CTRI Number |
CTRI/2015/06/005919 [Registered on: 16/06/2015] Trial Registered Retrospectively |
Last Modified On: |
15/06/2015 |
Post Graduate Thesis |
Yes |
Type of Trial |
Interventional |
Type of Study
|
Medical Device |
Study Design |
Randomized, Parallel Group, Active Controlled Trial |
Public Title of Study
|
Comparison of different methods of airway management in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries. |
Scientific Title of Study
|
Comparison of Supreme and Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy |
Trial Acronym |
RACE |
Secondary IDs if Any
|
Secondary ID |
Identifier |
NIL |
NIL |
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
Name |
Nitika Goel |
Designation |
Postgraduate Junior Resident |
Affiliation |
Government Medical College Hospital Chandigarh |
Address |
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive care, Government Medical College Hospital, Sector 32, Chandigarh Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive care, Government Medical College Hospital, Sector 32, Chandigarh Chandigarh CHANDIGARH 160032 India |
Phone |
8826622159 |
Fax |
|
Email |
nitikagoel7@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
Name |
L K Anand |
Designation |
Associate Professor |
Affiliation |
Government Medical College Hospital Chandigarh |
Address |
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive care, Government Medical College Hospital, Sector 32, Chandigarh Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive care, Government Medical College Hospital, Sector 32, Chandigarh Chandigarh CHANDIGARH 160032 India |
Phone |
9646121522 |
Fax |
|
Email |
lkanand11@yahoo.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
Name |
L K Anand |
Designation |
Associate Professor |
Affiliation |
Government Medical College Hospital Chandigarh |
Address |
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive care, Government Medical College Hospital, Sector 32, Chandigarh Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive care, Government Medical College Hospital, Sector 32, Chandigarh Chandigarh CHANDIGARH 160032 India |
Phone |
9646121522 |
Fax |
|
Email |
lkanand11@yahoo.com |
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive care, Government Medical College Hospital, Sector 32, Chandigarh |
|
Primary Sponsor
|
Name |
Govt Medical College and Hospital |
Address |
Govt. Medical College and Hospital
Sector 32
Chandigarh |
Type of Sponsor |
Government medical college |
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
Sites of Study
|
No of Sites = 1 |
Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
Dr Lakesh Anand |
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care |
Govt. Medical College and Hospital,
Sector 32, Chandigarh Chandigarh CHANDIGARH |
09646121522
lkanand11@gmail.com |
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
Institutional Ethics Committee |
Approved |
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
Health Type |
Condition |
Patients |
Patients with Gall Bladder Stone disease for elective cholecystectomy were chosen. Pateints with mouth opening less than 2.5 cm,with upper respiratory tract infection were excluded. , |
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
Type |
Name |
Details |
Comparator Agent |
Proseal LMA |
Modified version of classic LMA, offering a more effective seal around the glottis with a drain tube as a bypass channel for gastric access, designed to improve controlled ventilation, airway protection and diagnosis of misplacement. |
Intervention |
Supreme LMA |
New supraglottic airway device that presents combined features pf Proseal LMA, Fastrach LMA and Unique LMA. Clinical and fibreoptic evaluation of SLMA showed easy insertion, optimal laryngeal fit and low airway morbidity. |
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
Age From |
20.00 Year(s) |
Age To |
60.00 Year(s) |
Gender |
Both |
Details |
1. Age group b/w 20 to 60 years
2. American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) physical status I and II
3. Patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia.
|
|
ExclusionCriteria |
Details |
The following patients were excluded from the study.
1. Patients with known or predicted difficult airway or MPG III/IV.
2. Patients with mouth opening of less than 2.5 cm. .
3. Patients with history of upper respiratory tract infection.
4. Patients with increased risk of regurgitation and aspiration.
5. Patients with a body mass index (BMI) > 35 kg.m.-2
6. Patients unable to understand the study protocol.
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Coin toss, Lottery, toss of dice, shuffling cards etc |
Method of Concealment
|
Other |
Blinding/Masking
|
Outcome Assessor Blinded |
Primary Outcome
|
Outcome |
TimePoints |
Ease of insertion of equipment,
Cuff Pressure of equipment,
oropharyngeal leak pressure |
Time for successful insertion of equipment and time of insertion of orogastric tube |
|
Secondary Outcome
|
Outcome |
TimePoints |
Any morbidity,adverse effect |
In first 24 hours |
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="80" Sample Size from India="80"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= ""
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="" |
Phase of Trial
|
N/A |
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
05/05/2010 |
Date of Study Completion (India) |
Date Missing |
Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Date Missing |
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="3" Months="0" Days="0" |
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
|
Not Applicable |
Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Completed |
Publication Details
|
presently no publication of the study has been made. |
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
|
Brief Summary
|
The primary purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy between Supreme laryngeal mask airway and Proseal laryngeal mask airway in laparoscopic surgeries and to study any difference between hemodynamic and ventilatory parameters between the two groups. Supreme laryngeal mask airway was found to be more efficacious in terms of ease and time of insertion of laryngeal mask airway. However no difference was found in the hemodynamic and ventilatory parameters between the two groups. |