CTRI Number |
CTRI/2021/11/038334 [Registered on: 30/11/2021] Trial Registered Prospectively |
Last Modified On: |
29/11/2021 |
Post Graduate Thesis |
Yes |
Type of Trial |
Interventional |
Type of Study
|
Diagnostic |
Study Design |
Randomized, Parallel Group Trial |
Public Title of Study
|
Comparative study between femoral nerve block versus pericapsular nerve group block for pain in proximal femoral fractures during anesthesia positioning |
Scientific Title of Study
|
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PERICAPSULAR NERVE GROUP BLOCK VERSUS FEMORAL BLOCK WITH ULTRASOUND GUIDANCE FOR ANALGESIA OF POSITIONAL PAIN IN PROXIMAL FEMORAL FRACTURES |
Trial Acronym |
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
Secondary ID |
Identifier |
NIL |
NIL |
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
Name |
Dr AKASH BABU |
Designation |
Junior Resident |
Affiliation |
Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital |
Address |
Sree Balaji Medical College And Hospital No .7 CLC works road
Chrompet
Chennai TAMIL NADU 600044 India |
Phone |
9043739347 |
Fax |
|
Email |
Akashyadhu@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
Name |
Vinod |
Designation |
Professor |
Affiliation |
Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital |
Address |
Sree Balaji Medical College And Hospital No .7 CLC works road
Chrompet
Chennai TAMIL NADU 600044 India |
Phone |
9841557566 |
Fax |
|
Email |
vinodkrishnagopal@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
Name |
Dr AKASH BABU |
Designation |
Junior Resident |
Affiliation |
Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital |
Address |
Sree Balaji Medical College And Hospital No .7 CLC works road
Chrompet
TAMIL NADU 600044 India |
Phone |
9043739347 |
Fax |
|
Email |
Akashyadhu@gmail.com |
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
Sree Balaji Medical College and hospital |
|
Primary Sponsor
|
Name |
Sree Balaji Medical College and hospital |
Address |
No 7, CLC works road, Chrompet Chennai |
Type of Sponsor |
Private medical college |
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
Sites of Study
|
No of Sites = 1 |
Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
DrAkash |
Sree Balaji medical College and Hospital |
Department of anesthesia
Sree balaji medical college and hospital,
3 star operation theatre
Number 7,CLC Works Road, Chrompet Chennai TAMIL NADU |
9043739347
akashyadhu@gmail.com |
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
Institutional Human Ethical Committee |
Approved |
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
Health Type |
Condition |
Patients |
, (1) ICD-10 Condition: O||Medical and Surgical, |
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
Type |
Name |
Details |
Intervention |
Pericapsular nerve group block versus femoral block |
Under ultrasound guidance with 10 ML of 2% lignocaine place 0.5% bupivacaine will be given 20mis prior to positioning the patient for spinal anaesthesia |
Comparator Agent |
Pericapsular nerve group block versus femoral nerve block |
Comparison of efficiency of both blocks in pain relief and hemodynamic stability and comfort of the patient while positioning them for spinal anesthesia in proximal femoral fracture patients . |
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
Age From |
15.00 Year(s) |
Age To |
80.00 Year(s) |
Gender |
Both |
Details |
All patients undergoing lower limb surgery at Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital
1. ASA grade - l, ll, lll
2. Patients posted for proximal femoral fracture
3. Patients posted for elective surgeries |
|
ExclusionCriteria |
Details |
1. Patient refusal
2. ASA grade lV
3. Morbidly obese patient
4. Known case of hypersensitivity reaction to local anaesthetics.
5. Bleeding diathesis, peripheral neuropathy and psychiatric disorder.
6. Local infection at the site of puncture.
7. Patients with polytrauma.
8. Previous femoral bypass surgeries |
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Computer generated randomization |
Method of Concealment
|
On-site computer system |
Blinding/Masking
|
Investigator Blinded |
Primary Outcome
|
Outcome |
TimePoints |
To find which block patience provides more analgesia, haemodynamic status and ease of the patient while positioning the patient for spinal anaesthesia. |
Till positioning of the patient for spinal anesthesia |
|
Secondary Outcome
|
Outcome |
TimePoints |
Comparing the efficacy of two blocks |
From the time of performing the block Till positioning of the patient |
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="50" Sample Size from India="50"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" |
Phase of Trial
|
N/A |
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
01/12/2021 |
Date of Study Completion (India) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="1" Months="6" Days="0" |
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
|
Not Applicable |
Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Not Yet Recruiting |
Publication Details
|
Nil |
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
Response - NO
|
Brief Summary
|
This is a comparative study, to be done in total number of 50 patients who are undergoing proximal femur fracture surgeries at Department of Anaesthesiology PM &CC,Sree Balaji medical College and Hospital, Chennai. After confirming to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, patients will be selected consecutively and Assigned alternatively to either of the two groups. The first group shall undergo USG guided pericapsular nerve group block and the second group shall undergo USG guided femoral nerve block with 10ml of 2% lignocaine plus 0.5% bupivacaine. Both the groups The procedure under USG guidance 20 minutes prior to positioning the patient for spinal anaesthesia. The quality of patients positioning during the spinal anesthesia was graded according to the scale( 1- satisfactory,2- good 3-optimal) and was recorded. Pain status will be assessed by numerical rating pain score before, after and while positioning the patient for spinal anesthesia. The hemodynamic status of the patients will be recorded throughout the whole process. |