acronym |
NIL |
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
Rakesh Krishna Kovela |
| Designation |
Associate Professor, PhD Scholar |
| Affiliation |
Nitte Institute of Physiotherapy, NITTE(Deemed to be University). |
| Address |
Department of Physiotherapy, Room Number 20, Second base division, Nitte Institute of Physiotherapy, NITTE(Deemed to be University), Deralakatte, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India.
Dakshina Kannada KARNATAKA 575018 India |
| Phone |
7204346274 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
rakesh.krishna@nitte.edu.in |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Dhanesh Kumar K U |
| Designation |
Professor and Principal |
| Affiliation |
Nitte Institute of Physiotherapy, NITTE(Deemed to be University) |
| Address |
Department of Physiotherapy, Room Number 20, Second base division, Nitte Institute of Physiotherapy, NITTE(Deemed to be University), Deralakatte, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India.
Dakshina Kannada KARNATAKA 575018 India |
| Phone |
9019431417 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
principal.nipt@nitte.edu.in |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Dhanesh Kumar K U |
| Designation |
Professor and Principal |
| Affiliation |
Nitte Institute of Physiotherapy, NITTE(Deemed to be University) |
| Address |
Department of Physiotherapy, Room Number 20, Second base division, Nitte Institute of Physiotherapy, NITTE(Deemed to be University), Deralakatte, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India.
Dakshina Kannada KARNATAKA 575018 India |
| Phone |
9019431417 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
principal.nipt@nitte.edu.in |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
| Nitte Institute of Physiotherapy, Nitte(Deemed to be University) will provide basic Infrastructure Facilities. No other monitory support is required |
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
Nitte Institute of Physiotherapy(NITTE Deemed to be University) |
| Address |
Nitte Institute of Physiotherapy, Deralakatte, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India |
| Type of Sponsor |
Other [Constituent Physiotherapy Institute of NITTE(Deemed to be University)] |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Dr Rakesh Krishna Kovela |
Nitte Institute of Physiotherapy |
Patanjali Hall, First Floor, Nitte Institute of Physiotherapy, NITTE(Deemed to be University), Deralakatte, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India Dakshina Kannada KARNATAKA |
7204346274
rakesh.krishna@nitte.edu.in |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| Central Ethics Committe, NITTE (Deemed to be University) |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Healthy Human Volunteers |
Students Pursuing Physiotherapy Profession |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Intervention |
Novel Educational Framework |
1. How the changes in the life impacts studies/education. 2. capability to correlate physiotherapy theory and practice. 3. Capability of self-directed learning. 4. Ability to critically analyze. 5. Ability to map concepts and working towards expertise. The research scholar will be the first point of contact for any query throughout the study. The final domains and how they reflect in students will be developed after FGD. The intervention duration is 1 hour per day, four days a week for 4 weeks |
| Comparator Agent |
Traditional Remedial coaching |
Remedial coaching will be given to the students on the basis of the following
a. Divide the class into small, carefully chosen groups.
b. Provide a wide variety of activities, such as free access to library, books, articles etc.
b. Pay close attention to how the materials are prepared.
d. Let smarter students assist less intelligent ones.
b. Encourage students to take part in planning events.
g. Provide as much freedom within the predetermined boundaries as possible.
g. Be flexible and take the advice of the students.
h. Pay attention to how students respond.
i. Try to obtain parental cooperation. The intervention duration is 1 hour per day, four days a week for 4 weeks
|
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
18.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
25.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Both |
| Details |
1. Semester I to Semester V Undergraduate students of age 18 years and above of either gender who gives consent and qualifying Potential learner policy of Nitte institute of physiotherapy. (Phase III Experimental phase)
a. Attendance: Students with less than 75% attendance at the end of first term/first internal and failed in any subjects
b. Examination: Students who score less than 50% in first term/first internal examination at least in one subject
c. Mentors: Identifying potential learners through mentors of the institute
d. Students Guidance clinic/ Student wellness center: Identifying slow/potential learners through student wellness center based on the referral by mentor/coordinator/HOI. Involved in ruling out established diagnosis like ADHD and learning disorders
|
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
1. Students who are suffering with conditions like ADHD and Learning disorders |
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Computer generated randomization |
|
Method of Concealment
|
Sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Outcome Assessor Blinded |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| Academic Proficiency through 1. Comparing first and second Sessional marks. 2. Attendance percentage before first sessional and between first and second sessional. 3. Average Learning Gain |
Pre and post measurement of Outcome. One day one and at the end of fourth week |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| Concentration, Anxiety and Attention span scale (CAAS). |
Pre and post measurement of Outcome. One day one and at the end of fourth week |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="30" Sample Size from India="30"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
N/A |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
02/04/2024 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="2" Months="6" Days="0" |
|
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
|
Not Applicable |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Not Yet Recruiting |
|
Publication Details
|
N/A |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
Response - NO
|
|
Brief Summary
|
Educational
framework with structured methodology and uniform guidelines exclusively for
potential learners is least touched in higher education system exclusively in
medical and healthcare education. After the incorporation of competency based
medical education system in Indian scenario there is more scope for learning in
a learner’s perspective. But, when it comes for a potential learner the exact
mechanism to be followed for improving the interest, capability and capacity of
the student is not explored. In Physiotherapy profession because of lack of
central council, competency-based framework, exclusive guidelines, methodologies,
incorporating the additional coaching in regular time table are the vital
reasons behind Potential learners in any academic institute. It is not only a
burden to student economically, but also restricts his and institute’s growth
if left untouched. Thus, there is an utmost important need to develop a Novel structural
educational framework which can help student as well as teacher to cope up with
their problems in physiotherapy education to improve academic proficiency as
well as improve their concentration, attention and reducing anxiety. The aim of the present study is to
Develop and Validate Novel Educational Framework and Determine its
Effectiveness on Academic Proficiency in Undergraduate Physiotherapy students Objectives: Primary
objectives: 1. To
Develop, the Novel Educational Framework for undergraduate
Potential learners pursuing physiotherapy through focused group discussion
method with students and faculties 2. To
Content validate the developed framework using CVI by experts in physiotherapy
education 3. To
find the effectiveness of Novel Educational Framework in comparison to traditional
remedial coaching on Academic Proficiency in Potential learners Pursuing Physiotherapy
Secondary
Objectives:
1. To
find the effectiveness of Novel Educational framework on Concentration, Anxiety
and Attention using CAAS scale (Concentration, anxiety and attention scale) Annexure
III Me Methodology: The study will be conducted in three phases. In first phase the novel educational framework will be prepared through focused group discussion method on students and facultys. the developed framework will be validated in second phase through content validation. Effectiveness of Novel educational framework will be determined in third phase by comparing with traditional remedial coaching. The final sample size for phase III will be determined after pilot testing on 30 samples. Physiotherapy students who are facing issues in academics and fulfilling the remedial policy are included in the trial. This study will not disturb the regular academic curriculum. Study will be implemented only between formative exams.
Significance of the study: Potential learners are neglected in higher education because of lack
of structured methodology. This study will be helpful in developing a Novel
educational framework and also helps in analyzing and assessing the potential
learner. Once the framework is developed, it will be validated and its
effectiveness will be evaluated in comparison to traditional remedial coaching.
Even though remedial coaching is very well established and used by most of the
universities, the main lacunae are every teacher will be different in the way
their approach towards remedial coaching. If an established structured plan is
prepared it can be a valuable source for overcoming the problems faced by
Potential learners and as well as teachers. Intervention will be given to the control group if
positive outcomes is observed. |