FULL DETAILS (Read-only)  -> Click Here to Create PDF for Current Dataset of Trial
CTRI Number  CTRI/2020/06/025816 [Registered on: 11/06/2020] Trial Registered Prospectively
Last Modified On: 30/12/2021
Post Graduate Thesis  No 
Type of Trial  Interventional 
Type of Study   Surgical/Anesthesia 
Study Design  Randomized, Parallel Group, Active Controlled Trial 
Public Title of Study   Comparison of Epidural anaesthesia with General anaesthesia for breast surgeries 
Scientific Title of Study   Comparison of thoracic epidural anaesthesia with general balanced anaesthesia for perioperative management of modified radical mastectomy - a randomized control trial 
Trial Acronym   
Secondary IDs if Any  
Secondary ID  Identifier 
NIL  NIL 
 
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)  
Name  Nitu PV 
Designation  Associate Professor 
Affiliation  Amrita Institute of medical Sciences 
Address  Dept of Anaesthesia, Amrita Institute of medical Sciences

Ernakulam
KERALA
682041
India 
Phone  09495962020  
Fax  2802020  
Email  nituveesundeep@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Scientific Query
 
Name  Nitu PV 
Designation  Associate Professor 
Affiliation  Amrita Institute of medical Sciences 
Address  Dept of Anaesthesia, Amrita Institute of medical Sciences


KERALA
682041
India 
Phone  09495962020  
Fax  2802020  
Email  nituveesundeep@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Public Query
 
Name  Nitu PV 
Designation  Associate Professor 
Affiliation  Amrita Institute of medical Sciences 
Address  Dept of Anaesthesia, Amrita Institute of medical Sciences


KERALA
682041
India 
Phone  09495962020  
Fax  2802020  
Email  nituveesundeep@gmail.com  
 
Source of Monetary or Material Support  
Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences AIMS Ponekkara, Kochi-682041 
 
Primary Sponsor  
Name  Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences 
Address  AIMS Ponekkara, Kochi-682041 
Type of Sponsor  Private medical college 
 
Details of Secondary Sponsor  
Name  Address 
NIL  NIL 
 
Countries of Recruitment     India  
Sites of Study  
No of Sites = 1  
Name of Principal Investigator  Name of Site  Site Address  Phone/Fax/Email 
Dr Nitu  Amrita Institute of medical Sciences  Department of Anaesthesia Breast clinic OT
Ernakulam
KERALA 
09495962020
2802020
nituveesundeep@gmail.com 
 
Details of Ethics Committee  
No of Ethics Committees= 1  
Name of Committee  Approval Status 
Institutional Ethics Committee  Approved 
 
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI  
Status 
Not Applicable 
 
Health Condition / Problems Studied  
Health Type  Condition 
Patients  (1) ICD-10 Condition: C00-D49||Neoplasms,  
 
Intervention / Comparator Agent  
Type  Name  Details 
Intervention  epidural group  Patients in epidural group, will be placed in left lateral position and epidural catheter will be placed in T5-T6 using 18 guage Tuohy needle under mild sedation with 10-20mg of titrated doses of propofol.  
Comparator Agent  General anaesthesia group  surgery will be performed under balanced general anaesthesia 
 
Inclusion Criteria  
Age From  18.00 Year(s)
Age To  60.00 Year(s)
Gender  Female 
Details  Patients aged 18–60 years, of the American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 2–3 undergoing unilateral modified radical mastectomy  
 
ExclusionCriteria 
Details  Patients with any contraindications to epidural, infection at the site of the planned epidural placement, any coagulation disorders, or known allergy to lignocaine or any anaesthetic drug  
 
Method of Generating Random Sequence   Computer generated randomization 
Method of Concealment   Sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes 
Blinding/Masking   Open Label 
Primary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
Post operative pain score between the two groups.   Post operative period up to 12h  
 
Secondary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
1. Incidence of postoperative hoarseness of voice, cough, PONV,
2. Intra operative and postop analgesic requirement
3. Duration of hospital and ICU stay
4. Anaesthetic cost
5. ICU and hospital stay
6. Patient and surgeon satisfaction
 
Post operative period up to 12h 
 
Target Sample Size   Total Sample Size="50"
Sample Size from India="50" 
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" 
Phase of Trial   Phase 3 
Date of First Enrollment (India)   15/06/2020 
Date of Study Completion (India) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Date of First Enrollment (Global)  Date Missing 
Date of Study Completion (Global) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Estimated Duration of Trial   Years="0"
Months="6"
Days="0" 
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
Modification(s)  
Not Applicable 
Recruitment Status of Trial (India)  Open to Recruitment 
Publication Details   Nil 
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement

Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?  

Brief Summary  

Breast cancer is the most common cause of cancer in women. Surgery, pain, opioid use, stress hormones and immune-suppression are suspected to have an influence on cancer recurrence. Animal studies have shown that opioids, volatile anesthetics, thiopental, and ketamine, could inhibit natural killer cell (NK) activity and cause cancer metastasis. But propofol has anti-inflammatory properties and aids in the preservation of NK cell activity.

