| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2020/01/022636 [Registered on: 07/01/2020] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
03/05/2023 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
No |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Drug Radiation Therapy |
| Study Design |
Randomized, Parallel Group, Active Controlled Trial |
|
Public Title of Study
|
Lutetium DOTATATE plus capecitabine in advanced neuroendocrine tumours |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
Concomitant 177Lu-DOTATATE low dose capecitabine versus 177Lu - DOTATATE alone in patients with advanced well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours-randomized controlled trial. |
| Trial Acronym |
|
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
Ashwani Sood |
| Designation |
Additional Professor |
| Affiliation |
PGIMER |
| Address |
Department of Nuclear Medicine Sector-12 Chandigarh CHANDIGARH 160012 India |
| Phone |
|
| Fax |
|
| Email |
sood99@yahoo.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Ashwani Sood |
| Designation |
Additional Professor |
| Affiliation |
PGIMER |
| Address |
Department of Nuclear Medicine Sector-12
CHANDIGARH 160012 India |
| Phone |
|
| Fax |
|
| Email |
sood99@yahoo.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Ashwani Sood |
| Designation |
Additional Professor |
| Affiliation |
PGIMER |
| Address |
Department of Nuclear Medicine Sector-12
CHANDIGARH 160012 India |
| Phone |
|
| Fax |
|
| Email |
sood99@yahoo.com |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
| Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research Chandigarh |
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research Chandigarh |
| Address |
Sector 12 Chandigarh |
| Type of Sponsor |
Research institution and hospital |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Dr Ashwani Sood |
Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh |
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research
Sector 12 Chandigarh CHANDIGARH |
9781814203
sood99@yahoo.com |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| Institutional Ethics Committee |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Patients |
(1) ICD-10 Condition: C7A0||Malignant carcinoid tumors, |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Comparator Agent |
177Lu-DOTATATE alone |
177Lu – DOTATATE approximately 7.4 GBq (200 mCi) per cycle. up to 4 cycles at 8 weekly intervals |
| Intervention |
177Lu-DOTATATE plus capecitabine |
177Lu – DOTATATE approximately 7.4 GBq (200 mCi) per cycle. up to 4 cycles, at 8 weekly intervals
Oral capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 per day from days 0 to 14 of each PRRT cycle |
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
18.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
80.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Both |
| Details |
Adults ≥ 18 years with histopathologically proven, well-differentiated grade 1/2 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours
Progressive inoperable/metastatic disease during or after ≤ 2 prior systemic therapies
Significant somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression in 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT defined as SUVmax of lesion being significantly (1.5 x) greater than that of normal liver
Dedifferentiation excluded using 18F-FDG PET/CT as per the NETPET score
ECOG performance 0-2
Estimated life expectancy of at least 8 months
Adequate renal function – GFR ≥ 50 mL/min (as estimated by 99mTc DTPA GFR)
Stable haematological parameters:
Haemoglobin ≥ 8 g/dL
Total leucocyte count ≥ 2000/mcL
Platelets ≥ 70000/mcL
Adequate liver function:
Bilirubin ≤ 3 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
AST, ALT, ALP ≤ 2.5 x ULN (or ≤ 5.0 x ULN in the presence of liver metastases)
Albumin ≥ 3.0 g/dL
|
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
Patient not willing to give the consent
Primary tumours other than gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours
Grade 3 neuroendocrine tumours
Cytotoxic chemotherapy or targeted therapy including somatostatin analogues within the last four weeks
Prior Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy
Prior Selective Internal Radiation Therapy with 90Y microspheres for liver lesions
Any other active malignancy
Poorly controlled concurrent medical illness e.g. uncontrolled diabetes, cardiac disease, severe infection
Malabsorption syndromes that might impair absorption of Capecitabine
Pregnant and lactating female patients
|
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Computer generated randomization |
|
Method of Concealment
|
Sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Open Label |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| Objective response rate, i.e. proportion of patients with complete response plus partial response (as per RECIST 1.1), assessed by 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT |
At around 8 weeks after 2nd cycle and completion of treatment |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| Disease Control Rate |
