FULL DETAILS (Read-only)  -> Click Here to Create PDF for Current Dataset of Trial
CTRI Number  CTRI/2023/04/051560 [Registered on: 12/04/2023] Trial Registered Prospectively
Last Modified On: 01/02/2024
Post Graduate Thesis  Yes 
Type of Trial  Interventional 
Type of Study   Physiotherapy (Not Including YOGA) 
Study Design  Randomized, Parallel Group Trial 
Public Title of Study   A study to compare muscle energy technique versus scapular neuromuscular facilitation in improving pain and range of motion in patients with adhesive capsulitis 
Scientific Title of Study   A study to compare the effectiveness of muscle energy technique versus scapular neuromuscular facilitation technique in improving pain and range of motion in patients with adhesive capsulitis of age group 40 to 60 years: A Randomized Control Trail  
Trial Acronym   
Secondary IDs if Any  
Secondary ID  Identifier 
NIL  NIL 
 
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)  
Name  Chandana N 
Designation  Master of physiotherapy in musculoskeletal science 
Affiliation  Narayana hrudayalaya institute of physiotherapy 
Address  Narayana Hrudayalaya Foundations 258/A,Health City,Bommasandra industrial area,Anekal Taluk,Bangalore

Bangalore
KARNATAKA
560099
India 
Phone  7904493141  
Fax    
Email  chandana31n@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Scientific Query
 
Name  Chandana N 
Designation  Master of physiotherapy in musculoskeletal science 
Affiliation  Narayana hrudayalaya institute of physiotherapy 
Address  Narayana Hrudayalaya Foundations 258/A,Health City,Bommasandra industrial area,Anekal Taluk,Bangalore

Bangalore
KARNATAKA
560099
India 
Phone  7904493141  
Fax    
Email  chandana31n@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Public Query
 
Name  Smruti Swagatika Dash 
Designation  Professor 
Affiliation  Narayana hrudayalaya institute of physiotherapy 
Address  Narayana Hrudayalaya Foundations 258/A,Health City,Bommasandra industrial area,Anekal Taluk,Bangalore

Bangalore
KARNATAKA
560099
India 
Phone  9448552026  
Fax    
Email  smruti.dash@hrudayalayafoundation.org  
 
Source of Monetary or Material Support  
Narayana Hrudayalaya Institute of Physiotherapy  
 
Primary Sponsor  
Name  Chandana N 
Address  Narayana Hrudayalaya Foundations 258/A, Health city, Bommasandra industrial Area, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore 
Type of Sponsor  Other [self] 
 
Details of Secondary Sponsor  
Name  Address 
NIL  NIL 
 
Countries of Recruitment     India  
Sites of Study  
No of Sites = 1  
Name of Principal Investigator  Name of Site  Site Address  Phone/Fax/Email 
Chandana N  Narayana Health City  Physiotherapy out patient rehabilitation department, basement
Bangalore
KARNATAKA 
7904493141

chandana31n@gmail.com 
 
Details of Ethics Committee  
No of Ethics Committees= 1  
Name of Committee  Approval Status 
Narayana Health Academic Ethics committe  Approved 
 
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI  
Status 
Not Applicable 
 
Health Condition / Problems Studied  
Health Type  Condition 
Patients  (1) ICD-10 Condition: M750||Adhesive capsulitis of shoulder,  
 
Intervention / Comparator Agent  
Type  Name  Details 
Intervention  1.Muscle Energy Technique   Muscle energy technique will be given to group A, Muscle energy technique will be given as 5 repetitions/set, 3 sets/session, 3session/week for 4 weeks duration for shoulder flexion, shoulder abduction, shoulder internal rotation and shoulder external rotation along with conventional physiotherapy  
Intervention  2. Scapular proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation  Scapular proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation will be given to group B, scapular Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation will be applied by in two diagonals, anterior elevation and posterior depression and posterior elevation and anterior depression. Subjects will be applied with scapular proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation for 20 repetitions/set, 3session/week for 4 weeks duration along with conventional physiotherapy  
Comparator Agent  Not applicable   Not applicable  
 
Inclusion Criteria  
Age From  40.00 Year(s)
Age To  60.00 Year(s)
Gender  Both 
Details  1. Age group between 40-60 years.
2. Both males and females.
3. Unilateral limb involvement.
4. Subject having stiff painful shoulder for at least 3 month duration.
5. Subjects with limited Range of motion of shoulder abduction and external rotation.

 
 
ExclusionCriteria 
Details  1. Acute inflammation,
2. Subjects with systemic disorders,
3. Subject with neurological disorders/ musculoskeletal disorder,
4. Recent fracture in and around the shoulder,
5. Recent shoulder dislocation,
6. Rheumatoid arthritis,
7. Any cardiac pacemakers,
8. Skin problem,
9. Past surgery around shoulder joint
 
 
Method of Generating Random Sequence   Computer generated randomization 
Method of Concealment   Sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes 
Blinding/Masking   Participant and Outcome Assessor Blinded 
Primary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
visual analog scale, Range of motion, SPADI  Baseline-0th week
Post intervention-4th weeks 
 
Secondary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
SPADI  Baseline-0th week
Post intervention-4th weeks 
 
Target Sample Size   Total Sample Size="52"
Sample Size from India="52" 
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" 
Phase of Trial   N/A 
Date of First Enrollment (India)   15/04/2023 
Date of Study Completion (India) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Date of First Enrollment (Global)  Date Missing 
Date of Study Completion (Global) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Estimated Duration of Trial   Years="0"
Months="3"
Days="0" 
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
Modification(s)  
Completed 
Recruitment Status of Trial (India)  Closed to Recruitment of Participants 
Publication Details   none yet 
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement

Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?  

Response - NO
Brief Summary   purpose:

The study aims to find effectiveness of muscle energy technique along with conventional physiotherapy which is compared with scapular proprioceptive neuromuscular technique in improving range of motion and pain among adhesive capsulitis of age group group 40 to 60.

 

The hypotheses and objectives of the study can be outlined as:

 

Hypothesis:

 

Null Hypothesis [H0]:

§  There will be no significant effect of muscle energy technique in improving range of motion and pain on adhesive capsulitis patients

§  There will be no significant effect of scapular proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitations in improving range of motion and pain on adhesive capsulitis patients

§  There will be no significant difference of muscle energy techniques compared to scapular proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation in improving range of motion and pain on adhesive capsulitis patients 

    Alternate Hypothesis [H1]:

§  There will be significant effect of muscle energy technique in improving range of motion and pain on adhesive capsulitis patients

§  There will be significant effect of scapular proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitations in improving range of motion and pain on adhesive capsulitis patients

§  There will be significant difference of muscle energy techniques compared to scapular proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation in improving range of motion and pain on adhesive capsulitis patients 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Close