| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2021/02/031023 [Registered on: 04/02/2021] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
04/02/2021 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
Yes |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Surgical/Anesthesia |
| Study Design |
Randomized, Parallel Group, Active Controlled Trial |
|
Public Title of Study
|
To compare two laparoscopic surgeries for uterine or vault prolapse correction |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
Comparison of Laparoscopic Pectopexy with the standard Laparoscopic Sacropexy for Apical Prolapse: An exploratory randomized controlled trial. |
| Trial Acronym |
Laparoscopic pectopexy |
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
Dr Kavita Khoiwal |
| Designation |
Assistant Professor |
| Affiliation |
AIIMS RISHIKESH |
| Address |
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology AIIMS Rishikesh Uttarakhand
Dehradun UTTARANCHAL 249203 India |
| Phone |
9690396908 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
kavita.kh27@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Dr Kavita Khoiwal |
| Designation |
Assistant Professor |
| Affiliation |
AIIMS RISHIKESH |
| Address |
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology AIIMS Rishikesh Uttarakhand
Dehradun UTTARANCHAL 249203 India |
| Phone |
9690396908 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
kavita.kh27@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Dr Kanhu Charan Dash |
| Designation |
Junior Resident |
| Affiliation |
AIIMS RISHIKESH |
| Address |
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology AIIMS Rishikesh Uttarakhand
Dehradun UTTARANCHAL 249203 India |
| Phone |
9439653374 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
kanhu101251@gmail.com |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
| All India Institute Of Medical Sciences Rishikesh |
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
All India Institute Of Medical Sciences Rishikesh |
| Address |
Virbhadra marg, Rishikesh,Uttarakhand,India |
| Type of Sponsor |
Research institution and hospital |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Dr Kavita Khoiwal |
All India Institute Of Medical Sciences Rishikesh |
Room Number-016103, Level 6,Department Of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academic Block Dehradun UTTARANCHAL |
9690396908
kavita.kh27@gmail.com |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| AIIMS RISHIKESH |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Patients |
(1) ICD-10 Condition: N813||Complete uterovaginal prolapse, |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Intervention |
laparoscopic pectopexy |
compare laparoscopic pectopexy with the standard laparoscopic sacropexy in women with symptomatic apical prolapse (POP-Q stage II). |
| Comparator Agent |
laparoscopic sacropexy |
compare laparoscopic pectopexy with the standard laparoscopic sacropexy in women with symptomatic apical prolapse (POP-Q stage II) |
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
18.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
75.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Female |
| Details |
1. Women with symptomatic apical prolapse (uterovaginal prolapse or vaginal vault prolapse) of stage 2 or greater according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system.
2. Women who agree to participate in the trial and to comply with the protocol and give their written consent for the same.
3. Patients who are able to communicate by telephone and answer questions.
4. Adequate cardio respiratory, renal and liver functions and who will be fit to undergo surgery.
|
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
Prior surgeries for vaginal prolapse correction
2. Active pelvic inflammatory disease
3. Current pregnancy
4. Any contraindications against one of the surgical methods applied in the study, hence making the randomization impossible (e.g. previously identified or strongly suspected massive adhesions between sigmoid colon and presacral peritoneum.
5. History of premalignant or malignant diseases of uterus, cervix or adnexa
6. Any contraindication for laparoscopic surgery
7. Patient unfit for anaesthesia
8. Patient not willing to comply with the protocol
|
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Computer generated randomization |
|
Method of Concealment
|
On-site computer system |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Open Label |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| Average placement of mesh time |
1 year 6 month |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
operation time, blood loss, occurrence of major complications.
Hemoglobin decline, Pain (VAS score), duration of hospital stay, onset of bowel movements, episodes of constipation, urinary retention or urgency, de novo urinary incontinence (urge or stress urinary incontinence), urinary tract infections, occurrence of de novo anterior and lateral defect, de novo cystocele, de novo rectocele, dyspareunia, mesh erosion, relapse of apical prolapse and satisfaction rate.
|
1 year 6 month |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="56" Sample Size from India="56"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
N/A |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
05/02/2021 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="1" Months="6" Days="0" |
|
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
|
Not Applicable |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Not Yet Recruiting |
|
Publication Details
|
will publish once trial completed |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
Response - NO
|
|
Brief Summary
|
Sacrocolpopexy is
considered to be the gold standard surgical treatment of vaginal vault
prolapse. Abdominal and laparoscopic approaches to sacrocolpopexy are feasible,
but the laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy obviates the need of large abdominal
incision, and associated with minimal tissue handling, less blood loss, less
postoperative morbidity, less pain, shorter hospital stay. Laparoscopic
sacrocolpopexy is preferred than open sacrocolpopexy for apical vaginal defect
in hands of expertise.
The laparoscopic
pectopexy is a newer alternative of sacropexy. It was first described in 2010
by Noe KG et al , especially for obese women. In laparoscopic pectopexy,
mesh is fixed at bilateral ilio-pectineal ligament and the apex of vaginal
vault or anterior cervical wall. The mess follows the natural anatomical
structure (round and broad ligament) to maintain the physiological axis without
crossing ureter or bowel; therefore, pelvic outlet does not shrink and it fixes
the weakness using lateral parts of the ilio-pectineal ligaments on both sides.
In addition, the hypogastric vessels are also a safe distance from any danger.The aim of the present study is to compare laparoscopic
pectopexy with the standard laparoscopic sacropexy in women with symptomatic
apical prolapse (POP-Q >stage II).
|