Dental implants are now a reliable solution for the
functional and aesthetic rehabilitation of partially and completely edentulous
patients. In order to achieve long term survival, osseointegration of dental
implant needs to occur, that is, direct connection between the bone and implant
surface without interposition of the fibrous tissue.
Osseointegration is a complex phenomenon and
depends on many factors, some related to the implant (material, macroscopic
design and implant surface), some to the surgical prosthetic
protocol (surgical technique, loading conditions and time) and others to
patient (quantity and quality of bone at the receiving site and the host
response)
In spite of the high survival rate of
implant, early failures occur even when optimal materials are used, surgical
protocols are strictly followed and the quantity/quality of bone at recipient
site is sufficient.
All these observations would suggest the
existence of specific patient related risk factors, this promotes an
investigation into regulatory mechanisms controlling bone metabolism, bone
remodeling and bone turnover.
Vitamin D plays a fundamental role in bone
metabolism. It is a fat soluble vitamin which promotes the absorption of
calcium in the intestine and regulates calcium and phosphate homeostasis in the
tissues and fundamental element in mineralization of bones and teeth. It
stimulates the activity of osteoclasts and increases the production of
extracellular matrix proteins by osteoblasts. It also plays a role in innate
and adaptive immune response.
Importance of Vitamin D and its effects on
bone metabolism is known but very few studies have investigated the effects of
its depletion on stability of dental implants. Almost all studies have been
done on animal models. Unfortunately very few prospective clinical studies have
so far investigated the effects of vitamin D deficiency on osseointegration and
stability of implant in humans.
The purpose of this study is
to investigate correlation between levels of Serum Vitamin D and Serum Calcium
on stability of implant.
Review of literature
1. Mangano et al (2016) carried out a retrospective clinical study to
investigate if there is a link between low levels of vitamin D in blood and
increased implant failures and found an increasing trend in incidence of early
implant failure with worsening of Vitamin D deficiency
but failed to prove an effective link between low serum levels of vitamin D and
increased risk of early implant failure.
2. In orthopaedics, Maier G S et
al (2014) founded the risk to develop a peri-prosthetic joint
infection has been associated with a low vitamin D level. 3. Kelly et al (2009) demonstrated that vitamin D deficiency
could significantly compromise the establishment of osseointegration of Ti6Al4V
implants in rats. 4. Dvorak et al (2011) found Vitamin D deficiency has a
negative impact on peri-implant bone formation in ovariectomized rats, which
can be compensated by Vitamin D supplementation. 5. Zhou et al (2012) concluded that 1,25(OH)2D3 improves implant
osseointegration in osteoporotic rats. 6. Bashutski JD et al (2011) concluded that Vitamin D deficiency at
the time of periodontal surgery negatively affects periodontal treatment
outcomes for up to 1 yr and Vitamin D status may be critical for post-surgical
healing. 7. Choukroun J et al (2014) suggested exploration of vitamin D serum
level and LDL Cholesterol in the case of a failure of a bone graft or
implant placement. 8. Fretwurst T et al (2016) illustrated two case reports with
vitamin D deficiency and early implant failure and further concluded that
Prospective, randomized clinical trials must follow to affirm the relationship
between vitamin D deficiency, osteoimmunology, and early implant failure. 9. Wagner F et al (2017) stated that there is no
contraindication to place dental implants in osteoporotic patients although
osteoporosis significantly influence the peri-implant bone remodelling. 10. Salomóâ€Coll O et al (2016) concluded that With the limitation of animal studies,
topical application of vitamin D on dental implants could reduce crestal bone
loss and increase 10% more boneâ€toâ€implant contact at 12â€week followâ€up period. 11. Trindade R et al (2015) concluded that Osseointegration of
implant devices may also be affected potentially by bone cells and mediators
that populate the osseous tissue. 12. Swami et al (2016) stated that RFA can be used to
evaluate the effect of early and delayed loading, assess stability over a
period of time and early diagnosis of implant failure. 13. Sennerby et al (2000)The resonance frequency analysis technique
can supply clinically relevant information about the state of the implant–bone
interface at any stage of the treatment or at follow-up examinations. 14. Sennerby L et al (2015) stated that implants with low and/or falling ISQ values pose
an increased risk for failure compared with implants with high and/or
increasing values. 15. Becker W et al (2018) compared two clinical instruments for
resonance frequency analysis and found that Penguin RFA was less cumbersome to
utilize and the window revealing the readings was very easier to read.
|