TITLE:-
Comparative evaluation of Clarithromycin Gel
and Chlorhexidine Gel as local drug delivery agent as an adjunct to scaling and
root planing in the management of patients with chronic periodontitis (stageIII
gradeB)– A clinico-microbiological study.
INTRODUCTION:-
The term
"periodontitis" originates from two words, i.e.,
"periodont-" meaning "structure surrounding the teeth" and
"itis" means "inflammation."
Chronic periodontitis is defined as an
inflammatory disease of tooth‑supporting tissues and if not treated, can lead
to progressive attachment loss causing destruction of the tissues, which is clinically
characterized by gingival bleeding, progressively increasing pocket depth,
clinical attachment loss and alveolar bone loss, which eventually results in
teeth loss. The prevalent etiology for periodontal diseases is the complex of
dysbiotic microbiota present in dental plaque biofilm.
600 different species of bacteria are present
and colonize in the oral cavity which alter the balance of host-bacterial
interactions ultimately leading to periodontal disease.
Gram-negative anaerobic bacteria, such as Porphyromonas
gingivalis (P.gingivalis), A. actinomycetemcomitans, Prevotella intermedia, Tannerella forsythia, Treponema denticola
Streptococcus oralis, Streptococcus intermedius, Peptostreptococcus micros, and
Fusobacterium nucleatum are dominant flora associated with chronic
periodontitis. Among all these microorganisms Porphyromonas gingivalis, Treponema denticola, Tannerella forsythia forms the Red
complex which are considered to be associated with chronic periodontitis. In chronic periodontitis 85% of diseased site is mostly associated with
P.gingivalis. The disease progression in periodontal pocket may be predicted by
the increase of P.gingivalis. Hence reduction in count of P.gingivalis is
analogous with resolution of disease at affected site.
Scaling and root planing (SRP) is still the benchmark
for nonsurgical treatment of chronic periodontitis, but it has certain
limitations such as incomplete removal of calculus from the posterior teeth or
teeth having pocket depth
3mm. To
overcome these problem surgical therapy was developed but long term therapy did
not show any superior results in term of periodontal attachment gain. Thus antimicrobials
came into existence which have proven beneficial after non-surgical and
surgical therapy.
Antimicrobials are available in various local drug delivery (LDD) forms such as
Chlorhexidine (CHX), Clarithromycin (CLM), Tetracyclines, Metronidazole,
Azithromycin, Moxifloxacin, Simvastatin, Metformin and Alendronate which are
presently being used in various drug delivery systems such as irrigations, fibers,
films, injectable, gels, strips, compacts, vesicular liposomes, microparticles,
and nanoparticle systems in the management of periodontal disease.
Over other preparations gel formulations have more
advantages. Gels can be more easily prepared and administered. They also have
properties of higher biocompatibility and more bioadhesive allowing easy
adhesion into the periodontal pocket, sustained drug release pattern, minimum
dose frequency, and drug toxicity.
Clarithromycin and Azithromycin are macrolide
antibiotics which are relatively new in terms of local application in the
management of periodontal disease.
Macrolide antimicrobials are well endured and
give a sound alternative for the treatment of odontogenic and periodontal
infections. CLM is accumulated by phagocytes, monocytes,
fibroblasts, polymorphonuclear cells, macrophages, and lymphocytes. One could
expect greater benefits, as these cells are more prevalent at periodontal
disease sites.
CLM has broad antimicrobial spectrum against
Periodontal pathogens i.e P.gingivalis, better bioavailability, favorable
tissue distribution, a low incidence of adverse drug reactions, high
concentration in GCF and remains in GCF for long duration.
0.5%
CLM gel when incorporated into subgingival periodontal pockets gives benefit
till 6 months after application.
Chlorhexidine is
the gold standard agent with which other antiplaque and antigingivitis agents
are compared. The effectiveness of this agent depends on bactericidal and
bacteriostatic effects and its substantivity in the oral cavity.
The introduction of LDD system in
periodontal pocket gives promising clinical and microbiological outcomes and
also enhances periodontal health when used as adjunct to nonsurgical periodontal
therapy.
Hence the rationale of this study is to comparatively
evaluate the clinical and microbiological effects of subgingivally delivered
0.5% Clarithromycin gel and 0.2% Chlorhexidine gel as an adjunct to SRP for
treating Chronic periodontitis patients (stageIII gradeB).
AIM OF THE STUDY:- The aim of the
study is to evaluate the clinical & microbiological parameters using 0.5%
Clarithromycin Gel and 0.2% Chlorhexidine Gel as a local drug delivery agent as
an adjunct to scaling and root planing in the management of patients with periodontitis (stageIII gradeB).
OBJECTIVE:-
Primary objective:-
To evaluate and compare the effects of 0.5%
Clarithromycin gel and 0.2% Chlorhexidine gel used as an adjunct to SRP in the
treatment of subjects with periodontitis (stageIII gradeB) as seen by change in
clinical parameters at baseline, 6 weeks, and 3months and change in microbial
parameter at baseline and 6 weeks respectively.
OTHER OBJECTIVE 1:-
1)To evaluate the effect of 0.5%
Clarithromycin gel with SRP on clinical periodontal parameters at baseline, 6
weeks & 3months & microbiologic parameters at baseline, 6weeks
respectively in patients of periodontitis (stageIII gradeB).
2)To evaluate the effect of 0.2% Chlorhexidine
gel with SRP on clinical periodontal parameters at baseline, 6 weeks &
3months & microbiologic parameters at baseline, 6weeks respectively in
patients of periodontitis (stageIII
gradeB).
