CTRI Number |
CTRI/2013/04/003584 [Registered on: 26/04/2013] Trial Registered Prospectively |
Last Modified On: |
16/11/2019 |
Post Graduate Thesis |
No |
Type of Trial |
Interventional |
Type of Study
|
Other (Specify) [Prospective feasibility trial] |
Study Design |
Non-randomized, Active Controlled Trial |
Public Title of Study
|
A trial to see a new technique to drain bile in patients whom standard methods of biliary drainage have failed in patients of biliary tract cancer |
Scientific Title of Study
|
EUS-Guided Biliary Drainage in Patients with Inoperable Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction and Failed ERCP: a Prospective Feasibility Multicenter Trial |
Trial Acronym |
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
Secondary ID |
Identifier |
NIL |
NIL |
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
Name |
Dr Pramod Garg |
Designation |
Additional Professor |
Affiliation |
AIIMS, New Delhi |
Address |
Department of Gastroenterology, AIIMS
South DELHI 110029 India |
Phone |
011-26593556 |
Fax |
|
Email |
pgarg10@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
Name |
Dr Pramod Garg |
Designation |
Additional Professor |
Affiliation |
AIIMS, New Delhi |
Address |
Department of Gastroenterology, AIIMS
South DELHI 110029 India |
Phone |
011-26593556 |
Fax |
|
Email |
pgarg10@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
Name |
Dr Pramod Garg |
Designation |
Additional Professor |
Affiliation |
AIIMS, New Delhi |
Address |
Department of Gastroenterology, AIIMS
South DELHI 110029 India |
Phone |
011-26593556 |
Fax |
|
Email |
pgarg10@gmail.com |
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
Name |
All India Instittue of Medical Sciences |
Address |
Ansari Nagar, New Delhi |
Type of Sponsor |
Research institution and hospital |
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India United States of America |
Sites of Study
|
No of Sites = 1 |
Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
Dr Pramod Garg |
All India Institute of Medical Sciences |
Department of Gastroenterology, Ansari Nagar South DELHI |
011-26593556
pgarg10@gmail.com |
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
No of Ethics Committees= 2 |
Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
Institution Ethics Committee, All India Institute of Medical Sciences |
Approved |
JHM-IRB 3 |
Approved |
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
Modification(s)
|
Health Type |
Condition |
Patients |
Inoperable cases of malignant biliary obstruction and with failed ERCP, (1) ICD-10 Condition: O||Medical and Surgical, |
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
Type |
Name |
Details |
Intervention |
EUS guided biliary drainage |
EUS guided biliary duct will be punctured, guidewire will be advanced through the needle into the bile duct. The bile duct will be cannulated next to the in situ wire using a sphicterotome preloaded with another wire. Sphincterotomy will be done. A stent will be advanced over the wire into the bile duct and deployed under fluoroscopic and endoscopic guidance. |
Comparator Agent |
None |
No comparotor arm used |
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
Age From |
18.00 Year(s) |
Age To |
80.00 Year(s) |
Gender |
Both |
Details |
1. Consecutive adult patients (18-80 years of age) with jaundice due to inoperable (by EUS and/or CT criteria or due to health status) malignant distal (more than 2cm distal to hilum) biliary obstruction and who have failed prior ERCP attempt. Failure is considered to be 2 unsuccessful attempts, according to each institution’s definition of “failed†procedure (patients may be consented for EGBD prior to repeat ERCP due to higher likelihood of failure). One failure at outside institution and one failure at our institution can be considered as total of two failures.
2. Ability to give informed consent
|
|
ExclusionCriteria |
Details |
1. Unable to give informed consent
2. Life expectancy < 1month
3. Pregnant or breastfeeding women
4. Acute gastrointestinal bleeding
5. Coagulopathy defined by prothrombin time < 50% of control; PTT > 50 sec, or INR > 1.5), on chronic anticoagulation, or platelet count <50,000
6. Inability to tolerate sedated upper endoscopy due to cardio-pulmonary instability or other contraindication to endoscopy
7. Prior total gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, esophagectomy and sleeve gastrectomy
8. Cirrhosis with portal hypertension, varices, and/or ascites
9. Liver metastases burden > 30%
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Not Applicable |
Method of Concealment
|
Not Applicable |
Blinding/Masking
|
Not Applicable |
Primary Outcome
|
Outcome |
TimePoints |
Safety of the procedure |
1 week |
|
Secondary Outcome
|
Outcome |
TimePoints |
1.Effectiveness
2.Quality of life (QOL)
3.Procedure-related costs
4.Number of required procedures
5.Technical success
6.Stent patency
|
4 weeks |
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="20" Sample Size from India="10"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" |
Phase of Trial
|
N/A |
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
29/04/2013 |
Date of Study Completion (India) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
29/04/2013 |
Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="2" Months="0" Days="0" |
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
|
Not Yet Recruiting |
Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Not Yet Recruiting |
Publication Details
|
None yet |
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
|
Brief Summary
|
EUS guided biliary drainage (EGBD) is a less invasive approach compared to radiologic or surgical methods of biliary drainage. This study is a done to prove the feasibility of EGBD with the future goal of comparing it with percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in a randomized trial.
The study hypothesis is that EGBD is equally effective and safe to PTBD and is associated with better quality of life than PTBD in patients with inoperable malignant distal biliary obstruction who have failed prior ERCP. EGBD may be associated with decreased procedure related costs. Patients who undergo PTBD usually require multiple procedures for stent exchange/ upsize. |