| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2014/09/005050 [Registered on: 24/09/2014] Trial Registered Retrospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
28/12/2018 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
No |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Process of Care Changes |
| Study Design |
Randomized, Parallel Group Trial |
Public Title of Study
Modification(s)
|
Fluid bolus administration over 15-20 minutes versus 5-10 minutes each in children with septic shock |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
Administration of fluid bolus over 15-20 minutes versus 5-10 minutes in children with septic shock in the ‘first hour’ of resuscitation– A Randomized Controlled Trial |
| Trial Acronym |
|
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
Jhuma Sankar |
| Designation |
Associate Professor |
| Affiliation |
PGIMER, Dr RML Hospital |
| Address |
Room-403, Department of Pediatrics, PGIMER, Dr RML Hospital
Central DELHI 110001 India |
| Phone |
|
| Fax |
|
| Email |
jhumaji@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Jhuma Sankar |
| Designation |
Associate Professor |
| Affiliation |
PGIMER, Dr RML Hospital |
| Address |
Room-403, Department of Pediatrics, PGIMER, Dr RML Hospital
Central DELHI 110001 India |
| Phone |
|
| Fax |
|
| Email |
jhumaji@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Jhuma Sankar |
| Designation |
Associate Professor |
| Affiliation |
PGIMER, Dr RML Hospital |
| Address |
Room-403, Department of Pediatrics, PGIMER, Dr RML Hospital
Central DELHI 110001 India |
| Phone |
|
| Fax |
|
| Email |
jhumaji@gmail.com |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
PGIMER Dr RML Hospital |
| Address |
Baba Kharak Singh Marg; New Delhi |
| Type of Sponsor |
Research institution and hospital |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Jhuma Sankar |
PGIMER, Dr RML Hospital |
Room no-403
Administrative Block
PGIMER, Dr RML Hospital, Baba Kharak Singh Marg, New Delhi Central DELHI |
9818399864
jhumaji@gmail.com |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| Institutional Ethics Committee, PGIMER Dr RML Hospital |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
Modification(s)
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Patients |
Children 17 years of age with septic shock , (1) ICD-10 Condition: A419||Sepsis, unspecified organism, |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Intervention |
Fluid bolus over 15-20 minutes |
Fluid bolus of 20 ml/kg would be administered over 15-20 minutes |
| Comparator Agent |
Fluid bolus over 5-10 minutes |
Fluid bolus of 20 ml/kg would be administered over 5-10 minutes |
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
2.00 Month(s) |
| Age To |
17.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Both |
| Details |
Children < 18 years of age with features of septic shock with or without hypotension would be included |
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
1. Moderate to severely malnourished children (Indian Academy of Pediatrics classification for malnutrition grades 3 and 4)
2. Primary cardiac illness
3. Contraindication to central venous catheter insertion
4. Children with features of fluid overload at presentation
5. Children whose parents refuse to give an informed consent
|
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Computer generated randomization |
|
Method of Concealment
|
Sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Outcome Assessor Blinded |
Primary Outcome
Modification(s)
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
The proportion of children requiring mechanical ventilation and/or impaired oxygenation (Oxygenation Index) in those already on ventilator
|
At 6 and 24 hours of admission |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
To assess the effect of intervention on
1.The amount of fluid required (in ml/kg)
2. Inotropic score
3.Proportion of children attaining therapeutic end points
4.Duration of ventilation (in hours)
5.Duration of inotropic support (in hours)
6.Time to achieving therapeutic end points
7.Duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stay
8.Mortality and
9. Serum pro-BNP levels
|
1. Amount of fluid required in first 6 and 24 hours.
2. Inotropic score at 6 and 24 hours.
3. Attaining therapeutic end points at 6 hours.
4. Total duration of ventilation.
5. Total time period to achieving therapeutic end points.
6. Total duration of ICU stay
7. Serum pro BNP levels at 1 and 6 hrs post initial fluid boluses |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="220" Sample Size from India="220"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
Phase 4 |
Date of First Enrollment (India)
Modification(s)
|
16/09/2013 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
16/09/2013 |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="2" Months="6" Days="0" |
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
Modification(s)
|
Other (Terminated) |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Other (Terminated) |
|
Publication Details
|
None |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
|
Brief Summary
Modification(s)
|
Septic shock in children is most commonly associated with severe hypovolemia. Studies on pediatric septic shock have shown that early and aggressive resuscitation including administration of fluid volumes up to 60ml/kg in the first hour of resuscitation results in 9 fold reduction in mortality in these children. Therefore the management guidelines for septic shock in children advocates aggressive fluid resuscitation of up to 60 ml/kg as boluses of 20ml/kg each over a total duration of 20-30 minutes to achieve desired heart rates, and blood pressure. Although advocated, this duration of administration may not be practical in all types of setups for 2 important reasons a) due to logistics of administering such large volumes in 5-10 minutes (thin veins) and b) due to the fear of fluid overload as most of these facilities may not be equipped to ventilate these children in case fluid overload develops. Not surprisingly therefore, the average time duration reported in pediatric literature till date of administering each bolus has ranged from anywhere between 15-30 minutes per bolus to 45-60 minutes per bolus. Given this background, we decided to compare these two time durations- that is the one proposed (5-10minutes) versus the one commonly used (15-20 minutes) of individual bolus administration on immediate effects such as proportion developing fluid overload and/or proportion requiring mechanical ventilation and critical outcomes such as mortality. There is a plan to enroll 220 subjects over a period of 2 years. The bolus will be administered by manual push in the 5-10 minutes group and by infusion pump timed for 15 minutes in the 15 minute group soon after enrollment. This study will provide an answer to the duration of administration of each fluid bolus in children with septic shock in the first hour of resuscitation. If proven to be superior or similar in terms of primary outcomes the 15-20 minutes time duration may be recommended instead of the 5-10 minutes duration for administration of each fluid bolus thereby ensuring better compliance with the guidelines and improved outcomes in children with septic shock. In August 2014, we performed interim analysis after enrolling ~ 50% of patients (n=96) and found that fewer children receiving fluid boluses over 15-20 minutes required mechanical ventilation than those receiving boluses over 5-10 minutes. Due to safety concerns in the group receiving boluses over 5-10 minutes we had to stop the study as per the mandate of the IEC. |