| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2012/09/002966 [Registered on: 06/09/2012] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
05/09/2012 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
Yes |
| Type of Trial |
Observational |
|
Type of Study
|
Retrospective Observational Study |
| Study Design |
Other |
|
Public Title of Study
|
Management and prognosis of breast cancer through FDG PET/CT |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
To assess the Indications of 18[F] FDG PET/CT in Breast cancer patients-study based on the patients referred to “The Nuclear Medicine Department†of Max Super Speciality Hospital 2, Press Enclave Road, Saket, New Delhi -110017 |
| Trial Acronym |
|
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| MAX/RETRO/CABR/V-1.2 |
Protocol Number |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
priya gupta |
| Designation |
student |
| Affiliation |
DIPSAR |
| Address |
DELHI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND RESEARCH (DIPSAR), PUSHP VIHAR, NEW DELHI
New Delhi DELHI 110017 India |
| Phone |
|
| Fax |
|
| Email |
priya_charu@hotmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
DrBPSrinivasan |
| Designation |
Director (DIPSAR) |
| Affiliation |
DIPSAR |
| Address |
DIPSAR, PUSHP VIHAR, NEW DELHI
South DELHI 110017 India |
| Phone |
|
| Fax |
|
| Email |
bpsrinivasan@yahoo.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
priya gupta |
| Designation |
student |
| Affiliation |
DIPSAR |
| Address |
DIPSAR, PUSHP VIHAR, NEW DELHI
DELHI 110017 India |
| Phone |
|
| Fax |
|
| Email |
priya_charu@hotmail.com |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
Not applicable Thesis Protocol |
| Address |
Not applicable( Thesis Protocol ) |
| Type of Sponsor |
Other [Not applicable( Thesis Protocol )] |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| DrPankaj Dougall |
Max Super Speciality Hospital, Saket |
Nuclear Medicine Department of Max Super Speciality Hospital 2, Press Enclave Road, Saket, New Delhi -110017 New Delhi DELHI |
9810042316
pdougall@maxhealthcare.com |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| Institutional Ethics Committee |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Patients |
Breast Cancer (Retrospective data of Breast Cancer Patients will be collected), |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
0.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
0.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Female |
| Details |
Female breast cancer patients referred for 18[F] FDGPET/CT scan in the Nuclear Medicine Department of Max Super Speciality Hospital. |
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
Patient clinical data not available. |
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
|
|
Method of Concealment
|
|
|
Blinding/Masking
|
|
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
To determine the indication for 18[F] FDG PET/CT for breast cancer patients, used by Oncologist in Max Super Speciality Hospital:
a)Diagnosis
b)Staging
c)Recurrence/Metastasis (Restaging)
d)Treatment response evaluation
e)Radiation treatment response
|
Indication of 18[F] FDG PET/CT for breast cancer patients:
a)Diagnosis
b)Staging
c)Recurrence/Metastasis (Restaging)
d)Treatment response evaluation
e)Radiation treatment response
|
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
1.To determine 18[F] FDG PET/CT effectiveness in the evaluation of chemotherapy response by calculating the percentage decrease in SUV value from the baseline value (Pre-therapy scan).
2. To determine the impact of 18[F] FDG PET/CT on the treatment management plan, whether altered or supported.
3. To determine the most common metastatic site in the metastatic breast cancer patients.
|
1.Percentage decrease in SUV value (post-therapy scan) from the baseline value (Pre-therapy scan).
2.Change in the treatment management plan.
3. Most common metastatic site in the metastatic breast cancer patients.
|
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="500" Sample Size from India="500"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
N/A |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
01/10/2012 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="0" Months="2" Days="0" |
|
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
|
Not Applicable |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Not Yet Recruiting |
|
Publication Details
|
Publication of the results of the study shall be within the sole discretion of chief guide, in the publication subject identify will not be revealed. Confidentiality of the subject would be maintained. |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
|
|
Brief Summary
|
STUDY RATIONALE:
The management and prognosis of breast cancer depends on a variety of factors, including tumour size, local spread and distant metastasis. The detection of axillary lymph nodes and distant metastases is extremely important in deciding how to treat breast cancer patients. Also the functional imaging plays an important role in evaluating the response to therapy. 18[F] FDG PET/CT may provide an early indication of biologic changes in response to targeted therapy that may indicate that the chosen drug has successfully hit the target and perhaps more important, indicate when the targeted therapy has not impacted the cancer.
STUDY OBJECTIVE:
Primary objective:
Secondary objective:
-
To evaluate chemotherapeutic response in patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer receiving only chemotherapy for metastatic lesion.
-
To evaluate the impact of 18[F] FDG PET/CT on the treatment management plan.
STUDY DESIGN:
This is a Retrospective observational Study to be done on breast cancer patients referred for 18[F] FDG PET/CT scans in “The Nuclear Medicine Department†of Max Super Speciality Hospital from November 2009 to March 2012.
18[F] FDG PET/CT scan reports and medical records of female breast cancer patients will be retrospectively reviewed for the study.
SUBJECT SELECTION: Study specific subject selection criteria are:
-
Inclusion criteria: Female breast cancer patients referred for 18[F] FDG PET/CT scan In “The Nuclear Medicine Department†of Max Super Speciality Hospital.
-
Exclusion criteria: Patient clinical data not available.
SAMPLE SIZE: 500 18[F] FDG PET/CT scans of breast cancer patients will be taken.
STUDY PROCEDURE:
From 2,500 18[F] FDG PET/CT scans, reported in “The Nuclear Medicine Department†of Max Super Speciality Hospital, Saket, 18[F] FDG PET/CT scans referred for breast cancer patients will be separated out and their indications for 18[F] FDG PET/CT and their medical records will be studied and following details will be recorded in the data collection sheet (Appendix-I).
Scan reports and Medical records provide the following data:
1) Age at the time of scan
2) Sex
3) Menopausal status
4) Scan date
5) Indications for FDG PET/CT scan
6) Histobiopsy report
7) Tumour type, size and nodal status
8) Detection of Metastatic sites
9) Number of lesions in each site
10) Standard uptake value (SUVMAX)
11) Impression of FDG PET/CT scans both baseline and post therapy scans
12) Treatment plan after last PET (Altered / Supported)
STUDY DURATION:
Data of female breast cancer patients, who were treated according to the clinical protocol in “The Nuclear Medicine Department†of Max Super Speciality Hospital, Saket from November 2009 to March 2012, will be collected.
Stage 1…Review of medical records
Stage 2…Data collection and Data analysis (1-2 months)
Stage 3…Presentation and publication
STUDY ENDPOINTS(Outcome):
Primary outcome:
a) Diagnosis
b) Staging
c) Recurrence/Metastasis (Restaging)
d) Treatment response evaluation
e) Radiation treatment response
Secondary outcome:
-
To determine 18[F] FDG PET/CT effectiveness in the evaluation of chemotherapy response by calculating the percentage decrease in SUV value from the baseline value (Pre-therapy scan).
-
To determine the impact of 18[F] FDG PET/CT on the treatment management plan, whether altered or supported.
-
To determine the most common metastatic site in the metastatic breast cancer patients
DATA COLLECTION
Hard copy of CRF
|