FULL DETAILS (Read-only)  -> Click Here to Create PDF for Current Dataset of Trial
CTRI Number  CTRI/2021/11/038334 [Registered on: 30/11/2021] Trial Registered Prospectively
Last Modified On: 29/11/2021
Post Graduate Thesis  Yes 
Type of Trial  Interventional 
Type of Study   Diagnostic 
Study Design  Randomized, Parallel Group Trial 
Public Title of Study   Comparative study between femoral nerve block versus pericapsular nerve group block for pain in proximal femoral fractures during anesthesia positioning  
Scientific Title of Study   COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PERICAPSULAR NERVE GROUP BLOCK VERSUS FEMORAL BLOCK WITH ULTRASOUND GUIDANCE FOR ANALGESIA OF POSITIONAL PAIN IN PROXIMAL FEMORAL FRACTURES  
Trial Acronym   
Secondary IDs if Any  
Secondary ID  Identifier 
NIL  NIL 
 
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)  
Name  Dr AKASH BABU 
Designation  Junior Resident  
Affiliation  Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital  
Address  Sree Balaji Medical College And Hospital No .7 CLC works road Chrompet

Chennai
TAMIL NADU
600044
India 
Phone  9043739347  
Fax    
Email  Akashyadhu@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Scientific Query
 
Name  Vinod 
Designation  Professor  
Affiliation  Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital  
Address  Sree Balaji Medical College And Hospital No .7 CLC works road Chrompet

Chennai
TAMIL NADU
600044
India 
Phone  9841557566  
Fax    
Email  vinodkrishnagopal@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Public Query
 
Name  Dr AKASH BABU 
Designation  Junior Resident  
Affiliation  Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital  
Address  Sree Balaji Medical College And Hospital No .7 CLC works road Chrompet


TAMIL NADU
600044
India 
Phone  9043739347  
Fax    
Email  Akashyadhu@gmail.com  
 
Source of Monetary or Material Support  
Sree Balaji Medical College and hospital  
 
Primary Sponsor  
Name  Sree Balaji Medical College and hospital  
Address  No 7, CLC works road, Chrompet Chennai  
Type of Sponsor  Private medical college 
 
Details of Secondary Sponsor  
Name  Address 
NIL  NIL 
 
Countries of Recruitment     India  
Sites of Study  
No of Sites = 1  
Name of Principal Investigator  Name of Site  Site Address  Phone/Fax/Email 
DrAkash  Sree Balaji medical College and Hospital  Department of anesthesia Sree balaji medical college and hospital, 3 star operation theatre Number 7,CLC Works Road, Chrompet
Chennai
TAMIL NADU 
9043739347

akashyadhu@gmail.com 
 
Details of Ethics Committee  
No of Ethics Committees= 1  
Name of Committee  Approval Status 
Institutional Human Ethical Committee   Approved 
 
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI  
Status 
Not Applicable 
 
Health Condition / Problems Studied  
Health Type  Condition 
Patients  , (1) ICD-10 Condition: O||Medical and Surgical,  
 
Intervention / Comparator Agent  
Type  Name  Details 
Intervention  Pericapsular nerve group block versus femoral block   Under ultrasound guidance with 10 ML of 2% lignocaine place 0.5% bupivacaine will be given 20mis prior to positioning the patient for spinal anaesthesia  
Comparator Agent  Pericapsular nerve group block versus femoral nerve block   Comparison of efficiency of both blocks in pain relief and hemodynamic stability and comfort of the patient while positioning them for spinal anesthesia in proximal femoral fracture patients . 
 
Inclusion Criteria  
Age From  15.00 Year(s)
Age To  80.00 Year(s)
Gender  Both 
Details  All patients undergoing lower limb surgery at Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital
1. ASA grade - l, ll, lll
2. Patients posted for proximal femoral fracture
3. Patients posted for elective surgeries  
 
ExclusionCriteria 
Details  1. Patient refusal
2. ASA grade lV
3. Morbidly obese patient
4. Known case of hypersensitivity reaction to local anaesthetics.
5. Bleeding diathesis, peripheral neuropathy and psychiatric disorder.
6. Local infection at the site of puncture.
7. Patients with polytrauma.
8. Previous femoral bypass surgeries 
 
Method of Generating Random Sequence   Computer generated randomization 
Method of Concealment   On-site computer system 
Blinding/Masking   Investigator Blinded 
Primary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
To find which block patience provides more analgesia, haemodynamic status and ease of the patient while positioning the patient for spinal anaesthesia.  Till positioning of the patient for spinal anesthesia  
 
Secondary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
Comparing the efficacy of two blocks  From the time of performing the block Till positioning of the patient 
 
Target Sample Size   Total Sample Size="50"
Sample Size from India="50" 
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" 
Phase of Trial   N/A 
Date of First Enrollment (India)   01/12/2021 
Date of Study Completion (India) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Date of First Enrollment (Global)  Date Missing 
Date of Study Completion (Global) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Estimated Duration of Trial   Years="1"
Months="6"
Days="0" 
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)   Not Applicable 
Recruitment Status of Trial (India)  Not Yet Recruiting 
Publication Details   Nil 
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement

Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?  

Response - NO
Brief Summary   This is a comparative study, to be done in total number of 50 patients who are undergoing proximal femur fracture surgeries at Department of Anaesthesiology PM &CC,Sree Balaji medical College and Hospital, Chennai.
After confirming to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, patients will be selected consecutively and Assigned alternatively to either of the two groups. The first group shall undergo USG guided pericapsular nerve group block and the second group shall undergo USG  guided femoral nerve block with 10ml of 2% lignocaine plus 0.5% bupivacaine. Both the groups The procedure under USG guidance 20 minutes prior to positioning the patient for spinal anaesthesia. The quality of patients positioning during the spinal anesthesia was graded according to the scale( 1- satisfactory,2- good 3-optimal) and was recorded. Pain status will be assessed by numerical rating pain score before, after and while positioning the patient for spinal anesthesia. The hemodynamic status of the patients will be recorded throughout the whole process.
 
Close