| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2018/03/012284 [Registered on: 01/03/2018] Trial Registered Retrospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
28/02/2018 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
No |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Other (Specify) [Cosmoceutical] |
| Study Design |
Randomized, Parallel Group Trial |
|
Public Title of Study
|
Efficacy evaluation of hair tonic in healthy human subjects |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
A double blinded, randomized, placebo controlled study to evaluate the efficacy of hair tonic on healthy human subjects. |
| Trial Acronym |
NIL |
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| MSCR/ITHS/2013-10,version 1.0 dated 25th Oct 2013 |
Protocol Number |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
Dr Mukesh Ramnane |
| Designation |
Principal Investigator |
| Affiliation |
MS Clinical Research Pvt.Ltd. |
| Address |
Mezzanine Floor, Classic Court, 9/1 Richmond Road, Bangalore
Bangalore KARNATAKA 560025 India |
| Phone |
08040917253 |
| Fax |
08041125934 |
| Email |
mukesh.ramnane@mscr.in |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Dr Mukesh Ramnane |
| Designation |
Principal Investigator |
| Affiliation |
MS Clinical Research Pvt.Ltd. |
| Address |
Mezzanine Floor, Classic Court, 9/1 Richmond Road, Bangalore
KARNATAKA 560025 India |
| Phone |
08040917253 |
| Fax |
08041125934 |
| Email |
mukesh.ramnane@mscr.in |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Dr Mukesh Ramnane |
| Designation |
Principal Investigator |
| Affiliation |
MS Clinical Research Pvt.Ltd. |
| Address |
Mezzanine Floor, Classic Court, 9/1 Richmond Road, Bangalore
KARNATAKA 560025 India |
| Phone |
08040917253 |
| Fax |
08041125934 |
| Email |
mukesh.ramnane@mscr.in |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
ITC R D Centre |
| Address |
Peenya Industrial Area,
I Phase, Peenya,
Bangalore |
| Type of Sponsor |
Other [FMCG] |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Dr Mukesh Ramnane |
MS Clinical Research Pvt Ltd |
Room no. 1, hair evaluation department,Mezzanine Floor, Classic Court, 9/1 Richmond Road, Bangalore-560025 Bangalore KARNATAKA |
08040917253 08041125934 mukesh.ramnane@mscr.in |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| Clinicom, Independent Ethics Committee, Bangalore |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Healthy Human Volunteers |
1)Female subjects falling under Grade 2 – Grade-4 of hair loss severity grade.
2)Male subjects falling under Grade 2 to Grade 4 of hair loss severity grade. |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Intervention |
Hair tonic |
Dose: 7 ml of hair tonic per day
Frequency: daily once
Duration: 108 days for each subject.
Mode of administration: Topical application |
| Comparator Agent |
Placebo |
Dose: 7 ml of hair tonic per day Frequency: daily once
Duration: 108 days for each subject.
Mode of administration: Topical application |
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
25.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
55.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Both |
| Details |
1)Female subjects falling under Grade 2 – Grade-4 of hair loss severity grade
2)Male subjects falling under Grade 2 to Grade 4 of hair loss severity grade
|
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
1)Subjects who are undergoing hair growth treatment 3 months before screening into the study.
2)Subjects who have scalp conditions such as folliculitis, seborrheoic psoriasis of scalp, seborrheoic dermatitis and lichen planopilaris at the time of screening.
|
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Other |
|
Method of Concealment
|
Other |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Participant and Investigator Blinded |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| evaluate the safety and efficacy of the investigational product in hair fall control or growth in comparison to baseline and placebo |
1)Dermatological assessment of hair and scalp will be done on visits 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and visit 14.
|
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="100" Sample Size from India="100"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "100"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="82" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
N/A |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
19/12/2013 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
28/05/2014 |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Date Missing |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="0" Months="5" Days="0" |
|
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
|
Not Applicable |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Completed |
|
Publication Details
|
None yet. |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
|
|
Brief Summary
|
·
In the study conducted with 100
enrolled subjects, over a period of 108 days to evaluate the efficacy of hair
tonic on healthy human subjects. By imaging assessment, the improvement was seen highest in group A compared
to group B.The products emerged to be
overall safe with no clinically significant site application reaction reported during the study .Both group-A
and group-B showed Improvement in flaking, itching and oiliness at visit11
compared to baseline. Scalling improved in two subjects out of four subjects
reported at baseline. The severities of the dryness in one subject was resolved
at visit 11. Subject
perception on different parameters of hair was collected and assessed to be in
favour of the both groups in hair fall rate and significant improvement in hair volume, hair growth rate and
strength of the hair at visit 11. The group A showed significant
improvement in reduction of hair fall on visit11 compared to group B by comb test (Hair with bulb) and the significant
improvement was observed in the reduction of hair fall in both group A and
group B by comb test (Hair without bulb). Phototrichogram assessment: There was an
improvement was observed in hair growth
rate at visit9vsvisit8 in both group A
and Group-B at visit11 compared to visit 3 vs visit 2. ReRESULTS: The improvement in hair density
was found to be higher in Group A compared to Group B. Both the groups also effective
in scalp condition. Group A showed 100% normal scalp condition and group B showed 96.3% normal scalp
condition at visit 11. |