| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2024/01/061609 [Registered on: 18/01/2024] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
10/04/2024 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
No |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Radiation Therapy |
| Study Design |
Randomized, Parallel Group Trial |
|
Public Title of Study
|
A clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of radiation therapy in inoperable gall bladder cancer. |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
Systemic therapy with or without radiation therapy in unresectable non metastatic gall bladder carcinoma open label parallel arm phase 2 phase 3 integrated randomized clinical trial (RUGB) |
| Trial Acronym |
RUGB |
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
Dr Shivakumar Gudi |
| Designation |
Assistant Professor, Radiation Oncology |
| Affiliation |
Tata Memorial Centre |
| Address |
Department of radiation oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, 10th floor, room no-1002, Dr Ernest Borges Marg Parel, Mumbai
Mumbai MAHARASHTRA 400012 India |
| Phone |
02224176863 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
shivakumargudi@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Dr Shivakumar Gudi |
| Designation |
Assistant Professor, Radiation Oncology |
| Affiliation |
Tata Memorial Centre |
| Address |
Department of radiation oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, 10th floor, room no-1002, Dr Ernest Borges Marg Parel, Mumbai
Mumbai MAHARASHTRA 400012 India |
| Phone |
02224176863 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
shivakumargudi@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Dr Shivakumar Gudi |
| Designation |
Assistant Professor, Radiation Oncology |
| Affiliation |
Tata Memorial Centre |
| Address |
Department of radiation oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, 10th floor, room no-1002, Dr Ernest Borges Marg Parel, Mumbai
Mumbai MAHARASHTRA 400012 India |
| Phone |
02224176863 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
shivakumargudi@gmail.com |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
| Intramural funding, tata memorial hospitaldr ernest borges marg parel mumbai 400012 |
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
Tata Memorial Hospital |
| Address |
Dr Ernest Borges Marg Parel Mumbai 400012 |
| Type of Sponsor |
Research institution and hospital |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Dr Shivakumar Gudi |
Tata Memorial Hospital |
Department of radiation oncology 10th floor, Room no 1002, Tata Memorial Hospital, Dr Ernest Borges Marg Parel Mumbai MAHARASHTRA |
02224176863
shivakumargudi@gmail.com |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| Institutional Ethics Committee |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Patients |
(1) ICD-10 Condition: C23||Malignant neoplasm of gallbladder, |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Intervention |
Radiotherapy and Systemic therapy |
Participants will receive radiation therapy in addition to systemic therapy Hypofractionated external image guided radiation to a dose of 40-55Gy in 10 sessions
(up to 60Gy in 15 sessions) over 2-3 weeks
- This is followed by systemic therapy as in the Systemic therapy arm |
| Comparator Agent |
Systemic Therapy |
Participants will receive one of the following
Gemcitabine-based systemic therapy alone
1 Gemcitabine plus cisplatin
2 Gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin
3 Gemcitabine plus cisplatin plus Durvalumab
4 Gemcitabine plus cisplatin plus nab-paclitaxel
Duration- 3 months (in addition to 3 months previously received) |
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
18.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
85.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Both |
| Details |
1 Histologically proven biopsy or cytology adenocarcinoma of gall
bladder. Gall bladder neck primaries with hilar block mimicking hilar
cholangiocarcinoma will also be included
2 Non metastatic at presentation as determined using cross sectional
imaging and diagnostic laparoscopy if done as a part of standard work up
recommended in the joint clinic
3 Locally advanced disease with one or more of the following
4 Extensive liver infiltration not amenable for surgery but feasible for safe
radiation delivery -Liver minus gross tumor volume at least 700cc
5 Vascular involvement encasement more than 180-degree angle of one of the
vessels Hepatic artery main portal vein right or left portal vein
6 Obstructive jaundice with hilar involvement (type 2 non communicating
block and higher blocks as per Bismuth-Corlette classification)
7 Stable disease or partial response-RECIST 1.1 after initial 3 months of
Gemcitabine based chemotherapy
8 Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 1 or 2 fit for chemotherapy
9 Normal hematological and renal and hepatic functions allowing safe delivery of chemotherapy
|
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
1 Patients with distant metastasis including non regional lymph nodes metastasis will be excluded
2 Prior abdominal therapeutic radiation
3 Past or current history of other malignancies not curatively treated and without evidence of disease for more than 5 years except for curatively treated basal cell carcinoma of the skin and in situ carcinoma of the cervix
4 Pregnancy or Lactating women |
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Stratified block randomization |
|
Method of Concealment
|
On-site computer system |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Open Label |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
Median overall survival
Time interval between the date of diagnosis and death due to any case. |
2 years |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
1. Progression free survival
Time interval between the date of diagnosis and radiological or histological (whichever earlier) evidence of disease
progression or death from any cause
2. Locoregional progression free survival
Time interval between the date of diagnosis and radiological or histological (whichever earlier) evidence of locoregional
disease progression or death from any cause
3. Response rate
Response to treatment after completion of 6 months of systemic therapy with or without radiotherapy will be assessed
using a PET CT or CECT scan using the RECIST (Ver 1.1) criteria
4. Acute and late toxicities
RTOG and CTCAE v5 criteria
5. Quality of life assessment
EORTC QLQ-c30 and FACT-Hep version 4 |
1. 2 years
2. 2 years
3. 6 months
4. 3 years
5. 2 years |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="249" Sample Size from India="249"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
Phase 2/ Phase 3 |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
22/01/2024 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="5" Months="7" Days="0" |
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
Modification(s)
|
Not Applicable |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Open to Recruitment |
|
Publication Details
|
N/A |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
Response - NO
|
|
Brief Summary
|
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two treatment regimes, namely,
systemic therapy (chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy) alone vs. systemic
therapy and radiation therapy in patients with inoperable but localized
gallbladder cancer. The main questions it aims to answer are:
• Whether adding radiation therapy to systemic therapy improves overall
survival?
• What are the effects on other endpoints like cancer-free intervals, side
effects, and quality of life? Participants will be randomly assigned to one
of the two treatment regimes mentioned earlier by a computer-based
program. Researchers will compare survival and quality of life outcomes
between the two groups. |