Clinical study was carried out after permission from
institutional ethics committee clearance
(GAV/VAD/IEC/60/2020, Dated 20/08/2020) and retrospectively registered at
Clinical Trial Registry of India, ICMR, New Delhi, vide CTRI/2021/04/032979
[Registered on 20 / 04 /2021]. Study type was interventional, open
label randomized clinical trial. It explores with description of the aims and objectives,
materials and methods, criteria of selection of the patients, general observations
and effect of therapy. Also a detailed description about the diagnostic
criteria for psoriasis along with the subjective and objective criteria for the
assessment of results is stated here. Specialized scoring pattern for criteria
for assessment was adopted were assessed in terms of percentage relief and
statistical evaluation. Thereafter the observations and results are presented
in tabular form followed by interpretation. The overall assessment of therapy
was decided on the basis of scoring pattern. In this study, total 35 patients
were selected and randomly divided into two groups, 16 in group A and 19 in
group B respectively. Total 30 patients i.e. 15 in group A and 15 in group B
completed the treatment with JY and JM respectively. Duration of treatment was
4 weeks along with follow up of 1 week. The observations were made on the
parameters like age, sex, occupation, addiction etc. and cardinal symptoms like
Matsyashakalopamam, Krishna Aruna Varna, Mahavastu, Mandala, Aswedanama
etc., scrutinized, analyzed and recorded through a specially prepared proforma.
The effect of all the drugs on signs and symptoms of disease, haematocrit
values were recorded before and after treatment by adopting scoring pattern.
Maximum numbers of
patients (42.86%) were from the age group of 51-60 years, male (65.71%),
married (94.29%) and Hindu (82.86%) by religion. Maximum patients were having Kapha
Vata Prakriti (57.14%), Rajasika Manasa Prakriti, Madhyama
Satva (62.86%), Madhyama Samhanana (100%), Madhyama Pramana
(100%), Madhyama Satmya (94.28%), Madhyama Vyayama Shakti
(65.71%), Madyama Abhyavarana Shakti (97.14%) and Madhyama Koshtha
(80%) were found in maximum patients.
Amla Rasa
(82.86%) Pradhana Ahara sevana was found in maximum of patients as
etiological factor. Ahara dominant in Guru (82.86%) and Sheeta
Guna (54.28%) was dominant majority of enrolled. consumption of Viruddha
Ahara (60%) followed by Pishtanna (57.14%) was found maximum.
Maximum patients developed
the disease less than a year (68.57%) and a negative family history of
psoriasis was found in (91.43%). Maximum patients showed symptoms of Kandu
(100%), Matsyashakalopama (94.28%), Krishna-Aruna Varna (88.57%),
and Nidranasha (54.29%).
Group A shows highly
significant result was found` in Matsyashakalopama, Krishna-Aruna Varna and
Kandu, while significant result
was found in Rukshata. In group B highly significant result was
found in Kandu, while significant result was found in Matsyashakalopama,
Krishna-Aruna Varna, Rukshata, Nidranasha,. Group A was seen to provide
better results on complaints Kandu (86.67%), Matsyashakalopama (73.33%), Rukshata (43.33%) and Krishna-Aruna
Varna (30%) where in group B shows better result on Nidranasha (46.67%).
Insignificant result was found in Aswedanama, Mahavastu, Mandala, Daha and Srava in both groups. In Both group
highly significant result was found in PASI
and DLQI score, while in both group significant result was found in Auspitz
sign.
The variations observed in haematological parameters
before and after treatment were statistically insignificant in both groups.
Data
reveals that group A and group B showed statistically insignificant difference
in appearance of all sign of Ekakushtha except Kandu, group A
shows better result in Kandu than group B. In group A and group B,
73.33% and 20% of the patients showed moderate improvement while mild
improvement were seen in 20% and 60% of patients respectively. There is 6.66%
patients showed marked improvement in group Abut there is no patient showed
marked improvement in group B. Unchanged result was found in 20% patients in
group B. There is none patient was observed for complete remission in group A
and B.
