| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2023/10/058385 [Registered on: 06/10/2023] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
05/10/2023 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
Yes |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Drug Surgical/Anesthesia |
| Study Design |
Randomized, Parallel Group, Placebo Controlled Trial |
|
Public Title of Study
|
Administration of ketamine into spinal Anaesthesia to prevent post amputation perception of pain in a limb that is no longer there. |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
Effect of intrathecal Ketamine in prevention of Phantom limb pain following lower extremity amputation surgeries: A randomized clinical trial. |
| Trial Acronym |
NIL |
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
KATHIJA BEGAM A |
| Designation |
JUNIOR RESIDENT |
| Affiliation |
Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College |
| Address |
Department of Anaesthesiology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Nehru Nagar.
Belgaum KARNATAKA 590010 India |
| Phone |
7975310867 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
kathijaazad@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Dr Vinayaka Jannu |
| Designation |
Associate Professor |
| Affiliation |
Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College ,Belagavi |
| Address |
Department of Anaesthesiology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Nehru Nagar,Belagavi.
Belgaum KARNATAKA 590010 India |
| Phone |
9743908033 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
drvinayakjannu84@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Kathija Begam A |
| Designation |
Junior Resident |
| Affiliation |
Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Belagavi. |
| Address |
Department of Anaesthesiology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College,Nehru Nagar.
Belgaum KARNATAKA 590010 India |
| Phone |
7975310867 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
kathijaazad@gmail.com |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
| Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Belagavi-590010 |
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
Kathija Begam A |
| Address |
Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Nehru Nagar,Belagavi-590010. |
| Type of Sponsor |
Other [self] |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Dr Kathija Begam A |
Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Belagavi |
2nd Floor,Department of Anaesthesiology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Nehru Nagar. Belgaum KARNATAKA |
7975310867
kathijaazad@gmail.com |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| JNMC INSTITUTIONAL ETHICS COMMITTEE |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Patients |
(1) ICD-10 Condition: O||Medical and Surgical, |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Comparator Agent |
ketamine and normal saline |
For group K- 0.5 ml(25mg) ketamine will be administered into spinal anaesthesia and Group C will be administered 0.5ml of normal saline into spinal anaesthesia. |
| Intervention |
subarachnoid block |
Under strict aseptic precautions, using 27G Whitacre spinal needle, subarachnoid block is administered using study drug preparation between L3 and L4 intervertebral space by midline approach in sitting or lateral position of patient. After the confirmation of effective neuraxial blockade, surgical procedure is performed on the patients. |
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
18.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
65.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Both |
| Details |
1.Patient undergoing elective lower extremity amputation under Subarachnoid Block
2. Age between 18-65 years old
3. American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) I & II
|
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
1.Patients known allergic to either of the study drugs [Bupivacaine or Ketamine].
2.Patients with neuro-behavioural changes, severe diabetic /autonomic neuropathy.
3.Patients on long term analgesic medications and contraindicated for subarachnoid block.
4. Patients who failed follow ups for pain evaluation.
5. Patients who undergo further amputation during the follow up period are excluded from the further analysis.
|
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Computer generated randomization |
|
Method of Concealment
|
Sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Double Blind Double Dummy |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| Post operatively patient is developing the perception of pain or discomfort in a limb that is no longer there. |
from 6 hours to 6 months postoperatively |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| To assess the incidence and severity of post amputation phantom limb pain. |
from 6 hours to 6 months postoperatively |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="70" Sample Size from India="70"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
Phase 1 |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
20/10/2023 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="1" Months="0" Days="0" |
|
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
|
Not Applicable |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Not Yet Recruiting |
|
Publication Details
|
N/A |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
Response - NO
|
|
Brief Summary
|
Phantom limb pain refers to the
presence of painful sensations in an absent limb parts and it has been
classified as neuropathic pain syndrome[1-3]. The first medical description of
post amputation sensation was given in 1552 by Ambroise Pare, a French military
surgeon, who noticed that patients complain of severe pain in the missing limb
following amputation[4]. Phantom limb pain and sensations may have its onset
immediately or years after the amputation. There are reports of two peak
periods of onset, the first within a month and the second a year after
amputation[5]. Generally, pain diminishes in both frequency and duration during
the first 6 months after amputation[6].
Although 80% of patients may
experience phantom limb pain after lower limb amputation[4, 7], its reported
incidence varies widely due to the absence of a unified definition of phantom
limb pain or to the fact that many patients don’t report their pain for fear of
being stigmatized as mentally ill.
The underlying mechanisms of
development of phantom limb pain are poorly understood, however major changes
in both central and peripheral nervous system in response to peripheral nerve
injury and subsequent alterations in the peripheral sensory input are
postulated for the development of phantom sensations. Central sensitization,
occurring at the level of spinal cord is likely to play a important role in
ongoing pain[8-10]. Animal models of peripheral nerve injury have shown that
activation of the N-methyl D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor is integral to the
process of central sensitization, particularly in nerve injury models[11,12].
Laboratory studies implicate that sensory input from noxious stimuli at the
time of nerve injury with acute central neural plasticity leads to persistent
neuropathic pain. NMDA antagonists administered to animals prior to nerve
injury significantly reduced behavioral signs of neuropathic pain and
associated neurochemical changes[13,14]. The mechanism of action is thought to
be prevention of spinal cord sensitization.
In a randomized study assessing
the effect of pre-emptively modulating sensory input with epidural ketamine on
post-amputation pain and sensory processing, Wilson and others demonstrated
that epidural ketamine didn’t affect significantly onset of phantom pain and
stump pain after one year of observation. But postoperative analgesia was
significantly better in ketamine group with reduced stump sensitivity[8]. This
study defined role of NMDA receptors in the development of pain following amputation,
but warrants further studies to confirm its role in persistent phantom limb
pain.
However, there is still no consensus on
the efficacy of NMDA receptor antagonist ketamine intrathecally on phantom limb
pain and therefore the present study is undertaken
In this study, we assess the effect of
pre-emptive treatment with intrathecally administered NMDA antagonist, Ketamine
in combination with local anaesthetic on reducing spinal sensory transmission
triggering hyperplastic changes, acute central sensitization and the
development of persistent phantom limb pain.
|