FULL DETAILS (Read-only)  -> Click Here to Create PDF for Current Dataset of Trial
CTRI Number  CTRI/2020/01/022636 [Registered on: 07/01/2020] Trial Registered Prospectively
Last Modified On: 03/05/2023
Post Graduate Thesis  No 
Type of Trial  Interventional 
Type of Study   Drug
Radiation Therapy 
Study Design  Randomized, Parallel Group, Active Controlled Trial 
Public Title of Study   Lutetium DOTATATE plus capecitabine in advanced neuroendocrine tumours 
Scientific Title of Study   Concomitant 177Lu-DOTATATE low dose capecitabine versus 177Lu - DOTATATE alone in patients with advanced well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours-randomized controlled trial. 
Trial Acronym   
Secondary IDs if Any  
Secondary ID  Identifier 
NIL  NIL 
 
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)  
Name  Ashwani Sood 
Designation  Additional Professor 
Affiliation  PGIMER 
Address  Department of Nuclear Medicine
Sector-12
Chandigarh
CHANDIGARH
160012
India 
Phone    
Fax    
Email  sood99@yahoo.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Scientific Query
 
Name  Ashwani Sood 
Designation  Additional Professor 
Affiliation  PGIMER 
Address  Department of Nuclear Medicine
Sector-12

CHANDIGARH
160012
India 
Phone    
Fax    
Email  sood99@yahoo.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Public Query
 
Name  Ashwani Sood 
Designation  Additional Professor 
Affiliation  PGIMER 
Address  Department of Nuclear Medicine
Sector-12

CHANDIGARH
160012
India 
Phone    
Fax    
Email  sood99@yahoo.com  
 
Source of Monetary or Material Support  
Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research Chandigarh 
 
Primary Sponsor  
Name  Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research Chandigarh 
Address  Sector 12 Chandigarh 
Type of Sponsor  Research institution and hospital 
 
Details of Secondary Sponsor  
Name  Address 
NIL  NIL 
 
Countries of Recruitment     India  
Sites of Study  
No of Sites = 1  
Name of Principal Investigator  Name of Site  Site Address  Phone/Fax/Email 
Dr Ashwani Sood  Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh  Department of Nuclear Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research Sector 12
Chandigarh
CHANDIGARH 
9781814203

sood99@yahoo.com 
 
Details of Ethics Committee  
No of Ethics Committees= 1  
Name of Committee  Approval Status 
Institutional Ethics Committee  Approved 
 
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI  
Status 
Not Applicable 
 
Health Condition / Problems Studied  
Health Type  Condition 
Patients  (1) ICD-10 Condition: C7A0||Malignant carcinoid tumors,  
 
Intervention / Comparator Agent  
Type  Name  Details 
Comparator Agent  177Lu-DOTATATE alone  177Lu – DOTATATE approximately 7.4 GBq (200 mCi) per cycle. up to 4 cycles at 8 weekly intervals 
Intervention  177Lu-DOTATATE plus capecitabine   177Lu – DOTATATE approximately 7.4 GBq (200 mCi) per cycle. up to 4 cycles, at 8 weekly intervals Oral capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 per day from days 0 to 14 of each PRRT cycle 
 
Inclusion Criteria  
Age From  18.00 Year(s)
Age To  80.00 Year(s)
Gender  Both 
Details  Adults ≥ 18 years with histopathologically proven, well-differentiated grade 1/2 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours

Progressive inoperable/metastatic disease during or after ≤ 2 prior systemic therapies

Significant somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression in 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT defined as SUVmax of lesion being significantly (1.5 x) greater than that of normal liver

Dedifferentiation excluded using 18F-FDG PET/CT as per the NETPET score

ECOG performance 0-2

Estimated life expectancy of at least 8 months

Adequate renal function – GFR ≥ 50 mL/min (as estimated by 99mTc DTPA GFR)

Stable haematological parameters:
Haemoglobin ≥ 8 g/dL
Total leucocyte count ≥ 2000/mcL
Platelets ≥ 70000/mcL

Adequate liver function:
Bilirubin ≤ 3 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
AST, ALT, ALP ≤ 2.5 x ULN (or ≤ 5.0 x ULN in the presence of liver metastases)
Albumin ≥ 3.0 g/dL
 
 
ExclusionCriteria 
Details  Patient not willing to give the consent

Primary tumours other than gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours

Grade 3 neuroendocrine tumours

Cytotoxic chemotherapy or targeted therapy including somatostatin analogues within the last four weeks

Prior Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy

Prior Selective Internal Radiation Therapy with 90Y microspheres for liver lesions

Any other active malignancy

Poorly controlled concurrent medical illness e.g. uncontrolled diabetes, cardiac disease, severe infection

