•
Fluid
administration is the first line of treatment in patients with acute
circulatory failure.
•
Fluid responsiveness
[i.e. the increase in stroke volume (SV) after a fluid challenge] is limited to
about 50% of critically ill or surgical patients.
•
Static indexes, such as
central venous pressure and pulmonary wedge pressure, are unsuited for this
purpose
•
But the dynamic indexes,
such as pulse pressure variation (PPV) and stroke volume variation (SVV),
reliably predict the effect of fluid challenge administration during controlled
mechanical ventilation when a tidal volume (VT) of at least 8 ml/kg is used.
•
Use of an intra-operative
lung-protective ventilation strategy (VT of < 8 ml/kg predicted body weight,
PBW) is now suggested as standard practice in the operating room.
•
Such small VTs limit the
assessment of fluid responsiveness in surgical patients by means of dynamic
indexes.
•
To overcome this Myatra
et al. recently proposed a new fluid responsiveness test called “the tidal
volume challengeâ€.
•
They demonstrated that an
increase in the absolute value of PPV ≥3.5% induced by a transient increase in
tidal volume from 6 to 8 mL/kg for 1 minute could reliably predict the increase
in cardiac output in response to a fluid bolus performed at a tidal volume of 6
mL/kg whereas the PPV value obtained at 6 mL/kg tidal volume was unreliable for
this purpose.
•
Similar results were
found for stroke volume variation (SVV) -threshold value: 2.5%
•
Thus, using a tidal
volume challenge might overcome the limitations of PPV as a predictive index of
fluid responsiveness during low tidal volume ventilation.
•
Recently Messina A et
al. also demonstrate that
the
•
changes in PPV and SVV obtained
after the Tidal Volume Challenge are reliable and comparable to the changes in CI
and SVI obtained after EEOT performed at 8 ml kg PBW in predicting fluid
responsiveness in neurosurgical patients.
Therefore,
we designed this study to assess the sensitivity and specificity of PPV and SVV
changes after tidal volume challenge in predicting fluid responsiveness in a
liver transplant recipient under general anaesthesia with lung-protective ventilation
Methodology
•
After
approval of the study by the institutional ethical committee & obtaining written
informed consent patients posted for liver transplant surgery will be included
in the study.
•
In all patients standard
intra-operative monitoring, including heart rate, peripheral oxygen saturation,
continuous electrocardiography, and non-invasive blood pressure monitoring will
be attached
•
Induction agents:
Fentanyl 2 mcg/kg, Propofol 1-2 mg/kg, cisatracurium besilate 0.15 to 0.2 mg/kg
•
Maintaince Agents: O2+
Air+ Isoflurane+ Intermittent cisatracurium
•
Ventilatory Setting:
Mode- Volume control, Tidal Volume- 6 ml/kg PBW, PEEP- 5, ETCO2- 30-40,
SpO2>96
•
PBW (kg) was calculated
as follows: X + 0.91[height (cm) - 152.4]; (X = 50 for men and 45.5 for women)
•
After Induction: 7.5
Fr triple lumen line inserted in the right internal jugular vein & invasive
blood pressure monitoring will be obtained by inserting a 20-G cannula into the
radial artery.
•
Hemodynamic monitoring is done by attaching the FlowTrac system to the patient
•
These are routinely done
procedures during liver transplants.
•
Baseline hemodynamic
parameters like Pulse Rate (PR), Mean arterial blood pressure(MAP), Central
Venous Pressure(CVP),Stroke Volume(SV), Stroke Volume Index (SVI), Cardiac
Index(CI), Stroke Volume Variation(SVV), Pulse Pressure Variation(PPP) will be
recorded.
The
tidal volume Challenge (VTC) test will be performed when the patient
develops hypotension (fall in Systolic Arterial Pressure > 20 % from the
baseline / MAP below 65 mm/Hg) prior to administration of fluid bolus or any
vasopressor agents. Before tidal volume challenge hemodynamic parameters like
Pulse Rate (PR), Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), Central Venous
Pressure(CVP), Stroke Volume(SV), Stroke Volume Index (SVI), Cardiac Index(CI),
Stroke Volume Variation(SVV), Pulse Pressure Variation(PPP) will be recorded.
The “tidal volume challenge†will be performed by transiently increasing tidal volume (VT) (from 6 up to 8 mL/kg PBW for 1 minute), and another set of
hemodynamic measurements including the PPV (PPV8) and SVV (SVV8) will be
recorded after 1 minute. Additionally, the changes in the value of PPV and SVV
(ΔPPV6 − 8 = PPV8 – PPV6 and ΔSVV6 − 8 = SVV8 – SVV6) will be calculated. The
tidal volume will be reduced back to 6 ml/kg PBW with the completion of TVC and
hemodynamic parameter will be recorded.
After that fluid challenge(FC) will be achieved by infusing 250 ml of plasmalyte
solution over a period of 10 mins and set of hemodynamic measurements will be
recorded. Patients will be classified as a responder if there is an increase in
Stroke Volume Index (SVI) by more than 10 % after fluid challenge. Only the hemodynamic data obtained from the
first fluid challenge administered to each enrolled patient will be used for
the analysis. For the safety of the patient, the interruption of the protocol
will be at the discretion of the attending anaesthetist.