| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2023/06/053505 [Registered on: 02/06/2023] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
03/08/2023 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
No |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Diagnostic |
| Study Design |
Non-randomized, Active Controlled Trial |
|
Public Title of Study
|
Study the difference in the biopsy quality between right and left lobe of liver using endoscopic ultrasound |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
RIGHT LOBE VERSUS LEFT LOBE LIVER BIOPSY UNDER ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND GUIDANCE: A PROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY
|
| Trial Acronym |
|
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
Jayanta Samanta |
| Designation |
Associate Professor |
| Affiliation |
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh |
| Address |
Department of Gastroenterology, PGIMER, Chandigarh PGIMER, Sector -12 Chandigarh CHANDIGARH 160012 India |
| Phone |
9855319529 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
dj_samanta@yahoo.co.in |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Jayanta Samanta |
| Designation |
Associate Professor |
| Affiliation |
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh |
| Address |
Department of Gastroenterology, PGIMER, Chandigarh PGIMER, Sector -12 Chandigarh CHANDIGARH 160012 India |
| Phone |
9855319529 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
dj_samanta@yahoo.co.in |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Jayanta Samanta |
| Designation |
Associate Professor |
| Affiliation |
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh |
| Address |
Department of Gastroenterology, PGIMER, Chandigarh PGIMER, Sector -12 Chandigarh CHANDIGARH 160012 India |
| Phone |
9855319529 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
dj_samanta@yahoo.co.in |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
| Department of Gastroenterology,
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
Sector-12
Chandigarh - 160012 |
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
Jayanta Samanta |
| Address |
Department of Gastroenterology, Post graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
Sector - 12 |
| Type of Sponsor |
Other [Self] |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Jayanta Samanta |
Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh |
Department of Gastroenterology
Nehru Hospital,
PGIMER, Chandigarh
Sector -12
Chandigarh - 160012 Chandigarh CHANDIGARH |
9855319529
dj_samanta@yahoo.co.in |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| Institute Ethics Committee, PGIMER, Chandigarh |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Patients |
(1) ICD-10 Condition: K746||Other and unspecified cirrhosis ofliver, |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Comparator Agent |
Left Lobe liver biopsy |
EUS-LB protocol using wet suction technique as mentioned below:
i. Patients undergoing EUS-LB will receive moderate sedation using midazolam or nalbuphine or deep sedation using Propofol under anaesthetist monitoring, depending on the operator’s preference.
ii. A linear array echoendoscope (Olympus GF-UCT180, Center Valley, USA) will be used.
iii. Prior to the procedure, Doppler imaging will be used to ensure that no vascular structures are present along the expected trajectory of the needle
iv. The EUS-LB will be performed using a 19-G FNB needle.
v. The left lobe will be described as that liver parenchyma which is a few centimeters below the gastro-esophageal junction with the scope torqued clockwise.
vi. A preferably long vessel free trajectory allowing free passage of the needle to a depth of at least 3 cm or more will be selected.
vii. Prior to biopsy, the stylet will be removed and the needle will be primed with heparin flush and the suction syringe will be reattached to the needle hub.
viii. The needle will be then introduced into the echoendoscope channel
ix. Once liver parenchymal penetration is achieved with the needle (around 1 – 2 cm), full suction will be applied with the 20 mL vacuum syringe with fluid column.
x. One pass will consist of a total of 3-4 to-and-fro needle motions using the fanning technique under direct and continuous EUS guided visualization of the tip of the needle. Preferably 1 pass will be taken from each lobe.
xi. After the biopsy and before the needle is removed from the liver parenchyma, the suction will be turned off.
xii. The specimen will be pushed from the needle directly into the formalin solution using the stylet flush.
xiii. Time required for the procedure will be documented.
|
| Intervention |
Right lobe liver biopsy |
EUS-LB of right lobe using wet suction technique as mentioned below:
i. Patients undergoing EUS-LB will receive moderate sedation using midazolam or nalbuphine or deep sedation using Propofol under anaesthetist monitoring, depending on the operator’s preference.
