FULL DETAILS (Read-only)  -> Click Here to Create PDF for Current Dataset of Trial
CTRI Number  CTRI/2021/01/030720 [Registered on: 22/01/2021] Trial Registered Prospectively
Last Modified On: 28/01/2021
Post Graduate Thesis  Yes 
Type of Trial  Interventional 
Type of Study   Dentistry 
Study Design  Randomized, Parallel Group Trial 
Public Title of Study   Comparison of silk suture and cyanoacrylate adhesive after mandibular third molar surgical removal 
Scientific Title of Study   Cyanoacrylate Tissue Adhesive Or Silk Suture For Closure Of Wound Following Surgical Removal Of An Impacted Mandibular Third Molar: A Randomised Comparetive Study 
Trial Acronym   
Secondary IDs if Any  
Secondary ID  Identifier 
No.01/RR/AP/98/F/R  DCGI 
 
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)  
Name  Nusrin Thoniyotupuratil 
Designation  PG student 
Affiliation  Yenepoya Dental College 
Address  Department Of Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery.Room NO.4 Yenepoya Dental College Manglore
Department Of Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery.Room NO.4 Yenepoya Dental College Manglore
Dakshina Kannada
KARNATAKA
505718
India 
Phone  9605521883  
Fax    
Email  drnusrintp@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Scientific Query
 
Name  Dr Arvind Rao HT 
Designation  Associate Professor 
Affiliation  Yenepoya Dental College 
Address  Department Of Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery. Room No 4 Yenepoya Dental College Yenepoya Deemed to be University Manglore
Department Of Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery. Room No 4 Yenepoya Dental College Yenepoya Deemed to be University Manglore
Dakshina Kannada
KARNATAKA
505718
India 
Phone  9448142508  
Fax    
Email  arvind_raoht@rediffmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Public Query
 
Name  Nusrin Thoniyotupurayil 
Designation  PG student 
Affiliation  Yenepoya Dental College 
Address  Department Of Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery.Room NO.4 Yenepoya Dental Collage Manglore
Department Of Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery.Room NO.4 Yenepoya Dental Collage Manglor
Dakshina Kannada
KARNATAKA
505718
India 
Phone  9605521883  
Fax    
Email  drnusrintp@gmail.com  
 
Source of Monetary or Material Support  
Department Of Oral And Mxillofacial Surgery Room No .4 Yenepoya dental college Yenepoya deemed to be university manglore 
 
Primary Sponsor  
Name  Nusrin Thoniyotupurayil 
Address  Department of Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery. Roomn NO.4 Yenepoya Deemen to Be University Manglore 
Type of Sponsor  Other [Self funded] 
 
Details of Secondary Sponsor  
Name  Address 
NIL  NIL 
 
Countries of Recruitment     India  
Sites of Study  
No of Sites = 2  
Name of Principal Investigator  Name of Site  Site Address  Phone/Fax/Email 
ARVIND RAOH T  Department of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery  ROOM NO.4 Yenepoya Dental College Yenepoya Deemed To Be University
Dakshina Kannada
KARNATAKA 
9448142508
8242204667
arvind_raoht@rediffmail.com 
ARVIND RAOH T  Yenepoya Dental College  DEPARTMENT OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY. ROOM.NO.4 YENEPOYA DEEMED TO BE UNIVERSITY. DARALAKKATE MANGLORE.
Dakshina Kannada
KARNATAKA 
9448142508

arvind_raoht@rediffmail.com 
 
Details of Ethics Committee  
No of Ethics Committees= 2  
Name of Committee  Approval Status 
Yenepoya University Ethics Committee 2  Submittted/Under Review 
Yenepoya University Ethics Committee 2  Approved 
 
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
Modification(s)  
Status 
Not Applicable 
 
Health Condition / Problems Studied  
Health Type  Condition 
Healthy Human Volunteers  Impacted mandibular third molar 
 
Intervention / Comparator Agent  
Type  Name  Details 
Intervention  Marvilyte tissue adhesive  It is a sterile non toxic biocompatible haemostatic and bacteriostatic agent.It is monemer,when it comes in contact with moisture it gets coverted in to polymer. 
Comparator Agent  Silk suture material  Natural non absorbable suture widely used for wound ligation. 
 
Inclusion Criteria  
Age From  18.00 Year(s)
Age To  50.00 Year(s)
Gender  Both 
Details  1. Patients who are having mesioangular or horizontally impacted mandibular third molar (ClassII
Position B, PELL & GREGORY classification).
2. Patient in the age group of 18-35 years
3. Not allergic to the drugs or anesthetic agent used in the surgical protocol.
4. ASA Grade1 Normal healthy patients.
 
