Introduction:
Postmastectomy
breast reconstruction has become an increasingly important component of breast
cancer treatment.[1]
Breast
reconstruction is a valuable adjunct to the treatment for breast cancer. Deep
inferior epigastric perforator flap can be used for breast reconstruction where
in skin, fat and blood vessels are cut from the wall of lower abdomen and moved
up to chest to rebuild breast and micro anastomosis done.
Multiple small
sensory nerves may be injured during breast surgery when breast tissue is
surgically removed from the chest, sensory nerves travelling through these
tissues are transacted, stretched or caught up in scar during healing process.
Nerves innervating the
rectus abdominis are at risk during DIEP flap harvest. For the majority of
patients, acute postoperative pain following breast reconstruction is an
expected surgical outcome that readily resolves with time and acute pain
intervention. However, patients who suffer poorly controlled postoperative pain
understandably report less satisfaction with their surgical experience.[1]
Adequate
control of postoperative pain directly improves patient satisfaction and
outcomes.[2]
In addition,
undermanaged acute postsurgical pain can lead to greater postoperative clinical
morbidity and higher hospital costs. For a surprising and unfortunate number of
patients, acute postoperative pain persists beyond the normal course of
postsurgical recovery, and more severe postoperative pain is established as a
robust risk factor for the development of potentially debilitating chronic
pain.[1]
We therefore propose to
assess the pain severity in these patients and type of pain and quality of life
following DIEP surgery.
Chemotherapy and
radiotherapy can be additional sources of pain and related symptoms.
Neuropathic
pain is defined as pain caused by a primary lesion or dysfunction in nervous
system [3]. It is often chronic and debilitating in nature, disrupting quality
of life and posing huge morbidity and financial burden.[4]
AIMS
AND OBJECTIVES
Primary
Objective:
Pain severity on day 1,2,3, and 1month, 3
months after surgery.
Secondary Objective:
1. Type
of pain from
pain descriptors and neuropathic pain questionnaire (Pain DETECT) at 1 month,3
months after surgery.
2. Impact on quality
of life before
recruitment and 1 month,3 months
after surgery.
INCLUSION CRITERIA
1.
All
female patients undergoing breast reconstruction with DIEP flap.
2. Patients giving consent
preoperatively and willing to be contacted
telephonically for pain related information.
3. Patients willing
to post the quality of life questionnaires at appropriate
intervals.
EXCLUSION CRITERIA
1.
Refusal
of consent.
2.
DIEP
done following failure of first reconstruction.
STUDY
METHODOLOGY
This is a prospective,
observational study over a period of 1 year with follow up for 3 months.
After IEC approval, all
patients undergoing breast surgery with DIEP flap reconstruction would be
enrolled in the study after obtaining informed consent preoperatively.
Details of the patient can
be obtained from the patient files, Anesthesia records and electronic medical
record.
Pain scores
will be assessed using numerical rating scale (mild 1-3,moderate 4-6,greater
than 7 severe).Pain scores both average and worst on post operative day 1,2,3 and thereafter 1,3 months can be recorded
telephonically.
Patients with
pain uncontrolled by regular analgesics prescribed by the surgical team would
be referred for further input and management to acute pain service. Analgesics
used will be noted both in the immediate postoperative period as well as at 1
month and 3 months from the date of surgery. Radiation therapy and chemotherapy
details will be obtained from electronic medical record.
Type of pain
from pain descriptors (stabbing, pricking, burning, numbness etc) and
neuropathic pain questionnaire (Pain DETECT) at 1 month,3 months.
It is a self-
reported questionnaire that is filled out by patients themselves. It consists
of 9 items: 7 sensory symptom items, including burning, tingling, or prickling
sensations, tactile and thermal allodynia, electric shock-like sensations,
numbness, and pressure-evoked pain sensation, that are graded from 0 to 5 on a
Likert-type scale indicating never to very strongly agree. 1 temporal item on pain
course pattern graded from -1 to +1; and 1 spatial item on pain radiation
graded from 0 for no radiation to +2 for radiating pain.
The total
score calculated from the 9 items ranges from -1 to 38, with higher scores
indicating higher levels of NeP. [4]
Quality of
life at the time of recruitment and 1 month,3 months after surgery can be
assessed with the help of questionnaire given to the patients before discharge
which has to be filled duly by the patients and post them at appropriate
intervals,
The impact on
quality of life will be assessed from the EORTC-QLQ 30 questionnaire that will
be completed by the patient, participant will required approximately 20 to 30
minutes to complete the questionnaire.
Details of postoperative
complication such as local infection, postoperative hematoma, venous
congestion, flap necrosis will also be recorded.
Participant with uncontrolled pain by regular
analgesics prescribed by the surgical team will be referred for further
management to acute pain service and to chronic pain services or palliative
medicine department if needed.
Sample Size
A convenient
sampling technique will be used for enrollment and sample size calculation. All
female patients undergoing breast reconstruction with DIEP flap over a period
of 1 year starting immediately after IEC approval date with follow up for 3
months will be screen. We are expecting a 8 to 9 participant enrollment per
month hence approximately 100 participants will be enrolled in the study.
STATISTICAL
ANALYSIS PLAN:
Pain severity
will be assessed using numerical rating scale (mild 1-3, moderate 4-6, greater
than 7 severe) and will be presented as counts and percentage on day 1, 2, 3,
after 1 month,3 months after surgery. Type of pain from pain descriptors will
be presented as counts and percentage with (95 % C.I.).
Neuropathic
pain score will be calculate using scoring manual and presented as counts and
percentage. Quality of life scoring will be done using QLQ-C30 scoring manual
and presented as mean (sd). All analysis will be done using SPSS version 25.
BUDGET
No additional
procedure would be performed on the patients, neither will the study add to the
cost of the patient’s care. This study would not incur any additional cost on
the patient or on TMH. Hence funding will not be required to carry out this
study.
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS
This is a
non-interventional study which does not alter the method of treatment or care
offered to patient by any mean. |