FULL DETAILS (Read-only)  -> Click Here to Create PDF for Current Dataset of Trial
CTRI Number  CTRI/2015/06/005919 [Registered on: 16/06/2015] Trial Registered Retrospectively
Last Modified On: 15/06/2015
Post Graduate Thesis  Yes 
Type of Trial  Interventional 
Type of Study   Medical Device 
Study Design  Randomized, Parallel Group, Active Controlled Trial 
Public Title of Study   Comparison of different methods of airway management in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries. 
Scientific Title of Study   Comparison of Supreme and Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy 
Trial Acronym  RACE 
Secondary IDs if Any  
Secondary ID  Identifier 
NIL  NIL 
 
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)  
Name  Nitika Goel 
Designation  Postgraduate Junior Resident 
Affiliation  Government Medical College Hospital Chandigarh 
Address  Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive care, Government Medical College Hospital, Sector 32, Chandigarh
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive care, Government Medical College Hospital, Sector 32, Chandigarh
Chandigarh
CHANDIGARH
160032
India 
Phone  8826622159  
Fax    
Email  nitikagoel7@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Scientific Query
 
Name  L K Anand 
Designation  Associate Professor 
Affiliation  Government Medical College Hospital Chandigarh 
Address  Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive care, Government Medical College Hospital, Sector 32, Chandigarh
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive care, Government Medical College Hospital, Sector 32, Chandigarh
Chandigarh
CHANDIGARH
160032
India 
Phone  9646121522  
Fax    
Email  lkanand11@yahoo.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Public Query
 
Name  L K Anand 
Designation  Associate Professor 
Affiliation  Government Medical College Hospital Chandigarh 
Address  Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive care, Government Medical College Hospital, Sector 32, Chandigarh
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive care, Government Medical College Hospital, Sector 32, Chandigarh
Chandigarh
CHANDIGARH
160032
India 
Phone  9646121522  
Fax    
Email  lkanand11@yahoo.com  
 
Source of Monetary or Material Support  
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive care, Government Medical College Hospital, Sector 32, Chandigarh 
 
Primary Sponsor  
Name  Govt Medical College and Hospital 
Address  Govt. Medical College and Hospital Sector 32 Chandigarh 
Type of Sponsor  Government medical college 
 
Details of Secondary Sponsor  
Name  Address 
NIL  NIL 
 
Countries of Recruitment     India  
Sites of Study  
No of Sites = 1  
Name of Principal Investigator  Name of Site  Site Address  Phone/Fax/Email 
Dr Lakesh Anand  Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care  Govt. Medical College and Hospital, Sector 32, Chandigarh
Chandigarh
CHANDIGARH 
09646121522

lkanand11@gmail.com 
 
Details of Ethics Committee  
No of Ethics Committees= 1  
Name of Committee  Approval Status 
Institutional Ethics Committee  Approved 
 
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI  
Status 
Not Applicable 
 
Health Condition / Problems Studied  
Health Type  Condition 
Patients  Patients with Gall Bladder Stone disease for elective cholecystectomy were chosen. Pateints with mouth opening less than 2.5 cm,with upper respiratory tract infection were excluded. ,  
 
Intervention / Comparator Agent  
Type  Name  Details 
Comparator Agent  Proseal LMA  Modified version of classic LMA, offering a more effective seal around the glottis with a drain tube as a bypass channel for gastric access, designed to improve controlled ventilation, airway protection and diagnosis of misplacement. 
Intervention  Supreme LMA  New supraglottic airway device that presents combined features pf Proseal LMA, Fastrach LMA and Unique LMA. Clinical and fibreoptic evaluation of SLMA showed easy insertion, optimal laryngeal fit and low airway morbidity. 
 
Inclusion Criteria  
Age From  20.00 Year(s)
Age To  60.00 Year(s)
Gender  Both 
Details  1. Age group b/w 20 to 60 years
2. American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) physical status I and II
3. Patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia.
 
 
ExclusionCriteria 
Details  The following patients were excluded from the study.
1. Patients with known or predicted difficult airway or MPG III/IV.
2. Patients with mouth opening of less than 2.5 cm. .
3. Patients with history of upper respiratory tract infection.
4. Patients with increased risk of regurgitation and aspiration.
5. Patients with a body mass index (BMI) > 35 kg.m.-2
6. Patients unable to understand the study protocol.
 
 
Method of Generating Random Sequence   Coin toss, Lottery, toss of dice, shuffling cards etc 
Method of Concealment   Other 
Blinding/Masking   Outcome Assessor Blinded 
Primary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
Ease of insertion of equipment,
Cuff Pressure of equipment,
oropharyngeal leak pressure 
Time for successful insertion of equipment and time of insertion of orogastric tube 
 
Secondary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
Any morbidity,adverse effect  In first 24 hours 
 
Target Sample Size   Total Sample Size="80"
Sample Size from India="80" 
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= ""
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="" 
Phase of Trial   N/A 
Date of First Enrollment (India)   05/05/2010 
Date of Study Completion (India) Date Missing 
Date of First Enrollment (Global)  Date Missing 
Date of Study Completion (Global) Date Missing 
Estimated Duration of Trial   Years="3"
Months="0"
Days="0" 
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)   Not Applicable 
Recruitment Status of Trial (India)  Completed 
Publication Details   presently no publication of the study has been made. 
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement

Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?  

Brief Summary   The primary purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy between Supreme laryngeal mask airway and Proseal laryngeal mask airway in laparoscopic surgeries and to study any difference between hemodynamic and ventilatory parameters between the two groups. Supreme laryngeal mask airway was found to be more efficacious in terms of ease and time of insertion of laryngeal mask airway. However no difference was found in the hemodynamic and ventilatory parameters between the two groups. 
Close