Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?  

Response - NO

·         BACKGROUND OF STUDY:

 

·         Single visit endodontic treatment has gained preference over multiple visit endodontic due to advantages such as decreased number of operative procedures and no risk of inter-appointment leakage of the temporary restoration, and its economical.

·         There is an exponential growth in field of instrumentation to treat complexity of canal, great amount of research is been undertaken regarding the materials of file system and their manufacturing procedures.

·         Neolix neoniti and E3 Azure file system both are extremely flexible and resistant to breakage. However, they are made from different technology and have different cross sections. Both of these instruments are responsible in very big way for causing extrusion of debris which is normally seen phenomenon with any instrument used with any technique

·         So, this kind of extrusion of debris  which is one of the main causative factors for post operative pain that instrument which cause minimal extrusion becomes prudent as it causes less pain

·         Invitro study done on Neolix neoniti claimed to have decreased apical debris extrusion Whereas in vivo study done on E3 Azure with and without maintaining apical patency did not show significant post operative pain thus it leads to aim of study

 

·         PURPOSE:

 

·         To evaluate and compare incidence and intensity of the post - operative pain after single visit endodontic treatment using Neolix neoniti and E3 Azure file systems.

·         To evaluate and compare the time required for instrumentation of canals in both groups.

·         To evaluate and compare the association of variables (age and sex) between groups.