 
ExclusionCriteria 
Details  1. Pregnant or lactating patients.
2. Patients with signs of pericoronitis or active infection.
3. Patients with deleterious habits such as smoking, alcoholic.
4. Patients with poor oral hygiene
 
 
Method of Generating Random Sequence   Permuted block randomization, fixed 
Method of Concealment   Alternation 
Blinding/Masking   Open Label 
Primary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
Haemostatis  first ,third and seventh post operative days 
 
Secondary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
Post operative pain and wound healing  first ,third and seventh post operative days 
 
Target Sample Size   Total Sample Size="14"
Sample Size from India="14" 
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" 
Phase of Trial   Phase 2 
Date of First Enrollment (India)   31/01/2021 
Date of Study Completion (India) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Date of First Enrollment (Global)  Date Missing 
Date of Study Completion (Global) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Estimated Duration of Trial   Years="0"
Months="0"
Days="7" 
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)   Not Applicable 
Recruitment Status of Trial (India)  Not Yet Recruiting 
Publication Details   data will be used for scientific presentation and publication  
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement

Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?  

Response - NO
Brief Summary  

) AIM AND OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

AIM

To compare and evaluate the efficacy of cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive over silk suture for the closure of wound after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars.

 

 

OBJECTIVES

          To evaluate the closure time, pain, bleeding, and wound healingfollowing placement of 3-0 silk suture for the closure of surgical wound after impacted third molar impaction.

        To evaluate the closure time, pain, bleeding, and wound healing following placement of cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive for the closure of surgical wound after third molar impaction.

       To compare the closure time,pain,bleeding,and woundhealing between 3-0 silk suture and cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive.

 

 

5) STUDY DESIGN

 

 Prospective interventional study

 

6) MATERIALS AND METHODS

6.1) MATERIALS

          Disposable gloves

          Local anesthesia

         Mouth mask

         Mouth mirror

         Tweezers

       Cotton and gauze

         Kidney tray

       B P blade

         Dials Periosteal elevator

          Kay Austin retractor

         Cupland elevator

      Apex elevator

          Bone cutting burs

         Micromotor

         Suction tip

          Mandibular third molar forceps

          3-0 silk suture

          Needle holder

          Scissors

         Cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive

 

6.2) METHODOLOGY

          The patients coming to the OPD of the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Yenepoya Dental College, who are diagnosed with mesioangularimpacted submergedmandibular third molar, classified as class II position B, according to Pell and Gregory’s classification, and indicated for surgical removal will be included in this study.

         A detailed case history will be taken with clinical examination.

        Pretreatment OPGwill be obtained.

        The inferior alveolar, long buccal, and lingual nerves will be anesthetized with 2% lidocaine hydrochloride with epinephrine 1:80000 using conventional block technique.

       The buccal approach with Ward’s incision flap is used. The flap will bereflected and osteotomy will be performed by buccal guttering technique with a number 702 or 703straight fissure bur under

copious irrigation with sterile 0.9% normal saline solution.

         The tooth will be sectioned (if required) with astraight fissure bur, then all parts of the tooth will be removed. Once the extraction is completed, the socket will be curetted and sharp bony edges will be rounded up with bone file along with copious irrigation consisting of about 50ml of 0.9% normal saline.

 

 

v  CLOSURE METHOD

 

Group A: After achieving hemostasis, the flap will be repositioned and closed with a 3-0 silk suture

using an interrupted suturing technique. Three sutures will be placed; one at the mesial relieving incision, the second-placed distal to the second molar, and the third-placed distal to the extraction socket to achieve healing by primary intention.

 

Group B: After achieving hemostasis, the flap will be repositioned and closed by usingcyanoacrylate glue [Mervilyte(Iso Amyl 2-Cyanoacrylate), dispensed in ampules of 0.25ml]. The wound edges will be adapted together with a tissue holding forceps, then 1st layer of cyanoacrylate glue will be applied by dropping the

liquid from a syringe and needle (provided by the manufacturer) along the whole incision lines

(distal incision, mesial relieving incision, and flap over the socket), followed by another layer after 20 seconds. The closure will be done to achieve healing by primary intention. To prevent inadvertent oral exposure to cyanoacrylate, the flap will be isolated from the adjacent oral mucosa with sterile gauze roll.

 

 After the extraction, subjects will be informed to eat a soft diet and avoid using the operated side for mastication within the first 24 hours. Normal oral hygiene including warm saline mouth rinse and tooth brushing to be started a day after surgery. All subjects will be given similar preoperative medications of IV Dexamethasone 4mg stat and postoperative medications, which are commenced immediately after the procedure, Cap. Amoxicillin 500 mg 8hrly for 5 days, Tab. metronidazole 400mg 8hrly for 3 days and Tab. Diclofenac Sodium 50 mg 8hrly for 3 days.