Breast surgeries are commonly performed under balanced general anaesthesia along with regional plane blocks to reduce the consumption of opioids. However, limitations include technical difficulties and increased possibilities of complications like pneumothorax. Moreover use of blocks alone as an anaesthetic technique is not feasible. We hypothesized that the use of thoracic epidural anaesthesia would provide complete anaesthesia for performing modified radical mastectomy thereby reducing the postoperative complications, ICU and hospital stay and reduced health care cost. Primary objective is to compare post operative pain score between the two groups. Secondary objectives include incidence of postoperative hoarseness of voice, cough, PONV, intra operative and postop analgesic requirement, duration of hospital and ICU stay, anaesthetic cost, patient and surgeon satisfaction.

Methods

This prospective, randomised study will be conducted after obtaining approval from hospital ethical committee, clinical trial registry of India (CTRI) and informed written consent from patients.  Patients aged 18–60 years, of the American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 2–3 undergoing unilateral modified radical mastectomy will be included in this study. Patients with any contraindications to epidural, infection at the site of the planned epidural placement, any coagulation disorders, or known allergy to lignocaine or any anaesthetic drug will be excluded from the study.

The patients will be randomly assigned into two equal groups, G and E based on computer-generated random sequence of numbers. Concealment will be achieved by closed envelope technique.  Patients in both groups will receive oral ranitidine 150 mg, metoclopramide10 mg, and alprazolam 0.25 mg on the night before surgery and ranitidine 150 mg and metoclopramide 10 mg on the morning of surgery. In the operation theatre, intravenous (IV) cannula will be inserted and monitoring with electrocardiography, noninvasive blood pressure monitor, and pulse‑oximeter will be done. Standard general anaesthesia protocol will be followed in group G. Patients will be preoxygenated with 100% O2; glycopyrrolate 0.2 mg, midazolam 2 mg, and fentanyl 2 µg/kg will be given intravenously. They will then be induced with IV propofol 1.5–2.5 mg/kg till there is loss of response to verbal Command and patient becomes apnoeic. Classic LMA size 3/4 will be inserted after full deflation. Patient will be maintained on O2, N2O and isoflurane 0.5%–1.5%. LMA cuffs will be filled with 20/30 ml of room air. Patients will be maintained on spontaneous ventilation.

Patients in group E, will be placed in left lateral position and under strict aseptic precautions epidural catheter will be placed in T5-T6 using 18 gauge Tuohy needle under mild sedation with 10-20mg of titrated doses of propofol. Supplemental oxygen 5 L/min will be administered through a face mask for the entire duration of the surgery. The epidural catheter will be inserted 3-5cm into the epidural space. A test dose of 3 mL of  2% lignocaine with epinephrine 1:200,000 will be given to excludE intravascular or intrathecal injection.  Titrated dose of 5–8 mL of 2% lignocaine will be injected through the catheter and anaesthetic dermatomal levels achieved will be determined by a pinprick. Following this, a titrated infusion of the same drug will be maintained.

 

 

Toward the end of the surgery, IV ondansetron 4 mg and IV paracetamol 1 g will be given to patients in both groups and the surgeon will give local infiltration with 5–10 mL of  2% lignocaine. In group G, on completion of the surgery, LMA will be removed after suctioning and deflating the cuff. The epidural catheter is removed at the end of surgery in group E. Four hours after surgery all patients will receive oral paracetamol 650 mg 8th hourly. Patients will be given rescue analgesia with IV ketorolac 1mg.kg−1 if the patient complained of pain. The total dose of ketorolac given in the first 24 h will be noted for both groups.

Postoperative sore throat, cough, hoarseness, VAS scores, nausea, vomiting, monitoring will be done in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) by the anaesthetist who will be blinded to the group allocation and the responses will be noted at 0, 2, 4, 12, and 24 h. The patients will be asked to grade POST, cough, and hoarseness using a predefined category scale with scores 0–3 and nausea vomiting will be graded as 0-2. Total intra-operative, as well as post-operative opioid consumptions, will be documented. The incidence of postoperative side effects (e.g., nausea, vomiting, dizziness), duration of the postanesthesia care unit and hospital stays, was documented. Pain intensity will be assessed using numerical pain scale 0–10 (0=no pain to 10=worst imaginable pain). Postanesthesia recovery was evaluated by using the modified Aldrete score system involving the level of consciousness, motor activity, respiration, and circulation. An Aldrete score of 10 (patient fully awake, oriented, and comfortable, with stable cardiovascular and respiratory signs) will be used for discharge from the postanesthesia care unit. Home readiness was assessed by the operating surgeon.  Patient satisfaction with the anaesthetic experience was noted. All were asked to rate their overall experience with the anaesthetic technique as “satisfactory” or “unsatisfactory.”We will also be comparing the anaesthesia charges between the two groups.

 
Close