ii. A linear array echoendoscope (Olympus GF-UCT180, Center Valley, USA) will be used to pass the scope into duodenum.
iii. Prior to the procedure, Doppler imaging will be used to ensure that no vascular structures are present along the expected trajectory of the needle
iv. The EUS-LB will be performed using a 19-G FNB needle.
v. The right lobe will be accessed from the duodenal bulb.
vi. A preferably long vessel free trajectory allowing free passage of the needle to a depth of at least 3 cm or more will be selected.
vii. Prior to biopsy, the stylet will be removed and the needle will be primed with heparin flush and the suction syringe will be reattached to the needle hub.
viii. The needle will be then introduced into the echoendoscope channel
ix. Once liver parenchymal penetration is achieved with the needle (around 1 – 2 cm), full suction will be applied with the 20 mL vacuum syringe with fluid column.
x. One pass will consist of a total of 3-4 to-and-fro needle motions using the fanning technique under direct and continuous EUS guided visualization of the tip of the needle. Preferably 1 pass will be taken from each lobe.
xi. After the biopsy and before the needle is removed from the liver parenchyma, the suction will be turned off.
xii. The specimen will be pushed from the needle directly into the formalin solution using the stylet flush.
xiii. Time required for the procedure will be documented.
|
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
18.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
80.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Both |
| Details |
1. Patients requiring liver biopsy
2. Informed consent obtained from the patient
3. Patients >18 years old |
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
1. Unable to obtain informed consent from the patient
2. Medically unfit for sedation
3. Pregnant patient
4. Presence of a mass lesion in the liver requiring biopsy visualized on cross-sectional imaging
5. Irreversible coagulopathy as determined by platelet count < 50,000 mm3 or International Normalized Ratio (INR) > 1.5
6. Unable to stop anticoagulation or anti-platelet therapy for 5 days prior to the procedure
7. Hemophilia
8. Presence of an alternative etiology for elevated liver tests seen during liver biopsy, e.g. biliary obstruction during EUS examination
9. Suspected or proven malignant liver disease.
10. severe cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases |
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Not Applicable |
|
Method of Concealment
|
An Open list of random numbers |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Outcome Assessor Blinded |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| Number of complete portal tracts (CPT) |
At procedure. |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
1. Post processing maximum (or aggregate) specimen length
2. Length of the longest specimen
3. Adequacy of tissue sample
4. Rates of specimen adequacy (whether pathological diagnosis is reached or not)
|
At procedure |
5. Assessment of pain scores (subjective & objective)
6. Pain medication requirement: use of narcotics/analgesics in both arms, post-procedure
|
Immediate post procedure, 1 hr., 12 hr., 24 Hr. |
| 7. Rate of adverse events |
Immediate post procedure, 24 hr, 1 week |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="28" Sample Size from India="28"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
Phase 3 |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
15/06/2023 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="1" Months="2" Days="0" |
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
Modification(s)
|
Not Applicable |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Open to Recruitment |
|
Publication Details
|
Not yet completed |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
Response - NO
|
|
Brief Summary
|
Liver biopsy is the gold standard method for accurate assessment in the diagnosis and staging of liver diseases. A substantial number of liver diseases with diagnostic dilemmas after non-invasive tests are conclusively diagnosed by histopathology. EUS guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) is currently emerging as a cost effective, safe and well tolerated procedure and helps in more representative sampling. Various advancements have since been made in the technique of EUS-LB to maximize specimen quality. Studies have been published based on needle size, needle type, suction technique and number of needle actuation. Till date limited study exists as to whether one should perform left lobe or a right lobe liver biopsy. EUS-LB can be performed from either transgastric or a transduodenal station and multiple studies published till date have reported results from left lobe biopsy. Hence this study was planned comparing right versus left lobe EUS-guided liver biopsy in terms of adequacy of tissue sample and adverse event profile. It will also allow us to establish whether bilobar liver biopsy has any added advantage over either lobe (right/left) liver biopsy.
|