FULL DETAILS (Read-only)  -> Click Here to Create PDF for Current Dataset of Trial
CTRI Number  CTRI/2023/05/053300 [Registered on: 31/05/2023] Trial Registered Prospectively
Last Modified On: 30/11/2024
Post Graduate Thesis  Yes 
Type of Trial  Interventional 
Type of Study   Surgical/Anesthesia 
Study Design  Randomized, Parallel Group Trial 
Public Title of Study   Two positions for intubation with videolaryngoscope in obese patients 
Scientific Title of Study   Comparison of ramped versus sniffing position for orotracheal intubation using videolaryngoscope in obese patients 
Trial Acronym   
Secondary IDs if Any  
Secondary ID  Identifier 
NIL  NIL 
 
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)  
Name  VIPIN M 
Designation  POST GRADUATE RESIDENT, DEPARTMENT OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY 
Affiliation  UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES 
Address  room No 631 B Department of Anaesthesiology UCMS and GTBH Delhi

East
DELHI
110095
India 
Phone  8903674165  
Fax    
Email  muralivipin18@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Scientific Query
 
Name  Dr Rashmi Salhotra 
Designation  Professor 
Affiliation  University College of Medical Sciences, Delhi 
Address  Room No 631 B Department of Anaesthesiology UCMS and GTBH

East
DELHI
110095
India 
Phone  9911317334  
Fax    
Email  rashmichabra@yahoo.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Public Query
 
Name  Dr Rashmi Salhotra 
Designation  Professor 
Affiliation  University College of Medical Sciences, Delhi 
Address  Room No 631 B Department of Anaesthesiology UCMS and GTBH

East
DELHI
110095
India 
Phone  9911317334  
Fax    
Email  rashmichabra@yahoo.com  
 
Source of Monetary or Material Support  
UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AND GTB HOSPITAL Dilshad Garden Delhi 
 
Primary Sponsor  
Name  University College of Medical Siences 
Address  Dilshad Garden Delhi 
Type of Sponsor  Government medical college 
 
Details of Secondary Sponsor  
Name  Address 
NIL  NIL 
 
Countries of Recruitment     India  
Sites of Study  
No of Sites = 1  
Name of Principal Investigator  Name of Site  Site Address  Phone/Fax/Email 
DR RASHMI SALHOTRA  University College of Medical Sciences  Department of Anaesthesiology Room No 631 B UCMS and GTBH Dilshad Garden, DELHI
East
DELHI 
9911317334

rashmichabra@yahoo.com 
 
Details of Ethics Committee  
No of Ethics Committees= 1  
Name of Committee  Approval Status 
INSTITUTIONAL ETHICS COMMITTEE-HUMAN RESEARCH, UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, UNIVERSITY OF DELHI  Approved 
 
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI  
Status 
Not Applicable 
 
Health Condition / Problems Studied  
Health Type  Condition 
Patients  (1) ICD-10 Condition: O||Medical and Surgical,  
 
Intervention / Comparator Agent  
Type  Name  Details 
Comparator Agent  Ramped position for intubation  Ramped position which will be given by giving a head-elevated laryngoscopy position (HELP) by lifting the head end of the operating table to align the sternal notch with the external auditory meatus objectively determined using the Spirit Level-Scale assembly.  
Comparator Agent  Sniffing position for intubation  Sniffing position: Head will be placed on a non-compressible pillow with a height of 8-10 cm 
Intervention  Videolaryngoscopy  After induction of anaesthesia intubation will be performed once within 60 second using a Tuoren videolaryngocope 
 
Inclusion Criteria  
Age From  18.00 Year(s)
Age To  99.00 Year(s)
Gender  Both 
Details  A total of 30 (15 in each group) consenting patients >18 years of age belonging to either sex,
ASA physical status I-III having BMI>30 kg/m2
with Mallampatti class I-IV airways scheduled
for elective surgical procedures requiring general anaesthesia with tracheal intubation will be
enrolled 
 
ExclusionCriteria 
Details  Cases where awake intubation is planned (without induction of anaesthesia and muscle
relaxation).
Patients requiring rapid sequence intubation (full stomach, pregnant, emergency,
gastroesophageal reflux disease, emergency laparotomy).
Patients with bleeding diathesis.
Patients with neck mass, neck irradiation, restricted neck mobility, cervical spine
injury/pathology, oral cavity growths.
Patients with h/o upper respiratory tract infection in the last 1 month. 
 
Method of Generating Random Sequence   Computer generated randomization 
Method of Concealment   Sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes 
Blinding/Masking   Participant Blinded 
Primary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
Time required for successful intubation  Once after intubation is done 
 
Secondary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
Success rate in the first intubation attempt
Difficulty in mask ventilation
Laryngoscopy time
Tube insertion time
Intubation difficulty score 
Once after intubation is complete 
 
Target Sample Size   Total Sample Size="30"
Sample Size from India="30" 
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "0"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="30" 
Phase of Trial   N/A 
Date of First Enrollment (India)   12/06/2023 
Date of Study Completion (India) 30/11/2024 
Date of First Enrollment (Global)  Date Missing 
Date of Study Completion (Global) Date Missing 
Estimated Duration of Trial   Years="1"
Months="6"
Days="0" 
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
Modification(s)  
Not Applicable 
Recruitment Status of Trial (India)  Completed 
Publication Details   None yet 
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement

Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?  

Response - NO
Brief Summary   Study title: Comparison of Ramped versus Sniffing position for orotracheal intubation using videolaryngoscope in obese patients. Rationale and Aims: Obesity is associated with an anticipated difficult airway. Patient positioning is a very important and often neglected aspect of airway management in obese with the ramped or head elevated laryngoscopy position being the most suitable for direct laryngoscopy. However, the best position for videolaryngoscopy in obese patients is yet to be researched. This study is aimed to compare ramped position versus sniffing position for orotracheal intubation using videolaryngoscope in obese patients in terms of time required for successful intubation, success rate in the first intubation attempt, difficulty in mask ventilation, laryngoscopy time, tube insertion time, intubation difficulty score, complications (oesophageal intubations, intubation failures, incidence of desaturation, trauma, sore throat and hoarseness). Methods: This prospective randomised study will be conducted between May 2023 and November 2024 after obtaining ethical approval and written informed consent from all patients. A total of 30 (15 in each group) consenting patients >18 years of age belonging to either sex, ASA physical status I-III having BMI>30 kg/m2 with Mallampatti class I-IV airways scheduled for elective surgical procedures will be enrolled. Patients requiring awake intubation, rapid sequence intubation, having bleeding diathesis, neck mass, neck irradiation, restricted neck mobility, cervical spine injury/pathology, oral cavity growths or h/o upper respiratory tract infection in the last 1 month will be excluded. Patients will be randomly allocated to either group R (ramped position) or group S (sniffing position) based on a computer-generated random number table. General anaesthesia will be induced as per standard protocol. After complete muscle relaxation, Tuoren video-laryngoscope will used for intubation. Sample size estimation and Statistical Analysis: Considering the total intubation time as 22.5 ± 6.2 s in the ramped position and 40.9 ± 9.0 s in sniffing position as per a previous study (7), to estimate a clinically important difference of 10 s in mean intubation time at α = 5% and power = 90%, a sample of 15 patients is required in each group. So, we propose to include total 30 cases, 15 in each group. Data will be entered on a spreadsheet, cleaned and analysed using SPSS version 20.0. One time measured quantitative parameters between the groups will be compared by unpaired t-test or Mann Whitney U-test depending upon nature of data. Qualitative parameters will be compared by χ2 testor Fisher’s exact test. A P-value<0.05 will be taken as significant. 
Close