|
This study aims to identify NSTEMI patients with
total and non-total occlusion and correlate their ECG, Echocardiogram,
Angiographic parameters and their clinical outcomes. The patients who have an acute chest pain and
cardiomyocyte necrosis as evidenced by troponin elevation are labelled as
NSTEMI. These individuals may present with ongoing ischemia, electrical or
hemodynamic instability and require angiography and appropriate revascularization
at the earliest. The clinical presentation depends on the severity of coronary
stenosis and the degree of thrombus. TIMI risk score is easy to use in day to
day clinical practice and can be accessed at www.timi.org. A low TIMI score
indicates intermediate or high risk.
1.3
Potential
Benefits
As this is an observational study,
there is no direct benefit from this study for the patient. However all
patients enrolled in this study will be followed up until the completion of
this study. Furthermore, this study will be of help to the community by
contributing to medical research.
To assess the Electro and
Echocardiogram, angiographic parameters, In hospital and one year clinical outcomes of patients with occlusive
NSTEMI Versus Non occlusive NSTEMI.
3.0
ENDPOINTS
MACE
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
3.2 Secondary
Endpoint
Death
Stroke
Readmission
48 hours Troponin
Reinfarction
Target Lesion Failure (TLF)
Bleeding
In this study, approximately 1,000 patients multicentre of either
sex, aged 18 and above years with acute
NSTEMI.
4.1
Subject selection
Subject selection will be done under the supervision of
the investigator at each site, following approval of the study protocol by the
Ethics committee and CTRI Registration. Signed informed consent must be
obtained from the patient/ LAR, following which the patient will be screened
and eligible patients will be enrolled into the study. Approximately 1,000
patients multicentric diagnosed with NSTEMI.
All patients presenting with angina or ECG features and
raised Troponin levels suggestive of NSTEMI are included.
4.2
Exclusion
Criteria
Patients presenting
with diagnosis other than NSTEMI.
This study
will be a prospective, observational study conducted upto 10 centers in
patients with NSTEMI of total occlusion and Non total occlusion. Patient’s
demographic, clinical, electrocardiographic parameters are noted on admission. All
patients included in the study undergo immediate transthoracic
echocardiographic examination at emergency department. Timing of intervention
and mode of revascularization are left to the treating physician’s discretion.
The timing of revascularization and angiographic details are noted. Patients major cardiovascular events (non-fatal
MI, target vessel revascularization and death) are noted during hospital stay
and 1 year follow up.
5.1. Study Procedures
5.1.1
Screening
/Baseline
The available data pertaining to screening/
baseline will be captured in the spreadsheet.
Patients in the age group of 18 and
above will be provided with the IEC/IRB approved written informed consent
document. Informed Consent Document should be signed by the patient / LAR
before baseline or screening procedures
The
following parameters will be collected:
1. A list of presenting complaints
2. Demographic details: The
demographic details of the patient such as age (in years), height (in
centimeters), weight (in kilograms), and gender (male or female) will be
collected.
3. Family history, Medical history
and Medication history of the patients will be collected
4. Details pertaining to duration of chest pain, , vital signs (Heart
rate, Blood pressure), Killip class
5. Electrocardiogram (ECG)
6.
Echocardiogram done in standard parasternal view and apical views
were assessed for cardiac dimension, endocardial wall thickness, Left Ventricular
Ejection Fraction (LVEF), Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), Regional
wall motion abnormality (RWMA) and ACS complications. Images are acquired and
stored in Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) format.
7.
To enable quick assessment and uniform reporting following
echocardiogram values are assessed and entered on this format.
8.
Left ventricular end diastolic and systolic dimension
(Normal/Dilated)
9.
Right ventricular size (Normal/Dilated)
10. Left ventricular
endocardial wall thickness (None/Thin/Mild/Moderate/Severe)
11. Left ventricular
ejection fraction (simpson/eyeball assessment)
- Normal/Mild/Moderate/Severe
12. Right ventricular
ejection fraction - TAPSE
13. Regional wall motion
abnormality (16 segments) – Present/Absent;
If present- number of segments out of 16
14. Possible coronary
artery disease territory – Left anterior descending artery (LAD), Left
circumflex artery (LCX), Right coronary artery (RCA)
15. Complications of ACS-
Mitral Regurgitation (MR) with severity, Ventricular septal rupture (VSR),
pericardial effusion (PE)
16. Complete Haemogram, Random blood
sugar, Lipid profile, Blood urea, serum creatinine, Sodium, Potassium
17. Cardiac markers including Creatine
Phosphokinase test (CPK), CK-MB fraction and the 0hr,1hr and 48 hrs Troponin levels
18. Adverse events
19. Duration of hospital stay
5.1.2
Other data to be collected following
enrollment
The data pertaining to the tests/
procedures performed, AE, SAE and concomitant medication administered during
the hospitalization for all the patients enrolled will be collected and entered
in spreadsheets.
