CTRI Number |
CTRI/2022/04/042218 [Registered on: 27/04/2022] Trial Registered Prospectively |
Last Modified On: |
22/04/2022 |
Post Graduate Thesis |
Yes |
Type of Trial |
Interventional |
Type of Study
|
Drug |
Study Design |
Other |
Public Title of Study
|
Different methods for trying normal delivery |
Scientific Title of Study
|
“COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PERVAGINAL MISOPROSTOL, INTRACERVICAL FOLEY CATHETER, INTRACERVICAL DINOPROSTONE AS METHODS OF INDUCTION OF LABOUR AND MATERNAL AND FETAL OUTCOME†|
Trial Acronym |
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
Secondary ID |
Identifier |
NIL |
NIL |
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
Name |
Dr Hanumant V Nipanal |
Designation |
Associate Professor |
Affiliation |
Gadag Institute of Medical Sciences Gadag |
Address |
Gadag Institute of Medical Sciences Gadag District hospital premises Mallasamudra
Gadag KARNATAKA 582101 India |
Phone |
9448001054 |
Fax |
|
Email |
hanumantvn.1210@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
Name |
Dr Hanumant V Nipanal |
Designation |
Associate Professor |
Affiliation |
Gadag Institute of Medical Sciences Gadag |
Address |
Gadag Institute of Medical sciences Gadag District hospital premises Mallasamudra
Gadag KARNATAKA 582101 India |
Phone |
9448001054 |
Fax |
|
Email |
hanumantvn.1210@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
Name |
Dr Praveen Uppar |
Designation |
Junior Resident |
Affiliation |
Gadag Institute of Medical Sciences, Gadag |
Address |
Gadag Institute of Medical Sciences, Gadag District hospital premises Mallasamudra
Gadag KARNATAKA 582101 India |
Phone |
9448001054 |
Fax |
|
Email |
praveenuppar0271995@gmail.com |
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
GIMS Gadag Medical College |
|
Primary Sponsor
|
Name |
GIMS Gadag |
Address |
GIMS Gadag |
Type of Sponsor |
Government medical college |
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
Sites of Study
|
No of Sites = 1 |
Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
Hanumant v nipanal |
Gadag Institute of Medical Sciences, Gadag |
Department of OBG Gadag KARNATAKA |
9448001054
hanumantvn.1210@gmail.com |
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
Institutional Ethical committee GIMS Gadag |
Approved |
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
Health Type |
Condition |
Patients |
(1) ICD-10 Condition: O80||Encounter for full-term uncomplicated delivery, (2) ICD-10 Condition: O618||Other failed induction of labor, |
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
Type |
Name |
Details |
Comparator Agent |
Dinoprostone gel |
Patient lied on supine position with legs semiflexed. Bishops score assessed.Dinoprostone 2.5ml of 0.5 mg injected into the cervical canal below the internal osunder aseptic precautions . Watch for uterine contractions and featal heart rate. Reassess the bishops score after 6 hours.Dinoprostone can be repeated 6 hourly for maximum 3 dose. |
Intervention |
Foley catheter |
Under aseptic precautions bishops score assessed. Foley catheter of No.18 introduced in the cervical canal. Foley catheter balloon is filled with 50 ml of normal saline. Catheter is tagged to right thigh. Will be waited for 24 hour’s to auto expell or deflate the balloon. Reassess the bishops score. |
Comparator Agent |
Misoprostol tablet |
Patient lied on supine position with legs semiflexed. Bishops score assessed. Tablet misoprostol 25 microgram pervaginally put in the posterior fornix. Watch for uterine contractions and featal heart rate. Reassess the bishops score after 4 hours. Dose can be repeated 4 hourly for maximum of 6 dose. |
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
Age From |
19.00 Year(s) |
Age To |
40.00 Year(s) |
Gender |
Female |
Details |
Patient with
1. singleton,
2. cephalic,
3. term gestation,
4. intact membranes,
5. live fetus,
6. absence of uterine contractions,
7. Informed written consent
|
|
ExclusionCriteria |
Details |
1. Pregnancy induced hypertension,
2. fetal distress,
3. previous cesarian section,
4. uterine surgery,
5. intrauterine growth reduction ,
6. malpresentation ,
7. oligohydramnios,
8. polyhydramnios
9. diabetic mellitus
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Not Applicable |
Method of Concealment
|
Not Applicable |
Blinding/Masking
|
Open Label |
Primary Outcome
|
Outcome |
TimePoints |
rate of vaginal delivery |
24 hours after induction
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
Outcome |
TimePoints |
Rate of cesarean section
|
48 hours of induction |
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="273" Sample Size from India="273"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" |
Phase of Trial
|
Phase 4 |
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
28/04/2022 |
Date of Study Completion (India) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="1" Months="0" Days="0" |
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
|
Not Applicable |
Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Not Yet Recruiting |
Publication Details
|
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
Response - YES
- What data in particular will be shared?
Response (Others) - Nil
- What additional supporting information will be shared?
Response (Others) - NIL
- Who will be able to view these files?
Response (Others) - NIL
- For what types of analyses will this data be available?
Response (Others) - NIL
- By what mechanism will data be made available?
Response (Others) - NIL
- For how long will this data be available start date provided 21-04-2022 and end date provided 21-05-2023?
Response (Others) - NIL
- Any URL or additional information regarding plan/policy for sharing IPD?
Additional Information - NIL
|
Brief Summary
|
Induction of labour involves the artificial stimulation of uterine contractions with the aim to achieve safe vaginal delivery and performed approximately 15 percentage of all pregnancy. Induction of labour has two components. Cervical ripening and stimulation of uterus to achieve dilatation of cervix and delivery of fetus . Decision of induction of labour is taken for the benefits are more than risks of continuation of pregnancy. Foley catheter induction. acts by exerting pressure into cervical canal and seperates decidua and stimulate the local release of prostaglandins. Foley catheter is most commonly used in current clinical practice. There is reduced risk of hyperstimulation and fetal distress with Foley catheter induction of labour. Pharmacological methods being used are prostaglandins like Dinoprostone and Misoprostol. Presently misoprostol gain the popularity due to the advantages like low cost stability of drug at room temperature, easy handling, storage, easy administration and good efficiency . The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and success of pervaginal misoprostol, intracervical dinoprostone, intracervical Foley catheter for induction of labour. |