| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2021/09/036356 [Registered on: 08/09/2021] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
26/05/2022 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
Yes |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Dentistry |
| Study Design |
Randomized, Parallel Group Trial |
|
Public Title of Study
|
Comparison of stability and hard tissue changes between trabecular and laser microfused implants. |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
ASSESSMENT OF IMPLANT STABILITY AND CRESTAL BONE LEVEL IN EARLY LOADED TRABECULAR AND LASER MICROFUSED IMPLANTS. |
| Trial Acronym |
|
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
Dr Chandra Sekhar Chadalavada |
| Designation |
Post graduate student |
| Affiliation |
Dept of periodontology, Sibar Institute of Dental Sciences,Takellapadu, Guntur |
| Address |
Room no - 8, Second floor, Department of periodontology, Sibar institute of dental sicences, Takellapadu, Guntur
Guntur ANDHRA PRADESH 522509 India |
| Phone |
9704619339 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
drsekhar93@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Dr Ramanarayana B |
| Designation |
Reader, Dept of periodontology |
| Affiliation |
Sibar Institute of Dental Sciences |
| Address |
Room no - 8, Second floor, Department of periodontology, Sibar institute of dental sicences, Takellapadu, Guntur
Guntur ANDHRA PRADESH 522509 India |
| Phone |
9490144365 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
dr.ramanarayana@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Dr Ramanarayana B |
| Designation |
Reader, Dept of periodontology |
| Affiliation |
Sibar Institute of Dental Sciences |
| Address |
Room no - 8, Second floor, Department of periodontology, Sibar institute of dental sicences, Takellapadu, Guntur
Guntur ANDHRA PRADESH 522509 India |
| Phone |
9490144365 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
dr.ramanarayana@gmail.com |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
| De Tech Co LTD;Ankara, Turkey. |
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
Chandra Sekhar Chadalavada |
| Address |
Room no-8, Second floor, Dept of periodontology, Sibar institute of dental sciences,Guntur,AP- 522509 |
| Type of Sponsor |
Other [self] |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Chandra Sekhar Chadalavada |
Dept of periodontology |
Room no-8, Second floor, Dept of periodontology, Sibar institute of dental sciences,Guntur,AP- 522509 Guntur ANDHRA PRADESH |
9704619339
drsekhar93@gmail.com |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| Institutional Ethics Committe |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Healthy Human Volunteers |
Isolated area of missing teeth |
| Patients |
(1) ICD-10 Condition: K084||Partial loss of teeth, |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Comparator Agent |
Laser microfused implants placement |
evaluate the clinical efficacy of early loaded implants by comparing the stability and hard tissue changes between trabecular implants with enhanced surface and laser microfused implants with enhanced surface roughness for duration of one year six months |
| Intervention |
Trabecular implant placement |
evaluate the clinical efficacy of early loaded implants by comparing the stability and hard tissue changes between trabecular implants with enhanced surface and laser microfused implants with enhanced surface roughness. |
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
20.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
60.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Both |
| Details |
1.Patients compliance to oral hygiene measures.
2.Individuals in need of tooth replacement in mandibular posterior region.
3.Apparently healthy individuals.
4.Individuals with adequate bone volume and quality(D2/D3).
5.Patients who are willing to give informed consent.
|
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
1.Smokers.
2.Individuals with parafunctional habits.
3.Pregnant and lactating women.
4.Presence of any pathology/condition that contraindicates implant placement. |
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Stratified block randomization |
|
Method of Concealment
|
Centralized |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Participant and Outcome Assessor Blinded |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
To Assess and compare implant stability between Trabecular and Laser Microfused implants using Resonance Frequency analysis (RFA) device OSSTELL, (Sweden).
|
Baseline, 3 months and 6 months. |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| To Assess and compare peri implant bone level after implant placement, in trabecular and Laser Microfused implants. |
Baseline, 3 months and 6 months. |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="28" Sample Size from India="28"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
N/A |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
21/09/2021 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="1" Months="6" Days="3" |
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
Modification(s)
|
Not Applicable |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Open to Recruitment |
|
Publication Details
|
NIL |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
Response - YES
- What data in particular will be shared?
Response - Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after de-identification (text, tables, figures, and appendices).
- What additional supporting information will be shared?
Response - Study Protocol Response - Statistical Analysis Plan Response - Informed Consent Form
- Who will be able to view these files?
Response - Anyone
- For what types of analyses will this data be available?
Response - For individual participant data meta-analysis.
- By what mechanism will data be made available?
Response - Proposals should be directed to [drsekhar93@gmail.com].
- For how long will this data be available start date provided 05-08-2021 and end date provided 05-02-2023?
Response - Immediately following publication. No end date.
- Any URL or additional information regarding plan/policy for sharing IPD?
Additional Information - NIL
|
|
Brief Summary
|
Endosseous dental implants have become a predictable method of replacing missing teeth to enhance the patient’s quality of life. Formation of direct bone to implant contact is the main success criteria in implant dentistry. Porous surface should enhance integration following bone grow into the pores. Porous surface coating should enhance integration, by allowing bone growth inside the pores; however, the number and size of the pores that can be obtained on the surface of the implant determine the quality and quantity of the bone growth. Histological studies showed that while a pore size of ̴ 100 µm is adequate for bone ingrowth , osteon formation inside a porous material needs ̴ 150 µm pores , while pores greater than ̴ 300 µm are required to support vascularised bone ingrowth .
The porosity of Trabecular implant not only significantly increases the surface available for bone formation, but also allows angiogenesis and bone formation inside the pores : the average pore size of Trabecular implant is ̴ 550 µm, adequate for blood vessel formation and osseoincorporation . The term osseoincorporation indicates the combination of osseointegration/bone on-growth (bone to implant contact, BIC) and bone ingrowth within the porous material. Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA) is proven to be an accurate method to assess implant stability. In the present study, Osstell, Sweden ISQ, that utilises RFA technology was used to determine implant stability. RFA consists of a transducer connected to an implant, which is excited over a range of frequencies. RFA causes the implant to vibrate while at the same time, analyses the implant motion to provide information as an implant stability quotient (ISQ) on a scale from 1–100. |