5.1.3
1 year
from the day of enrollment
The following
information will be collected during 1 year from the day of enrollment if
available or the patients will be contacted telephonically to assess
their health status:
·
MACE
·
DEATH
·
LV
function
·
Target
Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
The investigator will
assess and record any adverse event, reportable events in detail including the
date of onset, event diagnosis (if known) or sign/symptom, severity, time
course, duration and outcome, relationship of the adverse event to the treatment/procedure
and any action(s) taken.
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward
medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered
a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal
relationship with this treatment. An AE
can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal
laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of
a medicinal product, whether or not related to the medicinal product .This includes
the following:
§
Any
clinically significant worsening of a pre-existing condition.
§
Any
reoccurrence of a pre-existing condition.
A pre-existing
condition is a clinical condition (including the condition being treated) that
is diagnosed before the subject signs the informed consent form and that is
documented as part of the subject’s medical history.
An AE is considered
to be treatment emergent if
(1) It was not
present when the active phase of the study began and is not a chronic condition
that is part of the subject’s medical history
(2) It was present at
the start of the active phase of the study or as part of the subject’s medical
history, but the severity or frequency increased during the active phase.
Serious
Adverse Events
Serious adverse events
like Death, Life-threatening condition and persistent or significant disability
or incapacity will be reported to the ethics committee and all participating
investigators.
Death
of Subject: An
event that results in the death of a subject.
Life-Threatening:
An event that,
in the opinion of the investigator, would have resulted in immediate fatality
if medical intervention had not been taken.
This does not include an event that would have been fatal if it had
occurred in a more severe form.
Persistent
or Significant Disability / Incapacity: An event that results in a condition that
substantially interferes with the activities of daily living of a study subject.
Disability is not intended to include experiences of relatively minor medical
significance such as headache, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, influenza, and
accidental trauma (e.g.,
sprained ankle).
Submission of reports
regarding AE and SAE will be as per the Ethics Committee requirements.
Significant expected
Adverse Events may involve:
·
Intracranial
haemorrhage or significant bleeding
·
Recurrent
myocardial infarction
·
Death
·
Restenosis
All AEs will be
entered on spreadsheets.
The
following AE information must be included (when applicable):
The specific
condition or event; whether the condition was pre-existing (i.e. an acute
condition present at the start of the study or history of a chronic condition)
and, if so, whether it has worsened (e.g. in severity and/or frequency); the
dates and times of occurrence; severity; action taken; and outcome. Laboratory
abnormalities found to be of clinical significance may be reported as AEs.
The details of AEs
and SAEs should be collected from the time of obtaining the informed consent.
SAEs that are not treatment/ procedure related may nevertheless be considered
by the participating investigators or the medical monitor (or designee) to be
related to the conduct of the clinical study, i.e. to a patient’s participation
in the study.
The
causal relationship of AEs to the study drug will be rated as follows:
1.
Related
– Events that are procedure related example: stent thrombosis
2.
Unrelated
- Events that are not procedure related example: fracture of leg due to
accidental fall
The aim is to evaluate the
clinical and angiographic outcomes of patients with occlusive Non-ST elevation
myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) as compared to Non-occlusive NSTEMI undergoing
percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
A sample size of 1,000 patients
multicentric is considered sufficient to provide the basis for future pivotal
study.
7.3
Analysis
Populations
No of patients enrolled for 1
year in both arms together. Estimated around 1000 patients
Patient’s demographic, clinical;
electro cardiographic and echocardiographic parameters are noted on admission.
Timing of intervention and mode of revascularization are left to the treating physician’s
discretion. The timing of revascularization and angiographic details are noted.