Clinical study was carried out after permission from
institutional ethics committee clearance
(GAV/VAD/IEC/60/2020, Dated 20/08/2020) and retrospectively registered at
Clinical Trial Registry of India, ICMR, New Delhi, vide CTRI/2021/04/032979
[Registered on 20 / 04 /2021]. Study type was interventional, open
label randomized clinical trial. It explores with description of the aims and objectives,
materials and methods, criteria of selection of the patients, general observations
and effect of therapy. Also a detailed description about the diagnostic
criteria for psoriasis along with the subjective and objective criteria for the
assessment of results is stated here. Specialized scoring pattern for criteria
for assessment was adopted were assessed in terms of percentage relief and
statistical evaluation. Thereafter the observations and results are presented
in tabular form followed by interpretation. The overall assessment of therapy
was decided on the basis of scoring pattern. In this study, total 35 patients
were selected and randomly divided into two groups, 16 in group A and 19 in
group B respectively. Total 30 patients i.e. 15 in group A and 15 in group B
completed the treatment with JY and JM respectively. Duration of treatment was
4 weeks along with follow up of 1 week. The observations were made on the
parameters like age, sex, occupation, addiction etc. and cardinal symptoms like
Matsyashakalopamam, Krishna Aruna Varna, Mahavastu, Mandala, Aswedanama
etc., scrutinized, analyzed and recorded through a specially prepared proforma.
The effect of all the drugs on signs and symptoms of disease, haematocrit
values were recorded before and after treatment by adopting scoring pattern.
Maximum numbers of
patients (42.86%) were from the age group of 51-60 years, male (65.71%),
married (94.29%) and Hindu (82.86%) by religion. Maximum patients were having Kapha
Vata Prakriti (57.14%), Rajasika Manasa Prakriti, Madhyama
Satva (62.86%), Madhyama Samhanana (100%), Madhyama Pramana
(100%), Madhyama Satmya (94.28%), Madhyama Vyayama Shakti
(65.71%), Madyama Abhyavarana Shakti (97.14%) and Madhyama Koshtha
(80%) were found in maximum patients.
Amla Rasa
(82.86%) Pradhana Ahara sevana was found in maximum of patients as
etiological factor. Ahara dominant in Guru (82.86%) and Sheeta
Guna (54.28%) was dominant majority of enrolled. consumption of Viruddha
Ahara (60%) followed by Pishtanna (57.14%) was found maximum.
Maximum patients developed
the disease less than a year (68.57%) and a negative family history of
psoriasis was found in (91.43%). Maximum patients showed symptoms of Kandu
(100%), Matsyashakalopama (94.28%), Krishna-Aruna Varna (88.57%),
and Nidranasha (54.29%).
Group A shows highly
significant result was found` in Matsyashakalopama, Krishna-Aruna Varna and
Kandu, while significant result
was found in Rukshata. In group B highly significant result was
found in Kandu, while significant result was found in Matsyashakalopama,
Krishna-Aruna Varna, Rukshata, Nidranasha,. Group A was seen to provide
better results on complaints Kandu (86.67%), Matsyashakalopama (73.33%), Rukshata (43.33%) and Krishna-Aruna
Varna (30%) where in group B shows better result on Nidranasha (46.67%).
Insignificant result was found in Aswedanama, Mahavastu, Mandala, Daha and Srava in both groups. In Both group
highly significant result was found in PASI
and DLQI score, while in both group significant result was found in Auspitz
sign.
The variations observed in haematological parameters
before and after treatment were statistically insignificant in both groups.
Data
reveals that group A and group B showed statistically insignificant difference
in appearance of all sign of Ekakushtha except Kandu, group A
shows better result in Kandu than group B. In group A and group B,
73.33% and 20% of the patients showed moderate improvement while mild
improvement were seen in 20% and 60% of patients respectively. There is 6.66%
patients showed marked improvement in group Abut there is no patient showed
marked improvement in group B. Unchanged result was found in 20% patients in
group B. There is none patient was observed for complete remission in group A
and B.
