CTRI Number |
CTRI/2012/08/002898 [Registered on: 22/08/2012] Trial Registered Retrospectively |
Last Modified On: |
25/07/2012 |
Post Graduate Thesis |
Yes |
Type of Trial |
Interventional |
Type of Study
|
Drug |
Study Design |
Randomized, Crossover Trial |
Public Title of Study
|
ICU patient response to tracheal suctioning with placebo, lignocaine or dexmedetomidine |
Scientific Title of Study
|
Effect of intravenous lidocaine and dexmedetomidine on response to tracheal suctioning in intensive care unit patients - A prospective, randomised, double blinded, cross over study |
Trial Acronym |
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
Secondary ID |
Identifier |
IEC 208/211 |
Other |
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
Name |
Umesh Goneppanavar |
Designation |
Associate Professor |
Affiliation |
KMC, Manipal, Manipal University, India |
Address |
Department of Anaesthesia, KMC, Manipal, India
Udupi KARNATAKA 576 104 India |
Phone |
9480575663 |
Fax |
|
Email |
drumeshg@yahoo.co.in |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
Name |
Swaroopa G |
Designation |
Postgraduate student |
Affiliation |
KMC, Manipal, Manipal University, India |
Address |
Department of Anaesthesia, KMC, Manipal, India
Udupi KARNATAKA 576 104 India |
Phone |
9886947695 |
Fax |
|
Email |
dr.swaroopa@rediffmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
Name |
Umesh Goneppanavar |
Designation |
Associate Professor |
Affiliation |
KMC, Manipal, Manipal University, India |
Address |
Department of Anaesthesia, KMC, Manipal, India
KARNATAKA 576 104 India |
Phone |
9480575663 |
Fax |
|
Email |
drumeshg@yahoo.co.in |
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
Kasturba Hospital, KMC, Manipal |
|
Primary Sponsor
|
Name |
Kasturba Hospital KMC Manipal |
Address |
Kasturba Hospital, KMC, Manipal |
Type of Sponsor |
Research institution and hospital |
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
Sites of Study
|
No of Sites = 1 |
Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
Umesh G |
KMC, Manipal |
Department of Anaesthesia, Kasturba Hospital, KMC, Manipal, Udupi district Udupi KARNATAKA |
9480575663
drumeshg@yahoo.co.in |
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
IEC, Kasturba Hospital, Manipal |
Approved |
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
Health Type |
Condition |
Patients |
ICU patients, |
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
Type |
Name |
Details |
Intervention |
dexmedetomidine |
0.3 mcg/kg over 5 min IV 5 minutes prior to tracheal suctioning |
Intervention |
dexmedetomidine |
0.3 mcg/kg over 5 min IV 5 minutes prior to tracheal suctioning |
Intervention |
lignocaine |
1 mg/kg 1 minute prior to tracheal suctioning |
Comparator Agent |
placebo |
saline |
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
Age From |
18.00 Year(s) |
Age To |
85.00 Year(s) |
Gender |
Both |
Details |
All patients that have a tracheal tube in situ in ICU |
|
ExclusionCriteria |
Details |
1. Patients with known or suspected allergy to any of the study drugs (dexmedetomidine, lidocaine)
2. Patients with seizure disorder
3. Patients receiving neuromuscular blockade / with known neuromuscular disease
4. Patients who were hypotensive requiring more than one inotrope / vasopressor
5. Patients that were delirious or had disease condition that would confuse the behaviour assessment, such as decerebrate posturing
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Computer generated randomization |
Method of Concealment
|
Sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes |
Blinding/Masking
|
Participant, Investigator and Outcome Assessor Blinded |
Primary Outcome
|
Outcome |
TimePoints |
Numerical rating scale score
Behavioural response score
Haemodynamic fluctuations of 20% from baseline |
Baseline, at one minute interval for five minutes starting from the point of tracheal suctioning and at 10th and 15th minute following tracheal suctioning.
Behavioural response and numerical rating was assessed just prior to tracheal suctioning and in the following minute after tracheal suctioning |
|
Secondary Outcome
|
Outcome |
TimePoints |
Complications
Arrhythmias, desaturation
|
During study period, that is within 15 minutes after tracheal suctioning |
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="40" Sample Size from India="40"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" |
Phase of Trial
|
Phase 4 |
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
21/09/2011 |
Date of Study Completion (India) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="1" Months="8" Days="0" |
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
|
Not Applicable |
Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Open to Recruitment |
Publication Details
|
NIL |
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
|
Brief Summary
|
In
our study, we evaluated the effects of two different pharmacological
interventions (dexmedetomidine or lidocaine) on tracheal suctioning response.
Randomisation
was done as per a computer generated randomisation table. The blinding was
ensured in the following way:
Syringe A
contained either dexmedetomidine or saline (10 mL) which was administered over
5 minutes as an infusion starting from time 0 till 5th minute.
Syringe B
contained either lidocaine or saline (5 mL) which was administered as a bolus
injection at 4th minute. At the end of 4th
minute, patients received 100% oxygen for further 60 seconds. At the end of
this, tracheal suctioning was carried out over 15 seconds with all aseptic
precautions. The tracheal suction catheter size was determined by the following
formula [Suction catheter size in French = (internal diameter of endotracheal
tube in mm × 3) ÷ 2] and this was kept constant throughout the study for a
given patient. Richmond
Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) was noted at the beginning of the study.
Response to tracheal suctioning was assessed both objectively and subjectively.
Observer 3 rated the pain / discomfort on a scale of 0-10 (numerical rating
scale) both prior to and after suctioning. Variables such as heart rate (HR),
systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial
pressure (MAP) or any change in the rhythm pattern including ectopics etc were noted. These variables were
noted at every minute starting just prior to suctioning and till 5 minutes
after suctioning and then they were noted at 10th and 15th
minute. |