Patients major cardiovascular events (non-fatal MI, target vessel
revascularization and death) are noted during hospital stay and 1 year follow
up. The patient’s inclusion to the Per-Protocol and Safety Population will also
be summarized. All demographic data will be listed.
Safety analysis will
be performed on the Safety population. Safety and tolerability will be assessed
in terms of adverse events, laboratory data, vital sign data, which will be
collected for all patients. Appropriate summaries of these data will be
presented. Concomitant medications will be tabulated by patient with drug
category and preferred term.
Continuous variables
will be summarized using descriptive statistics and the categorical data will
be presented as numbers with percentages. The time-delays are presented as
medians with 25th and 75th percentiles. Appropriate test will be used for
comparison of categorical and continuous variables.
Detailed
methodology for summary and statistical analyses of the data collected in this
observational study will be documented.
8.0 Source
Documents and Access to Source Data/Documents
All source documents will be
stored in their respective sites. Access
to source data if necessary at the time of data analysis or any query
clarification it can be done by the respective sites.
Original
source document data will be entered and the same will be complete in
Spreadsheets.
8.1.1 Source Documents
Source documents are
defined as original documents, data and records. This may include hospital records, clinical charts,
laboratory data, and recorded data from automated instruments and/or
x-rays. Data collected during this study
must be recorded on the spreadsheets.
The
investigator(s)/institution(s) will permit study-related monitoring, audits,
IEC/IRB review, and regulatory inspection(s), providing direct access to source
data documents.
Data will be collected from the
patients’ file regarding all the tests and procedures that were performed to assess
their condition.
8.0
8.1
8.1.1
8.1.2
Access
to Source Data/Documents
As
required by the ICH GCP guidelines and regulatory authorities the investigator
will allow direct access to all pertinent medical records in order to allow for
the verification of data gathered in the spreadsheets and for the review of the
data collection process. The records, including source documentation, must also
be available for inspection by relevant regulatory health authorities.
8.1.3
Spreadsheet
Spreadsheet (Excel) must be
completed for each subject screened/enrolled in this study. The spreadsheet data for this study will be collected
and same will be validated for the study-specific.
The investigator/hospital staff
will document subject data in his/her own subject files. These subject files will serve as source data
for the study. All data required by this
protocol will be recorded by investigative site personnel in the spreadsheet. All data entered into the spreadsheet will be
supported by source documentation. Vital status and clinical outcome will be
determined for all patients and reported on appropriate entry.
The investigator or an authorized
member of the investigator’s site will make any necessary corrections to the spreadsheet
before sending it to The Madras Medical Mission.
By signing this
protocol, the investigator agrees to be responsible for ensuring that a quality
control and quality assurance systems with written standard operating
procedures (SOP) will be in place to ensure that the study will be conducted
and data will be generated, documented, and reported in compliance with the
protocol, accepted standards of Good Clinical Practice, and all applicable local
laws, rules and regulations relating to the conduct of the clinical study.
This study will be
conducted in accordance with the ethical principles that have their origin in
the current Declaration of Helsinki with ethics approval and will be consistent
with ICH GCP and applicable regulatory requirements. The study will be registered
under CTRI. The study will be conducted in compliance with the protocol.
The rights, safety
and well-being of the study subjects are the most important considerations and
should prevail over interests of society and science.
GCP requires that the
clinical protocol, any protocol amendments, the informed consent and all other
forms of subject information related to the study (e.g., advertisements used to
recruit subjects) and any other necessary documents be reviewed by an IEC/IRB. The IEC/IRB will review the ethical,
scientific and medical appropriateness of the study before it is
conducted. IEC/IRB approval of the
protocol, informed consent and subject information and/or advertising, as
relevant, will be obtained prior to the start of the study.
Any amendments to the
protocol will require IEC/IRB approval prior to implementation of any changes
made to the study design. The
investigator will be required to submit, maintain and archive study essential
documents for 5 years.
Obtaining consent is
the responsibility of the Investigator. Prior to the beginning of the study,
the Investigator must have the IEC/ IRB written approval of the written informed
consent form and any other information to be provided to the patients.
The investigator must
provide the subject or legally acceptable representative (if applicable) with a
copy of the consent form and written information about the study in the
language in which the subject is most proficient. The language must be
non-technical and easily understood by the subject.
