FULL DETAILS (Read-only)  -> Click Here to Create PDF for Current Dataset of Trial
CTRI Number  CTRI/2024/02/063288 [Registered on: 29/02/2024] Trial Registered Prospectively
Last Modified On: 28/02/2024
Post Graduate Thesis  No 
Type of Trial  Interventional 
Type of Study   Surgical/Anesthesia 
Study Design  Randomized, Parallel Group, Active Controlled Trial 
Public Title of Study   Comparison of two airway devices to see which is better to give anaesthesia in laparoscopic surgeries 
Scientific Title of Study   Comparison of LMA ProSeal and LMA ProtectorTM as airway device in laparoscopic surgeries - a randomized controlled trial 
Trial Acronym  nil 
Secondary IDs if Any  
Secondary ID  Identifier 
NIL  NIL 
 
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)  
Name  Dr Aditi Suri 
Designation  Assistant professor 
Affiliation  ALL india institute of medical sciences, new delhi 
Address  Department of anaesthesia AIIMS New Delhi

New Delhi
DELHI
110024
India 
Phone  8800798097  
Fax    
Email  aditisuri19@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Scientific Query
 
Name  Dr Bikash Ray 
Designation  Additional professor  
Affiliation  All india institute of medical sciences, new delhi 
Address  Department of anaesthesia AIIMS New Delhi

New Delhi
DELHI
110024
India 
Phone  9899323110  
Fax    
Email  bikashray.aiims@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Public Query
 
Name  Dr Bikash Ray 
Designation  Additional professor  
Affiliation  All india institute of medical sciences, new delhi 
Address  Department of anaesthesia AIIMS New Delhi


DELHI
110024
India 
Phone  9899323110  
Fax    
Email  bikashray.aiims@gmail.com  
 
Source of Monetary or Material Support  
Department of anaesthesia AIIMS New Delhi 
 
Primary Sponsor  
Name  Dr Aditi Suri 
Address  Department of anaesthesia 5th Floor Main building AIIMS New Delhi 
Type of Sponsor  Other [Self] 
 
Details of Secondary Sponsor  
Name  Address 
NIL  NIL 
 
Countries of Recruitment     India  
Sites of Study  
No of Sites = 1  
Name of Principal Investigator  Name of Site  Site Address  Phone/Fax/Email 
Dr Aditi Suri  All india institute of medical sciences  Operation theatre 6th floor Surgical block AIIMS New Delhi
New Delhi
DELHI 
8800798097

aditisuri19@gmail.com 
 
Details of Ethics Committee  
No of Ethics Committees= 1  
Name of Committee  Approval Status 
Institute Ethics Committee, All India Institute of medical sciences  Approved 
 
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI  
Status 
Not Applicable 
 
Health Condition / Problems Studied  
Health Type  Condition 
Patients  (1) ICD-10 Condition: K00-K95||Diseases of the digestive system,  
 
Intervention / Comparator Agent  
Type  Name  Details 
Comparator Agent  LMA proseal  LMA proseal as airway device in laparoscopic surgeries The device will be used intraoperatively only during the surgery for a surgery lasting less than 4 hours 
Intervention  LMA protector   LMA protector as airway device in laparoscopic surgeries lma protector is a new LMA airway device that provides better seal pressures and better protection against regurgitation or aspiration during laparoscopic surgeries. The device will be used intraoperatively only during the surgery for a surgery lasting less than 4 hours 
 
Inclusion Criteria  
Age From  18.00 Year(s)
Age To  65.00 Year(s)
Gender  Both 
Details  ASA class 1 and 2
Patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries
Duration of surgery less than 4 h
Expected blood loss less than 300 ml. 
 
ExclusionCriteria 
Details  Patients who deny consent
Anticipated difficult airway
Increased risk of aspiration (Full stomach , hiatus hernia , gastroesophageal reflux disease) 
 
Method of Generating Random Sequence   Computer generated randomization 
Method of Concealment   Not Applicable 
Blinding/Masking   Not Applicable 
Primary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
primary outcome -oropharyngeal leak pressure

secondary outcome- Time to insertion of the LMA
Postoperative sore throat
Fiberoptic score for correct placement
Ease of insertion
Adverse airway complications
peak airway pressures
Patient satisfaction score
Operator satisfaction score
Cost effective analysis of the two devices 
primary outcome -oropharyngeal leak pressure measured in both groups after insertion of LMA

Time to insertion of the LMA will be time from picking up LMA till first visualisation of EtC02 graph

Postoperative sore throat - assessed immediately postoperatively and on POD1

Fiberoptic score for correct placement - done immediately after placement of the LMA
 
 
Secondary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
secondary outcome- Time to insertion of the LMA
Postoperative sore throat
Fiberoptic score for correct placement
Ease of insertion
Adverse airway complications
peak airway pressures
Patient satisfaction score
Operator satisfaction score
Cost effective analysis of the two devices 
time of insertion will be time from picking up LMA to first appearance of etco2 graph

post op sore throat: measures immediately post op, 4. hrs post op and on post day 1 
 
Target Sample Size   Total Sample Size="140"
Sample Size from India="140" 
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" 
Phase of Trial   Phase 4 
Date of First Enrollment (India)   15/04/2024 
Date of Study Completion (India) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Date of First Enrollment (Global)  Date Missing 
Date of Study Completion (Global) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Estimated Duration of Trial   Years="1"
Months="0"
Days="0" 
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)   Not Yet Recruiting 
Recruitment Status of Trial (India)  Not Yet Recruiting 
Publication Details   N/A 
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement

Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?  

Response - NO
Brief Summary  
LMA ® Protectorâ„¢ is a recently developed second generation supraglottic airway device that has been designed to provide superior protection 
against gastric reflux and high OLP.  It is a single use, silicone airway device. The silicone cuff conforms to the airway anatomy and achieves higher seal pressures and lesser sore throat compared to PVC cuffs.(2)(3) No studies till date have attempted to compare the efficacy of LMA®ProSeal and 
LMA®Protectorâ„¢. This study will therefore compare LMA®ProSeal and LMA®Protectorâ„¢ as airway devices in laparoscopic surgeries. Use of an 
airway device with better OLP and protection against regurgitation, lower sore throat will improve patient safety and perioperative outcomes.
 
Close