Malabsorption syndromes that might impair absorption of Capecitabine

Pregnant and lactating female patients
 
 
Method of Generating Random Sequence   Computer generated randomization 
Method of Concealment   Sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes 
Blinding/Masking   Open Label 
Primary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
Objective response rate, i.e. proportion of patients with complete response plus partial response (as per RECIST 1.1), assessed by 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT   At around 8 weeks after 2nd cycle and completion of treatment 
 
Secondary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
Disease Control Rate  At around 8 weeks after 2nd cycle and completion of treatment 
Biochemical response rate i.e proportion of patients achieving ≥50% reduction in serum chromogranin A level   At around 8 weeks after 2nd cycle and completion of treatment 
Health related quality of life assessed using EORTC QLQ – C30 questionnaire   At around 8 weeks after 2nd cycle and completion of treatment 
Proportion of serious adverse events, assessed using CTCAE version 5.0  Every 3 weeks post each treatment cycle 
Progression free survival   Estimated from the first PRRT cycle till documented radiological disease progression (as per RECIST 1.1). Patients will be followed up for a minimum of 2 years 
 
Target Sample Size   Total Sample Size="50"
Sample Size from India="50" 
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" 
Phase of Trial   Phase 2 
Date of First Enrollment (India)   08/01/2020 
Date of Study Completion (India) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Date of First Enrollment (Global)  Date Missing 
Date of Study Completion (Global) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Estimated Duration of Trial   Years="2"
Months="0"
Days="0" 
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
Modification(s)  
Not Applicable 
Recruitment Status of Trial (India)  Closed to Recruitment of Participants 
Publication Details   NIL 
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement

Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?  

Brief Summary  

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NETs) are a rare group of malignancies that have shown an increased global burden over the recent decades with an incidence of 3.56 per 1,00,000 persons. The 2017 WHO classification categorized pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) into two broad types: well-differentiated pancreatic NEN, also referred as neuroendocrine tumour (NET) and poorly-differentiated NEN, otherwise known as neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). NETs were further subcategorized into grades depending on the Ki-67 proliferation index and mitotic index: G1 (Ki-67 index < 3% and mitotic index < 2/10 high-power fields); G2 (Ki-67 index 3-20 % and mitotic index 2-20/10 high-power fields); and G3 (Ki-67 index > 20% and mitotic index > 20/10 high-power fields).

Most of the NETs progress slowly over the years, however, the aggressiveness varies according to the primary site. While small intestinal NETs tend to progress indolently in the metastatic setting, gastric and rectal NETs often have a rapid progression once they become metastatic. Treatment options for advanced inoperable or metastatic GEP-NETs are currently limited. While somatostatin analogues viz. octreotide and lanreotide are widely used as first-line treatment for advanced GEP-NETs, targeted and cytotoxic chemotherapy are reserved for progressive disease. However, more often than not, disease progression eventually ensues and there exists a lack of therapeutic alternatives. Further, the adverse effects and costs associated with these treatment modalities often limit their practical utility for patients especially in low to middle income countries. In this setting, Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) offers an attractive option with encouraging results over several retrospective and prospective studies.

Increased somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression in NETs as demonstrated by high-grade uptake on SSTR scintigraphy provides the rationale for the use of PRRT in NETs, especially G1 and G2. The PRRT agents consist of a radionuclide (90Y-Yttrium 90 or 177Lu-Lutetium 177) linked to a peptide (SSTR agonist either TOC-Tyr3 Octreotide or TATE-Tyr3Octreotate or TATE ) by means of a chelator (DOTA). The binding of the agents to the SSTRs on the tumour cell membrane enables the delivery of the beta emitting radionuclides, thereby leading to cellular damage. Of the PRRTs, 177Lu-DOTATATE is the only FDA approved agent for advanced/unresectable GEP-NETs. The approval was based on the NETTER-1 trial comprising 229 patients with progressive, well-differentiated, locally advanced/inoperable or metastatic SSTR positive mid gut NET.

In recent times, few retrospective studies have shown combination therapies of PRRT with capecitabine to be effective in advanced NETs. In a retrospective study by Ballal et al., patients treated with concomitant 177Lu – DOTATATE and capecitabine had better objective response and overall survival as compared to those treated with 177Lu – DOTATATE alone. Capecitabine, administered in suboptimal doses in this setting as a radiosensitizer, acts by inducing DNA damage and inhibiting cell repair and thereby is suggested to have a synergistic role with PRRT. Few other studies have also demonstrated the safety of this combination approach. However, no prospective study has yet been conducted to establish the added benefit associated with this combination approach over standalone PRRT. In this prospective phase 2 study, we intend to compare the efficacy and safety of concomitant 177Lu-DOTATATE plus capecitabine and 177Lu – DOTATATE alone in patients with advanced inoperable/metastatic well differentiated GEP-NETs. 
Close