The Investigator
should allow time sufficient for subject or subject’s (LAR) legally acceptable
representative to clarify the details of the study decide and then informed
consent must be signed and personally dated by the subject or the subject’s
legally acceptable representative and by the person who conducted the informed
consent discussion.
The subject or
legally acceptable representative should receive a copy of the signed informed
consent and any other written information provided to study subjects prior to
subject’s participation in the trial.
If the subject or LAR
is unable to read, a reliable and impartial witness should be present during
the entire informed consent discussion. The choice of the witness must not
breach the subject’s rights to confidentiality. A reliable independent witness
is defined as one not affiliated with the institution or engaged in the
investigation. A family member or acquaintance is appropriate independent
witnesses.
The informed consent
and any other information provided to subjects or the subject’s LAR, should be
revised whenever important new information becomes available that is relevant
to the subject’s consent, and should receive IRB/IEC approval/favorable opinion
prior to use.
By signing this protocol,
the investigator affirms that information provided to the investigator(s) will
be maintained in confidence and such information will be divulged to the
IRB/IEC or other regulatory authorities, or similar or expert committee;
affiliated institution; and employees only under an appropriate understanding
of confidentiality with such board or committee, affiliated institution and
employees. Data generated by this study will be considered confidential by the
investigator, except to the extent that it is included in a publication as
provided in Publications.
By signing this
protocol, the investigator agrees that the IRB/IEC or regulatory agency
representatives may consult and/or copy study documents in order to verify data.
By signing the consent form, the subject agrees to this process. If study
documents will be photocopied during the process of verifying information, the
subject will be identified by unique code and initials; full names will be
masked prior to transmission to all the participating investigators, IRB/IEC or
regulatory agency.
If a trial is
prematurely terminated or suspended, the investigator should promptly inform
the Ethics committee of the termination or suspension and the reason (s) for
the termination or suspension. The IRB/IEC should also be informed promptly and
provide the reason(s) for the termination or suspension by the
investigator/institution, as specified by the applicable regulatory requirement(s).
The investigator will
conduct the study in compliance with the protocol and complete the study within
the timeframe specified in the contract. Continuation of this study beyond this
date must be mutually agreed upon in writing by all the participating
investigators.
The investigator will
conduct the study in compliance with the protocol and complete the study within
the timeframe specified and agreed upon by all the participating investigators.
Continuation of this study beyond this date must be mutually agreed upon in
writing by all the participating investigators. The investigator will provide a
final report to the IEC/IRB following conclusion of the study.
It is the
responsibility of the Investigator to maintain a comprehensive and centralized
filing system of all relevant documentation. The CRO will ensure that
appropriate training is given to the study site personnel and any new
information relevant to the performance of this study will be forwarded to the
staff involved.
Copies of all
pertinent records will be retained by the Investigator for at least 5 years.
These records include documents pertaining to IRB/IEC, informed consent, source
documents, as well as eCRFs. No documents shall be transferred from the site or
destroyed without first notifying the participating investigators. If the
Investigator withdraws from the study, the records shall be transferred to a
mutually agreed upon designee. Notice of such transfer will be given in writing
to all the participating investigators if the investigator is not able to
retain the records, he/she must notify all the participating investigators to
arrange alternative archiving options.
All information
supplied by the investigator in connection with this study and not previously
published, is considered confidential information. This information includes,
but is not limited to, data, materials (i.e., the clinical protocol, CRFs),
equipment, experience (whether of a scientific, technical, engineering,
operational or commercial nature), designs, specifications, know-how, product
uses, processes, formulae, costs, financial data, marketing plans and direct
selling systems, customer lists and technical and commercial information
relating to customers or business projections used by the investigators in its
business. Any data, inventions or discoveries collected or developed, as a
result of this study is considered confidential. This confidential information
shall remain the sole property of all the participating investigators, shall
not be disclosed to any unauthorized person or used in any unauthorized manner
without written consent of all the participating investigators and shall not be
used except in the performance of the study.
No publication or
disclosure of study results will be permitted, except under the terms and
conditions of a separate, written agreement between the investigator and / or
the investigator’s institution.
The investigator must
have the opportunity to review and approve all proposed abstracts, manuscripts,
or presentations regarding this study sixty (60) days prior to submission for
publication/presentation. Any information identified by the investigator as
confidential must be deleted prior to submission.
|