 

The patients will be followed up on 1st, 3rd, and7thpost-operative days to evaluate the efficacy of the procedure.

 

After tooth removal patients are instructed to

·         Do not rinse your mouth for 4 hours.

·         Do not remove the cotton / gauze placed over the wound foe at least one hour. Bite down firmly on the cotton for half an hour.

·         Do not place your tongue or finger over the wound area.

·         Eat only soft food for the rest of the day.

·         Do not take hot drinks, avoid alcohol and smoking for the rest of the day.

·         Do not chew on the affected side for at least 2 days.

·          Use prescribed medicines regularly.

·         If the tooth socket continues to bleed even after 2 hours place a piece of gauze or cotton over the socket and close the mouth firmly for 15-30 minutes. If still continues seek dental or medical advice

 

 

CLINICAL ASSESSMENT:

The following parameters are taken into consideration for the assessment of the procedure:

 

      Closure Time: will be evaluated by recording the time via stopwatch from the start of the placement till the completion of the procedure.

                      In group A, the closure time is regarded as the time between the placement of the first

suture and the final suture.

In group B, the closure time is regarded as the time between the placement of the first 

drop of Mervilyte and the final drop.

 

      Post-operative pain: will be evaluated by a 10 level Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) with the patient placing a mark on the scale to indicate an intensity range from no pain ‘0’ to severe/unbearable pain ‘10’. This will be recorded in patients with silk suture and cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive on the1st, 3rd, and 7th postoperative day.

 

 

 

 

Bleeding:Will be evaluated by 4 level Visual Analog Scale (VAS). This will be recorded in patients with silk suture and cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive on the 1st and 3rd, postoperative day.

 

 

GRADE

TYPE OF BLEEDING

DESCRIPTION

0

No bleeding

The patient does not detect any blood in

Saliva

1

Oozing

The patient detects slight blood but it

is not very noticeable

2

Accidental bleeding

The patient has low bleeding sometimes

3

Continuous  bleeding

The patient has low bleeding often

4

Massive Bleeding

Continues high bleeding

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

      Wound healing; Will be evaluated by 3 score10. This will be recorded in patients with silk suture and cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive on the 1st, 3rd,and 7th postoperative day.

 

 

 

 

SCORE

DESCRIPTION

           1

Uneventful wound healing with no gingival edema, erythema, suppuration, patient discomfort, or flap dehiscence.

           2

Uneventful wound healing with slight gingival edema, erythema, patient discomfort or flap dehiscence, but no suppuration

           3

Poor wound healing with significant gingival edema, erythema, patient discomfort, flap dehiscence or any suppuration

 

 

 

6.3)STUDY SETTING

 

The proposed study will be a comparative study with the following procedural steps

Obtaining approval for the study protocol from the institutional ethics committee, Yenepoya University, and obtaining official permission to conduct the study from the institutional ethics committee, Yenepoya University, Hospital Authority.

 

 

 

 

6.4) SOURCE OF DATA

The study will be conducted on patients visiting in the DEPARTMENT OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, YENEPOYA DENTALCOLLEGE,Mangalore, Karnataka.

 

SAMPLING TECHNIQUE

 

Simple random sampling

 

 

6.5)SAMPLE SIZE

         5% level of significance and 80% power and effect size of 0.5, the sample size will be 7in each group.

                            Group A: Closure with 3-0 silk suture for sample size 7

                            Group B: Closure with cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive for sample size 7

 

 

SAMPLE SIZE CALCULATION

The sample size is calculated by using G* POWER software, mean in group A (silk suture) is 4.05 and the standard deviation is 0.43, and the other group, group B mean is 3.42 and the standard deviation is 0.39 (from the related article) and level of significance is 5% with 80% power the total sample size in each group is 7.

6.6) INCLUSION CRITERIA

1. Patients who are having mesioangular or horizontally impacted mandibular third molar (ClassII

Position B, PELL & GREGORY classification).

2. Patient in the age group of 18-35 years

3. Not allergic to the drugs or anesthetic agent used in the surgical protocol.

4. ASA Grade1 Normal healthy patients.

 

 

 

6.7) EXCLUSION CRITERIA

 

 1. Pregnant or lactating patients.

 2. Patients with signs of pericoronitis or active infection.

3. Patients with deleterious habits such as smoking, alcoholic.

 4. Patients with poor oral hygiene

 

6.8) STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

I. Descriptive statistics

                     II. ANOVA / Kruskal-Wallis test

 
Close