FULL DETAILS (Read-only)  -> Click Here to Create PDF for Current Dataset of Trial
CTRI Number  CTRI/2023/02/049512 [Registered on: 07/02/2023] Trial Registered Prospectively
Last Modified On: 18/02/2023
Post Graduate Thesis  Yes 
Type of Trial  Interventional 
Type of Study   Dentistry 
Study Design  Randomized, Parallel Group, Active Controlled Trial 
Public Title of Study   To evaluate the effect of osseodensification technique on bone density around dental implants. 
Scientific Title of Study   A comparative evaluation of effect of osseodensification on bone density around dental implants: A randomized control trial. 
Trial Acronym   
Secondary IDs if Any  
Secondary ID  Identifier 
NIL  NIL 
 
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)  
Name  Dr Bhujbal Rushikesh Bhau 
Designation  Junior Resident 
Affiliation  King Georges Medical University,Lucknow 
Address  Dept Of Prosthodontics,Crowns and Bridges, New Dental Building, King Georges Medical University, Lucknow,Uttar Pradesh.

Lucknow
UTTAR PRADESH
226003
India 
Phone  9096060601  
Fax    
Email  dr.rushibhujbal@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Scientific Query
 
Name  Dr Pooran Chand 
Designation  Professor and Head of the Department 
Affiliation  King Georges Medical University,Lucknow 
Address  Dept Of Prosthodontics,Crowns and Bridges, New Dental Building, King Georges Medical University, Lucknow,Uttar Pradesh.

Lucknow
UTTAR PRADESH
226003
India 
Phone  9415173419  
Fax    
Email  dr.pooran_chand@yahoo.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Public Query
 
Name  Dr Bhujbal Rushikesh Bhau 
Designation  Junior Resident 
Affiliation  King Georges Medical University,Lucknow 
Address  Dept Of Prosthodontics,Crowns and Bridges, New Dental Building, King Georges Medical University, Lucknow,Uttar Pradesh.

Lucknow
UTTAR PRADESH
226003
India 
Phone  9096060601  
Fax    
Email  dr.rushibhujbal@gmail.com  
 
Source of Monetary or Material Support  
Department Of Prosthodontics,Crown And Bridges, King Georges Medical University, Lucknow. 
 
Primary Sponsor  
Name  Bhujbal Rushikesh Bhau 
Address  Dept Of Prosthodontics,Crowns and Bridges, New Dental Building, King Georges Medical University, Lucknow,Uttar Pradesh. 
Type of Sponsor  Other [Self] 
 
Details of Secondary Sponsor  
Name  Address 
NIL  NIL 
 
Countries of Recruitment     India  
Sites of Study  
No of Sites = 1  
Name of Principal Investigator  Name of Site  Site Address  Phone/Fax/Email 
Dr Bhujbal Rushikesh Bhau  King Georges Medical University  Dept Of Prosthodontics,Crowns and Bridges, 6th floor, New Dental Building, King Georges Medical University, Lucknow,Uttar Pradesh.226003
Lucknow
UTTAR PRADESH 
9096060601

dr.rushibhujbal@gmail.com 
 
Details of Ethics Committee  
No of Ethics Committees= 1  
Name of Committee  Approval Status 
King Georges Medical University U.P.,Institutional Ethics Committee Lucknow-226003 (UP) India  Approved 
 
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI  
Status 
Not Applicable 
 
Health Condition / Problems Studied  
Health Type  Condition 
Patients  (1) ICD-10 Condition: K084||Partial loss of teeth,  
 
Intervention / Comparator Agent  
Type  Name  Details 
Comparator Agent  Conventional Technique (CT) Group  Dental implants placed without osseodensification. 
Intervention  Osseodensification Technique(OT) group  Dental implants placed with osseodensification. 
 
Inclusion Criteria  
Age From  18.00 Year(s)
Age To  70.00 Year(s)
Gender  Both 
Details  1)Partial Edentulism in Maxilla.
2)Adequate Oral hygiene.
3)Adequate bone volume for implant placement. 
 
ExclusionCriteria 
Details  1)Systemic Diseases.
2)Habit of smoking and chewing tobacco.
3)Bruxism
4)Bone diseases.
 
 
Method of Generating Random Sequence   Computer generated randomization 
Method of Concealment   On-site computer system 
Blinding/Masking   Participant and Outcome Assessor Blinded 
Primary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
To compare osteoprotegrin level in periimplant crevicular fluid(PICF) from dental implants placed with osseodensification and conventional technique.  1)2 weeks
2)12 weeks 
 
Secondary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
To compare bone mineral density around dental implants placed with osseodensification and conventional technique.  1)Pre-operative(Baseline)
2)2 weeks
3)12 weeks 
To find association between osteoprotegrin and bone mineral density.  1)2 weeks
2)12 weeks 
 
Target Sample Size   Total Sample Size="48"
Sample Size from India="48" 
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" 
Phase of Trial   N/A 
Date of First Enrollment (India)   10/02/2023 
Date of Study Completion (India) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Date of First Enrollment (Global)  Date Missing 
Date of Study Completion (Global) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Estimated Duration of Trial   Years="1"
Months="0"
Days="0" 
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
Modification(s)  
Not Applicable 
Recruitment Status of Trial (India)  Open to Recruitment 
Publication Details   NIL 
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement

Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?  

Response - NO
Brief Summary  

Introduction

Dental implant is the part of the prosthesis that interfaces  the bone and supports the dental prosthesis. It is a widely used treatment modality.

Primary stability in dental implants is an essential factor for achieving successful osseointegration. Surgical procedure and bone quality are among the most common factors that affect primary stability. It is also crucial to achieve high-insertion torque which is important for obtaining primary stability. Maintaining sufficient bone bulk and density is essential to achieve necessary bone-to-implant contact for obtaining a biomechanically stable implant. A new concept for osteotomy called osseodensification (OD) has been at the forefront of changes in surgical site preparation in implantology. It is done with specially designed bur that has many lands with a large negative rake angle, which works as noncutting edges to increase the density of the bone as they expand an osteotomy.

The bone density corresponds to the bone remodelling activity of osteoblast and osteoclast. Local factors like levels of osteoprotegrin(OPG) has a significant role in it.

OPG is expressed by osteoblast.

The OPG protein is a novel member of TNF family.It is a regulator of bone density that act locally and systematically by negatively regulating osteoclast maturation.

 Its expression is regulated by most of the factors that induce RANKL expression by osteoblasts. OPG protects the skeleton from excessive bone resorption by binding to RANKL and preventing it from binding to its receptor, RANK.

 

 The aim of the present study is to comparatively evaluate the effect of osseodensification technique on  bone mineral density.

 

RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS:

Null Hypothesis

It will be hypothesized  that there is no significant change in bone mineral density and osteoprotegrin around dental implants placed through conventional drilling protocol with osseodensification and conventional drilling protocol.

Objective :

1)To compare osteoprotegrin level  in Periimplant crevicular fluid(PICF) from dental implants placed with osseodensification and conventional technique.

2) To compare bone mineral density around implants placed with osseodensification and conventional technique.

3) To find association between osteoprotegrin and bone mineral density.

This trial is in accordance with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trails(CONSORT) criteria, 2010.

 
Close