FULL DETAILS (Read-only)  -> Click Here to Create PDF for Current Dataset of Trial
CTRI Number  CTRI/2020/09/027663 [Registered on: 08/09/2020] Trial Registered Prospectively
Last Modified On: 13/11/2022
Post Graduate Thesis  Yes 
Type of Trial  Interventional 
Type of Study   Surgical/Anesthesia 
Study Design  Randomized, Parallel Group Trial 
Public Title of Study   Is Erector Spinae Plane block a replacement for epidural analgesia for pain relief after Hip replacement surgery? A comparative study. 
Scientific Title of Study   Comparison of the post-operative analgesic efficacy of Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block versus that of Epidural Blockade in hip replacement surgeries 
Trial Acronym   
Secondary IDs if Any  
Secondary ID  Identifier 
NIL  NIL 
 
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)  
Name  Mathew George 
Designation  Associate Professor 
Affiliation  Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences And Research Centre 
Address  Department of Anaesthesiology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research centre, AIMS P.O., Ponekkara, Ernakulam

Ernakulam
KERALA
682041
India 
Phone  9447841795  
Fax    
Email  mathew.doc@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Scientific Query
 
Name  Mathew George 
Designation  Associate Professor 
Affiliation  Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences And Research Centre 
Address  Kodiyattil, Kadungallur Rd., Thottakattukara P.O., Aluva, Ernakulam
Department of Anaesthesiology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research centre, AIMS P.O., Ponekkara, Ernakulam

KERALA
683108
India 
Phone  9447841795  
Fax    
Email  mathew.doc@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Public Query
 
Name  Devi Padmakumar 
Designation  Junior Resident-Year 2 
Affiliation  Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences And Research Centre 
Address  Department of Anaesthesiology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research centre, AIMS P.O., Ponekkara, Ernakulam

Ernakulam
KERALA
682041
India 
Phone  9496096185  
Fax    
Email  devi.pkumar93@gmail.com  
 
Source of Monetary or Material Support  
Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Center, AIMS P.O., Edapally Ernakulam, Kerala 682041 India 
 
Primary Sponsor  
Name  Dr Mathew George 
Address  "Kodiyattil", Kadungallur Rd, Thottakattukara P.O., Aluva, 683108 
Type of Sponsor  Other [Self] 
 
Details of Secondary Sponsor  
Name  Address 
Amritha Institute Of Medical Sciences and Research Center   AIMS P.O., Edapally, Ernakulam Kerala 682041  
 
Countries of Recruitment     India  
Sites of Study  
No of Sites = 1  
Name of Principal Investigator  Name of Site  Site Address  Phone/Fax/Email 
Dr Mathew George  Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Centre  Department of Anaesthesiology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research centre, AIMS P.O., Ponnekara, Ernakulam 682041
Ernakulam
KERALA 
9447841795

mathew.doc@gmail.com 
 
Details of Ethics Committee  
No of Ethics Committees= 1  
Name of Committee  Approval Status 
Institutional Ethics Committee, AIMS , Kochi  Approved 
 
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI  
Status 
Not Applicable 
 
Health Condition / Problems Studied  
Health Type  Condition 
Patients  (1) ICD-10 Condition: M160||Bilateral primary osteoarthritis of hip, (2) ICD-10 Condition: S720||Fracture of head and neck of femur, (3) ICD-10 Condition: M131||Monoarthritis, not elsewhere classified, (4) ICD-10 Condition: M16||Osteoarthritis of hip,  
 
Intervention / Comparator Agent  
Type  Name  Details 
Comparator Agent  Lumbar Epidural Blockade  A lumbar epidural block will be placed using an epidural catheter placed at the beginning of the surgery, through which local anaesthetic drug Ropivacaine 0.2% will be administered. 
Intervention  Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Blockade  Local anaesthetic drug is deposited using ultrasound guidance between the erector spinae muscle and the lumbar transverse process 
 
Inclusion Criteria  
Age From  22.00 Year(s)
Age To  99.00 Year(s)
Gender  Both 
Details  Adult patients planned for elective hip replacement surgery belonging to American Society of Anesthetists Physical Status 1 to 3  
 
ExclusionCriteria 
Details  1. Patient refusal
2. Known allergy to local anesthetics
3. Infection at site
4. Bleeding diathesis or patients on any anti-coagulants
5. Inability to provide informed consent
6. ASA PS 4 or 5 patients.
 
 
Method of Generating Random Sequence   Random Number Table 
Method of Concealment   An Open list of random numbers 
Blinding/Masking   Participant Blinded 
Primary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
Adequacy of analgesia as assessed by the Numeric Rating Score for post -operative acute pain, and difference in narcotic consumption between the 2 groups  Hourly for the first 6 hours postoperatively and second hourly after that up to 24 hours post-operatively 
 
Secondary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
Incidence of analgesic technique related adverse effects or complications in the post-operative period. This includes hypotension, urinary retention, paraesthesia, bleeding from block site and motor blockade  Hourly for the first 6 hours postoperatively and second hourly after that up to 24 hours post-operatively 
 
Target Sample Size   Total Sample Size="34"
Sample Size from India="34" 
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "34"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="34" 
Phase of Trial   Phase 3 
Date of First Enrollment (India)   26/09/2020 
Date of Study Completion (India) 30/06/2022 
Date of First Enrollment (Global)  Date Missing 
Date of Study Completion (Global) Date Missing 
Estimated Duration of Trial   Years="2"
Months="0"
Days="0" 
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
Modification(s)  
Not Applicable 
Recruitment Status of Trial (India)  Completed 
Publication Details   Nil 
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement

Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?  

Response - NO
Brief Summary   We are attempting to compare a new analgesic block- erector spinal plane block, to the current standard analgesia after hip surgery that is epidural analgesia. Epidural analgesia is associated with certain shortcomings in the postoperative period, and thus erector spinal plane block is being evaluated as a suitable alternative.
Our study design aims to include patients undergoing hip arthroplasty surgery who will be randomised to receive either technique. Participants will be blinded to the analgesic technique being used. Postoperatively the patients will be evaluated for 24 hours by the attending nursing staff in the recovery area with special emphasis on their pain relief as assessed by Numerical Rating Scale (1-10) and incidence of any complications if any, with respect to the analgesic technique provided. All patients will be given supplemental analgesia with intravenous agents in case their block appears to be ineffective. We will be analysing based on a Number Needed to treat analysis.
 
Close