Clinical study was carried out after permission from
institutional ethics committee clearance
(GAV/VAD/IEC/60/2020, Dated 20/08/2020) and retrospectively registered at
Clinical Trial Registry of India, ICMR, New Delhi, vide CTRI/2021/04/032979
[Registered on 20 / 04 /2021]. Study type was interventional, open
label randomized clinical trial. It explores with description of the aims and objectives,
materials and methods, criteria of selection of the patients, general observations
and effect of therapy. Also a detailed description about the diagnostic
criteria for psoriasis along with the subjective and objective criteria for the
assessment of results is stated here. Specialized scoring pattern for criteria
for assessment was adopted were assessed in terms of percentage relief and
statistical evaluation. Thereafter the observations and results are presented
in tabular form followed by interpretation. The overall assessment of therapy
was decided on the basis of scoring pattern. In this study, total 35 patients
were selected and randomly divided into two groups, 16 in group A and 19 in
group B respectively. Total 30 patients i.e. 15 in group A and 15 in group B
completed the treatment with JY and JM respectively. Duration of treatment was
4 weeks along with follow up of 1 week. The observations were made on the
parameters like age, sex, occupation, addiction etc. and cardinal symptoms like
Matsyashakalopamam, Krishna Aruna Varna, Mahavastu, Mandala, Aswedanama
etc., scrutinized, analyzed and recorded through a specially prepared proforma.
The effect of all the drugs on signs and symptoms of disease, haematocrit
values were recorded before and after treatment by adopting scoring pattern.
Maximum numbers of
patients (42.86%) were from the age group of 51-60 years, male (65.71%),
married (94.29%) and Hindu (82.86%) by religion. Maximum patients were having Kapha
Vata Prakriti (57.14%), Rajasika Manasa Prakriti, Madhyama
Satva (62.86%), Madhyama Samhanana (100%), Madhyama Pramana
(100%), Madhyama Satmya (94.28%), Madhyama Vyayama Shakti
(65.71%), Madyama Abhyavarana Shakti (97.14%) and Madhyama Koshtha
(80%) were found in maximum patients.
Amla Rasa
(82.86%) Pradhana Ahara sevana was found in maximum of patients as
etiological factor. Ahara dominant in Guru (82.86%) and Sheeta
Guna (54.28%) was dominant majority of enrolled. consumption of Viruddha
Ahara (60%) followed by Pishtanna (57.14%) was found maximum.
Maximum patients developed
the disease less than a year (68.57%) and a negative family history of
psoriasis was found in (91.43%). Maximum patients showed symptoms of Kandu
(100%), Matsyashakalopama (94.28%), Krishna-Aruna Varna (88.57%),
and Nidranasha (54.29%).
Group A shows highly
significant result was found` in Matsyashakalopama, Krishna-Aruna Varna and
Kandu, while significant result
was found in Rukshata. In group B highly significant result was
found in Kandu, while significant result was found in Matsyashakalopama,
Krishna-Aruna Varna, Rukshata, Nidranasha,. Group A was seen to provide
better results on complaints Kandu (86.67%), Matsyashakalopama (73.33%), Rukshata (43.33%) and Krishna-Aruna
Varna (30%) where in group B shows better result on Nidranasha (46.67%).
Insignificant result was found in Aswedanama, Mahavastu, Mandala, Daha and Srava in both groups. In Both group
highly significant result was found in PASI
and DLQI score, while in both group significant result was found in Auspitz
sign.
The variations observed in haematological parameters
before and after treatment were statistically insignificant in both groups.
Data
reveals that group A and group B showed statistically insignificant difference
in appearance of all sign of Ekakushtha except Kandu, group A
shows better result in Kandu than group B. In group A and group B,
73.33% and 20% of the patients showed moderate improvement while mild
improvement were seen in 20% and 60% of patients respectively. There is 6.66%
patients showed marked improvement in group Abut there is no patient showed
marked improvement in group B. Unchanged result was found in 20% patients in
group B. There is none patient was observed for complete remission in group A
and B.