CTRI Number |
CTRI/2015/06/005905 [Registered on: 10/06/2015] Trial Registered Retrospectively |
Last Modified On: |
06/06/2015 |
Post Graduate Thesis |
Yes |
Type of Trial |
Interventional |
Type of Study
|
Surgical/Anesthesia |
Study Design |
Randomized, Parallel Group Trial |
Public Title of Study
|
Comparison of two supraglottic airway devices air-Q ILA and i –gel for maintaining ventilation under general anaesthesia |
Scientific Title of Study
|
Comparison of air-Q ILA and i –gel supraglottic device in airway management during general anaesthesia – a randomised controlled trial |
Trial Acronym |
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
Secondary ID |
Identifier |
NIL |
NIL |
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
Name |
BALAJI K |
Designation |
JUNIOR RESIDENT |
Affiliation |
JIPMER |
Address |
BALAJI K
JUNIOR RESIDENT
DEPT OF ANAESTHESIA
JIPMER
PUDUCHERRY
Pondicherry PONDICHERRY 605 006 India |
Phone |
9688663021 |
Fax |
|
Email |
balajikresan@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
Name |
Suman Lata Gupta |
Designation |
Associate Professor,Anaesthesiology And Crtical Care,JIPMER |
Affiliation |
JIPMER |
Address |
Dept. of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care
JIPMER
PUDUCHERRY
Pondicherry PONDICHERRY 605 006 India |
Phone |
9488830091 |
Fax |
|
Email |
sumanlatagupta13@gmal.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
Name |
BALAJI K |
Designation |
JUNIOR RESIDENT |
Affiliation |
JIPMER |
Address |
BALAJI K
JUNIOR RESIDENT
DEPT OF ANAESTHESIA
JIPMER
PUDUCHERRY
Pondicherry PONDICHERRY 605 006 India |
Phone |
9688663021 |
Fax |
|
Email |
balajikresan@gmail.com |
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
Name |
JIPMER |
Address |
JIPMER
PONDICHERRY |
Type of Sponsor |
Research institution and hospital |
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
Sites of Study
|
No of Sites = 1 |
Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
DR SANDEEP MISHRA |
JIPMER |
Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Main OT Complex, SSB OT Complex and WCH OT complex.JIPMER
PONDICHERRY Pondicherry PONDICHERRY |
9344668104
jipmermishra@gmail.com |
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
INSTITUTE ETHICS COMMITTEE |
Approved |
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
Health Type |
Condition |
Patients |
â— ASA class 1 & 2 patients requiring general anaesthesia for elective surgery in JIPMER of age 18 to 60 year , |
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
Type |
Name |
Details |
Intervention |
air q |
air-Q® Masked Laryngeal Airways Disposable(mercury medicals) will be secured under standard anaesthesia technique. Intubation through the airway channel of air-Q® will be attempted. If not succeed it will be done under fiberoptic guidance. |
Comparator Agent |
i gel |
I-gel (Inter surgical Ltd) will be secured with standard anaesthesia technique and intubation through the airway channel of i-gel will be attempted. If not succeed it will be done under fiberoptic guidance. |
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
Age From |
18.00 Year(s) |
Age To |
60.00 Year(s) |
Gender |
Both |
Details |
ASA class 1 & 2 patients requiring general anaesthesia for elective surgery in JIPMER |
|
ExclusionCriteria |
Details |
1 Any pathology of the neck, upper respiratory tract or upper alimentary tract.
2 Predicted difficult airway,
3 A body mass index >35 kg/m2.
4 Patients with history of obstructive sleep apnea.
5 Patients at risk of pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Computer generated randomization |
Method of Concealment
|
On-site computer system |
Blinding/Masking
|
Participant Blinded |
Primary Outcome
|
Outcome |
TimePoints |
To compare the success rate of endotracheal intubation through both devices |
during perioperative period |
|
Secondary Outcome
|
Outcome |
TimePoints |
To compare the following parameters in both devices
No of attempts in device insertion and endotracheal intubation
Ease of insertion of S.G.A
Device insertion time and ET intubation time
Device removal time
|
during perioperative period |
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="70" Sample Size from India="70"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= ""
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="" |
Phase of Trial
|
Post Marketing Surveillance |
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
10/12/2013 |
Date of Study Completion (India) |
Date Missing |
Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Date Missing |
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="2" Months="0" Days="0" |
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
|
Not Applicable |
Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Completed |
Publication Details
|
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
|
Brief Summary
|
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES Primary aim — To compare the success rate of endotracheal intubation through both devices Secondary aim To compare the following parameters in both devices - No of attempts in device insertion & endotracheal intubation
- Ease of insertion of S.G.A
- Device insertion time & ET intubation time
- Device removal time
Hypothesis: AIR Q is better than I-Gel in terms of blind intubation for patients under General anesthesia |