| CTRI Number | CTRI/2023/11/059394 [Registered on: 01/11/2023] Trial Registered Prospectively | 
    | Last Modified On: | 25/10/2023 | 
	
    | Post Graduate Thesis | Yes | 
    | Type of Trial | Interventional | 
    | Type of Study | Surgical/Anesthesia | 
    | Study Design | Randomized, Parallel Group, Placebo Controlled Trial | 
    | Public Title of Study | Comparison of postoperative pain relief by two types of nerve blocks after arthroscopic knee surgery. | 
    | Scientific Title of Study | Comparison of postoperative pain relief with single shot adductor canal block with or without infiltration between popliteal artery and capsule of knee block for patients undergoing knee arthroscopy. | 
    | Trial Acronym | Nil | 
    | Secondary IDs if Any | 
    
        | Secondary ID | Identifier |  
            | NIL | NIL |  | 
    | Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study) | 
        
            | Name | DrDivya Shree R |  
            | Designation | Junior resident |  
            | Affiliation | Government medical college and hospital |  
            | Address | Department of Anaesthesia and intensive care 
Government medical college and hospital sector 32 Chandigarh 
 Chandigarh
 CHANDIGARH
 160030
 India
 |  
            | Phone | 9008417024 |  
            | Fax |  |  
            | Email | divyamdgmch@gmail.com |  | 
    | Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
 | 
        
            | Name | DrSukanya Mitra |  
            | Designation | Associate Professor |  
            | Affiliation | Government medical college and hospital |  
            | Address | Department of anaesthesia and intensive care 
Government medical college and hospital 
Sector 32 Chandigarh 
 Chandigarh
 CHANDIGARH
 160030
 India
 |  
            | Phone | 9646121521 |  
            | Fax |  |  
            | Email | drsmitra12@yahoo.com |  | 
    | Details of Contact Person Public Query
 | 
        
            | Name | DrSukanya Mitra |  
            | Designation | Associate Professor |  
            | Affiliation | Government medical college and hospital |  
            | Address | Department of anaesthesia and intensive care 
Government medical college and hospital 
Sector 32 Chandigarh 
 Chandigarh
 CHANDIGARH
 160030
 India
 |  
            | Phone | 9646121521 |  
            | Fax |  |  
            | Email | drsmitra12@yahoo.com |  | 
    | Source of Monetary or Material Support | 
    
            
            | Government medical college and hospital sector 32 Chandigarh |  | 
    | Primary Sponsor | 
        
            | Name | Government medical college and hospital |  
            | Address | Department of anaesthesia and intensive care 
Government medical college and hospital 
Sector 32 Chandigarh |  
            | Type of Sponsor | Government medical college |  | 
    | Details of Secondary Sponsor |  | 
    | Countries of Recruitment | India | 
    | Sites of Study | 
    
           | No of Sites = 1 |  
        | Name of Principal
Investigator | Name of Site | Site Address | Phone/Fax/Email |  
        | DrSUKANYA MITRA | Government medical college and hospital | Department of anaesthesia and intensive care
D block 5th floor Chandigarh
 CHANDIGARH
 | 9646121521 
 Drsmitra12@yahooo.com
 |  | 
    | Details of Ethics Committee | 
    
           | No of Ethics Committees= 1 |  
                | Name of Committee | Approval Status |  
                | Institutional Ethics Committee | Approved |  | 
    | Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI |  | 
    | Health Condition / Problems Studied | 
            
                | Health Type | Condition |  
    		| Patients | (1) ICD-10 Condition: S833||Tear of articular cartilage of knee, current, |  | 
    | Intervention / Comparator Agent | 
            
                | Type | Name | Details |  
    | Intervention | Adductor canal block with IPACK block | Ultrasound guided ACB with patient in supine position with 100mm sonoplex needle at mid thigh level and 20 ml 0.5% ropivacaine plus 4 mg dexamethasone will be injected perineurally . The IPACK block performed with infiltration of 20ml of 0.2% ropivacaine via 22 gauge ,100 mm length ( Braun stimuplex ) between the popliteal artery and capsule of knee (IPACK) with knee slightly flexed in pre operative period |  
    | Comparator Agent | Adductor canal block with IPACK block ( sham block ) | Ultrasound guidedACB with patient in supine position with 100 mm sonoplex needle at mid thigh and 20 ml 0.5% ropivacaine plus 4 mg dexamethasone will be injected perineurally. The IPACK block preformed with infiltration with normal saline via 22 Gauge 100 mm length ( Braun stimuplex) between the popliteal artery and capsule of knee (IPACK ) with knee slightly flexed in pre operative period |  | 
    | Inclusion Criteria | 
            
                | Age From | 18.00 Year(s) |  
                | Age To | 65.00 Year(s) |  
                | Gender | Both |  
                | Details | 1 Age between 18 to 65 years 2 American society of anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 1 and 2
 3.BMI 18 to 30 kg/m2
 4 patients scheduled for knee arthroscopy
 |  | 
    | ExclusionCriteria | 
	            
            
                               
            
                | Details | 1 patients refusing to give informed consent 2 patients with history of relevant drug allergy
 3 patients with history of psychiatric illness and substance abuse
 4 patients with severe cardiovascular respiratory metabolic or neurological disorders
 5 pregnant and lactating women
 6 patients with coagulopathy and bleeding disorders
 7 infection at planned injection site
 8 patient on steroids
 |  | 
    | Method of Generating Random Sequence | Computer generated randomization | 
    | Method of Concealment | Sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes | 
    | Blinding/Masking | Participant and Investigator Blinded | 
    | Primary Outcome | 
             
                | Outcome | TimePoints |  
                | rescue fentanyl consumption | 4 hour, 12 hour, 24 hour |  | 
    | Secondary Outcome | 
             
                | Outcome | TimePoints |  
                | Time to first rescue analgesia 
 | Immediately after the block then 5 10 15 60 minutes followed by 4 12 24 hour interval |  
                | Pain scores on NRS | 4 12 and 24 hours after administration of block |  
                | Patient satisfaction on 0- 100 VAS | 4 12 24 hours after administration of block |  
                | Sensory and motor blockade | 4 12 24 hours after administration of block |  
                | Side effects | 4 12 24 hours after administration of block |  | 
    | Target Sample Size | Total Sample Size="24" Sample Size from India="24"
 Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
 Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
 | 
    | Phase of Trial | Phase 3/ Phase 4 | 
    | Date of First Enrollment (India) | 06/11/2023 | 
	
| Date of Study Completion (India) | Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials | 
    | Date of First Enrollment (Global) | Date Missing | 
	
| Date of Study Completion (Global) | Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials | 
    | Estimated Duration of Trial | Years="1" Months="6"
 Days="0"
 | 
    | Recruitment Status of Trial (Global) | Not Yet Recruiting | 
    | Recruitment Status of Trial (India) | Not Yet Recruiting | 
    | Publication Details | N/A | 
	
| Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement | 
    
        Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?  Response  - NO          | 
    | Brief Summary | Pain due to knee arthroscopic surgeries leads to diff in early ambulation and increased opioid use. Therefore, regional anaesthesia techniques are being increasing used to treat postoperative pain . Adductor canal block has the disadvantage of being unable to alleviate posterior knee pain . The study is designed to compare the effect of ultrasound guided adductor canal block plus IPACK versus ultrasound guided adductor canal block alone for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing knee arthroscopic surgeries. |