| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2023/03/050605 [Registered on: 13/03/2023] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
09/03/2023 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
Yes |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Surgical/Anesthesia |
| Study Design |
Randomized, Parallel Group Trial |
|
Public Title of Study
|
A Comparative study between two operative procedures for ventral hernia eTEP RS and IPOM plus |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
Extended view totally extraperitoneal Rives Stoppa (e-TEP RS) versus laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) plus repair for ventral hernia-A Randomized controlled study |
| Trial Acronym |
|
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
Binit Sharma |
| Designation |
Post graduate trainee |
| Affiliation |
Maulana Azad medical college |
| Address |
2, Bahadur shah Zafar marg, MAMC Campus,New Delhi, Delhi-110002 2, Bahadur shah Zafar marg, New Delhi, Delhi-110002 Central DELHI 110002 India |
| Phone |
7003613007 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
Sharma.binit2013@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Dr Pawanindra Lal |
| Designation |
Director professor and HOD |
| Affiliation |
Maulana Azad medical college |
| Address |
2, Bahadur shah Zafar marg, MAMC Campus,New Delhi, Delhi-110002 2, Bahadur shah Zafar marg, New Delhi, Delhi-110002 Central DELHI 110002 India |
| Phone |
9891209609 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
Profplal@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Binit Sharma |
| Designation |
Post graduate trainee |
| Affiliation |
Maulana Azad medical college |
| Address |
2, Bahadur shah Zafar marg, MAMC Campus,New Delhi, Delhi-110002 2, Bahadur shah Zafar marg, New Delhi, Delhi-110002 Central DELHI 110002 India |
| Phone |
7003613007 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
Sharma.binit2013@gmail.com |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
| Maulana Azad Medical College |
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
Binit Sharma |
| Address |
2, Bahadur shah Zafar marg, MAMC Campus, New Delhi-110002 |
| Type of Sponsor |
Other [Self] |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Dr Binit Sharma |
Lok Nayak Hospital |
2, Bahadur shah Zafar marg, New Delhi, Delhi-110002 surgery department Central DELHI |
7003613007
Sharma.binit2013@gmail.com |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| Institutional Ethics committee, MAMC |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Patients |
(1) ICD-10 Condition: O||Medical and Surgical, |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Comparator Agent |
laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) plus repair for ventral hernia |
operative procedures in which we go into the peritoneal cavity and mesh is placed on inner surface of peritoneum |
| Intervention |
Extended view totally extraperitoneal Rives Stoppa (e-TEP RS) repair for ventral hernia |
operative procedure in which retrorectus space is used for mesh placement. |
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
18.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
75.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Both |
| Details |
All cases of midline ventral hernia(M2,M3) in central or lower abdomen between age 18-75 years |
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
1. Patients with defect size > 6cm
2. Recurrent Hernias
3. Emergency cases
4. Hernia with skin infections and enterocutaneous fistula
5. Unfit for General Anaesthesia
6. BMI more than 35 |
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Random Number Table |
|
Method of Concealment
|
An Open list of random numbers |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Participant Blinded |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| Operative time defined from incision to last stitch between e-TEP RS versus IPOM plus |
Duration of operation defined from incision to last stitch between e-TEP RS versus IPOM plus |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
1. Postoperative pain using VAS score at 1day, 1week, 6 week postop
2. Duration of hospital stay(Days)
3. Return to work(Days) |
Vas score at 1 day, 1 week, 6 week |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="20" Sample Size from India="20"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
N/A |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
15/03/2023 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="1" Months="0" Days="0" |
|
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
|
Not Yet Recruiting |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Not Yet Recruiting |
|
Publication Details
|
|
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
Response - YES
- What data in particular will be shared?
Response - Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after de-identification (text, tables, figures, and appendices).
- What additional supporting information will be shared?
Response - Study Protocol Response - Statistical Analysis Plan Response - Informed Consent Form Response - Clinical Study Report
- Who will be able to view these files?
Response - Anyone
- For what types of analyses will this data be available?
Response - Any purpose.
- By what mechanism will data be made available?
Response (Others) - MAMC Library
- For how long will this data be available start date provided 18-01-2024 and end date provided 18-12-2024?
Response - Immediately following publication. No end date.
- Any URL or additional information regarding plan/policy for sharing IPD?
Additional Information - Nil
|
|
Brief Summary
|
Primary and incisional ventral hernias repairs have always been a challenge for surgeons. In the current era, so many different options for the management of these hernias are available from various open to minimal invasive techniques, and this diversity of techniques makes the decision making more difficult in ventral hernia. Surgeons are still in a search of the ideal or standardized method that adequately decreases postoperative complications and improves quality of life. According to latest evidence, laparoscopic techniques have the advantage of shorter hospital stay after surgery, early resumption of work, and lesser surgical wound complications as compared to open techniques. From IPOM to e-TEP, minimal invasive procedures for ventral hernia repair with different techniques and mesh positions have evolved rapidly in the last decade. e-TEP offers the benefit of a minimally invasive procedure along with mesh in sublay/retrorectus position, hence avoiding the intra-abdominal mesh-related complications. .Another advantage of e-TEP in large ventral hernia is that if closure is difficult or not possible, then posterior component separation technique in the form of transversus abdominis release can be combined as the plane of dissection is the same. As per available evidence, it is believed that mesh in sublay position offers superior quality of postoperative connective tissue formation, less recurrence, and less cost as compared to composite mesh with anti-adhesion barrier used for intra-peritoneal position. The current data are lacking, as till now only one retrospective comparative study by Penchev et al. of both the approaches has been published. |