OTHER OBJECTIVE 2:-
To find out the best effect among LDD agent 0.5% Clarithromycin
gel & 0.2% Chlorhexidine gel when
used as an adjunct to scaling and root
planing in the treatment of the subjects with periodontitis(stageIII gradeB) as
evaluated by change in clinical parameters of PI, GI, mSBI, PPD, CAL at
baseline, 6 weeks, and 3months and change in microbial parameter including
bacterial load of P.gingivalis at baseline and 6 weeks respectively.
METHODOLOGY:-
STUDY DESIGN:-
This is a randomized
clinical and microbiological split mouth study.
STUDY SETTING:-
The study would be
conducted abiding by all human ethical principles as per the WMA- Declaration
of Helsinki and the Guidelines of Good Clinical Practice (ICMR) will be
observed. The study will be performed with each subject unaware of which
intervention each study tooth is being subjected to. Measurements of the
evaluation parameters will be performed by a nonblinded single trained operator.
The statistician shall however be blinded to the intervention groups.
STUDY POPULATION:-
The study will be performed on systemically
healthy volunteer subjects screened for inclusion criteria by simple random sampling from their
presentation for examination at the Dental college after fulfilling the inclusion criteria and rendering informed
consent through signed document in English and local language to participate in
the study over a study period of 3 months from baseline. Sample size:-
·
The calculated sample size is 26 patients (52sites). Sampling technique:
·
The study will be conducted in patients having periodontitis (stageIII gradeB).
·
An informed consent will be taken in local and English language.
·
The test and control group are as follows-
Control group – Patient
undergoing SRP + 0.2%
chlorhexidine gel
Test group – Patient undergoing
SRP + 0.5%
clarithromycin gel Inclusion criteria: ·
Both male and female patients with generalized chronic periodontitis (stageIII gradeB). ·
Age group between 35-60 years with good systemic health. ·
Minimum 20 teeth should be present in the mouth of patients. Periodontitis
patient with atleast 2 non-adjacent teeth in 2 contralateral quadrants with CAL
> 3mm and PPD 4-6mm. Patients with no history of allergies. Exclusion criteria: ·
Patients suffering from any known systemic diseases. ·
Smokers and alcoholic patients. ·
Medication
taken by patient that would induce gingival enlargement. ·
Pregnancy or lactating female patients. ·
Patients who have received surgical or nonsurgical
periodontal therapy in last 3 months prior to the baseline visit. ·
Patients who received systemic antimicrobial therapy in last 2
months prior to entry. ·
Patients
who have received clarithromycin and chlorhexidine gel in the past. ·
Patients who have received any antibiotics, chemotherapeutic
mouth rinse or oral irrigation during past 3 months.
·
Patients allergic to any medication. EVALUATION PARAMETERS
I) Plaque
index (PI) (Silness and Loe, 1964)II)
Gingival Index (GI) (Loe and Silness, 1963) IV)
PROBING POCKET DEPTH(PPD) V) Clinical
attachment level(CAL) VI) Microbiological
analysis:-
Microbiological analysis will be done at
baseline and at 6weeks. Tris-EDTA
buffer (TE buffer) has been provided as transport media in sterile vials. The vials
containing transport media can be stored in refrigerator (4ºC) for around one
month. The vials are discarded if TE buffer gets turbid. Visible amount of plaque sample is collected from both test and control site at
baseline and 6weeks using Universal curettes (2R-2L, 4R-4L). Plaque sample is then immediately transferred to the TE buffer vials and
lid is closed. The collected
samples can store in a refrigerator (4ºC) for maximum 2 days before sending the
vials to laboratory. PROCEDURE:- ·
This
will be a split mouth design study. ·
The
patients will be subjected to careful oral examination under proper
illumination. ·
A
brief case history will be recorded from all 26 patients ·
An
informed consent will be taken from each of them. ·
A
total number of 13 patients with 26 sites each will be randomized into 2
treatment groups (13 sites in each group). In test group,
sites will be treated with SRP followed by placement of prepared 0.5% CLM agent
and in
the control group site will be treated with SRP followed by placement of 0.2%
CHX. Periodontal status will be assessed at baseline preoperatively and at
6weeks and 3 months postoperatively by using Plaque Index (Silness & Loe
1964), Gingival Index (Loe & Silness 1963) Modified Sulcus
Bleeding Index. Probing pocket depth and clinical attachment level will be
measured by acrylic stent using a color-coded periodontal probe (UNC 15
color-coded periodontal probe; Hu-Friedy, Chicago,). · For microbiological analysis plaque samples will
be collected from test and control site in contralateral quadrant and
transferred into Tris-EDTA buffer (transport media vials). · At baseline after
clinical and microbiological parameters are assessed, patient will undergo SRP until
the root surface is considered smooth and clean by the operator. After completion of
SRP, prepared local drug delivery agents (0.5% CLM gel and 0.2%
CHX
gel) will be placed in the periodontal pocket of each quadrants in the patients. This
placement will be done by 24
gauge angulated blunt cannula syringe
until it will be detected at the gingival margin. ·
In each patient only one site in one quadrant
will be enrolled for either the CLM or CHX. Patients will be masked for
allocation into the CLM or CHX groups. · To ensure retention
of the gel to be effective in the pocket, a periodontal dressing (CoePak) will
be given for seven days. ·
No antibiotics or anti-inflammatory agents
will be prescribed after treatment.
·
Postoperative home care brushing instructions will
be given. |