Trauma is increasing at an alarming rate. In India alone, it is estimated that one million people die and 20 million are hospitalized every year due to injuries⁴. Besides the burden of disease attributes to prolonged hospital stay and delayed return to routine activities⁵.

An institutional study done by Mohammad Gad et al, had shown higher incidence of blunt trauma abdomen among trauma patients of 69.4% with around 28.3 % requiring surgical intervention⁶. An Indian based study also has shown higher incidence of abdominal trauma of about 73 %⁷. Added to this the post operative care of trauma patients undergoing surgery is of varied complexity attributed to wide range of pain manifestation and analgesics, complications due to other injuries, bleeding, nutrition, immobilization, high risk of thromboembolic events⁸.

Patients presenting at emergency department need varied services according to their condition at presentation which may range from hemodynamically stable to patients with failure and shock. Majority of deaths in blunt trauma is as a result of secondary hypovolemic shock due to intraperitoneal bleed which occur in 12% of patients⁹. Therefore, it is essential to identify trauma quickly.  FAST (focused assessment with sonography in trauma) had evolved as an noninvasive tool in place of diagnostic peritoneal lavage as a preliminary investigative step to assess the intra peritoneal pathology due to trauma especially in unstable patients¹⁰. Contrast enhanced CT is more definitive to evaluate blunt trauma, in relatively stable patients¹¹. The objective is rapid identification of those patients who need a laparotomy.

Evaluation of blunt trauma abdomen starts from stabilization of the patients followed by the assessment. Clinical assessment of patients with blunt abdominal trauma is often difficult and can be inaccurate. The most reliable signs and symptoms in alert patients are Pain, Tenderness, Gastrointestinal haemorrhage, hypovolemia, evidence of peritoneal irritation. Besides on physical examination, the following injury patterns predict the potential for intra-abdominal trauma include marks and contusions, ecchymosis, abdominal distension, local or generalised tenderness, guarding and rigidity or rebound tenderness, fullness on palpation, crepitations or instability of lower thoracic cage¹².

Patients who are haemodynamically decompensated with a positive Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) should proceed directly to a trauma laparotomy to stop major abdominal bleeding and, if applicable, other sources of bleeding (e.g., pelvic, or long bone fractures), as well as control spillage of intestinal contents. To emphasise that time is a crucial factor that with every 3 min spent in the emergency department equate to a 1% increased death probability and as a result of which trauma laparotomies tend to be mandated based on quality assessment¹³. 

The various classifications used to grade the severity of the injured organs with the organ injury scale include the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (A. A. S. T.) ¹⁴, World society of emergency surgery (WSES) grading¹³,

The various surgical procedures commonly performed in abdominal surgery due to trauma include splenectomy, partial resection of the liver, vascular repair, resection and anastomosis of bowel, colostomy, distal pancreatectomy, and nephrectomy. The most frequent postoperative morbidities related to blunt abdominal trauma in the patients who survived the initial operation were prolonged ventilatory support, high dose analgesics including opioids, nil per oral, strict bed rest, prolonged urinary catheterization, central and peripheral vascular access, multiple blood transfusions and associated transfusion reactions, wound infection, pulmonary infection, intra-abdominal abscesses, pancreatitis¹⁵.

 Various modalities are being under study to improve quality care among patients undergoing trauma surgery. ERAS is one such quality care protocol under wide use in elective surgical procedures and have been shown to lead to a reduction in hospital stay, complications and earlier resumption of normal activities¹⁶.

There is well documented evidence in the literature regarding applicability of ERAS pathways in elective bowel surgeries and have been shown to lead to a reduction in hospital stay, complications and earlier resumption of normal activities.

Multiple RCTs and meta-analysis have been done supporting the fact that in patients undergoing elective bowel surgery, early feeding is safe, well tolerated and decreases the hospital stay.