At around 8 weeks after 2nd cycle and completion of treatment |
| Biochemical response rate i.e proportion of patients achieving ≥50% reduction in serum chromogranin A level |
At around 8 weeks after 2nd cycle and completion of treatment |
| Health related quality of life assessed using EORTC QLQ – C30 questionnaire |
At around 8 weeks after 2nd cycle and completion of treatment |
| Proportion of serious adverse events, assessed using CTCAE version 5.0 |
Every 3 weeks post each treatment cycle |
| Progression free survival |
Estimated from the first PRRT cycle till documented radiological disease progression (as per RECIST 1.1). Patients will be followed up for a minimum of 2 years |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="50" Sample Size from India="50"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
Phase 2 |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
08/01/2020 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="2" Months="0" Days="0" |
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
Modification(s)
|
Not Applicable |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Closed to Recruitment of Participants |
|
Publication Details
|
NIL |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
|
|
Brief Summary
|
Gastroenteropancreatic
neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NETs) are a rare group of malignancies that have
shown an increased global burden over the recent decades with an incidence of
3.56 per 1,00,000 persons. The 2017 WHO classification categorized
pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) into two broad types: well-differentiated
pancreatic NEN, also referred as neuroendocrine tumour (NET) and poorly-differentiated
NEN, otherwise known as neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). NETs were further
subcategorized into grades depending on the Ki-67 proliferation index and
mitotic index: G1 (Ki-67 index < 3% and mitotic index < 2/10 high-power
fields); G2 (Ki-67 index 3-20 % and mitotic index 2-20/10 high-power fields); and
G3 (Ki-67 index > 20% and mitotic index > 20/10 high-power fields).
Most of the NETs
progress slowly over the years, however, the aggressiveness varies according to
the primary site. While small
intestinal NETs tend to progress indolently in the metastatic setting, gastric
and rectal NETs often have a rapid progression once they become metastatic.
Treatment options for advanced inoperable or metastatic GEP-NETs are currently
limited. While somatostatin analogues viz. octreotide
and lanreotide are widely used as first-line treatment for advanced GEP-NETs, targeted
and cytotoxic chemotherapy are reserved for progressive disease. However,
more often than not, disease progression eventually ensues and there exists a
lack of therapeutic alternatives. Further, the adverse effects and costs
associated with these treatment modalities often limit their practical utility
for patients especially in low to middle income countries. In this setting,
Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) offers an attractive option with
encouraging results over several retrospective and prospective studies.
Increased
somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression in NETs as demonstrated by high-grade
uptake on SSTR scintigraphy provides the rationale for the use of PRRT in NETs,
especially G1 and G2. The PRRT agents consist of a radionuclide (90Y-Yttrium
90 or 177Lu-Lutetium 177) linked to a peptide (SSTR agonist either TOC-Tyr3
Octreotide or TATE-Tyr3Octreotate or TATE ) by means of a chelator (DOTA). The
binding of the agents to the SSTRs on the tumour cell membrane enables the
delivery of the beta emitting radionuclides, thereby leading to cellular damage. Of the PRRTs, 177Lu-DOTATATE is the only FDA approved agent
for advanced/unresectable GEP-NETs. The approval was based on the NETTER-1
trial comprising 229 patients with progressive, well-differentiated, locally
advanced/inoperable or metastatic SSTR positive mid gut NET.
In recent times, few
retrospective studies have shown combination therapies of PRRT with
capecitabine to be effective in advanced NETs. In a retrospective study
by Ballal et al., patients treated with concomitant 177Lu – DOTATATE
and capecitabine had better objective response and overall survival as compared
to those treated with 177Lu – DOTATATE alone. Capecitabine,
administered in suboptimal doses in this setting as a radiosensitizer, acts by
inducing DNA damage and inhibiting cell repair and thereby is suggested to have
a synergistic role with PRRT. Few other studies have also demonstrated the
safety of this combination approach. However, no prospective study has
yet been conducted to establish the added benefit associated with this
combination approach over standalone PRRT. In this prospective phase 2 study,
we intend to compare the efficacy and safety of concomitant 177Lu-DOTATATE
plus capecitabine and 177Lu – DOTATATE alone in patients with
advanced inoperable/metastatic well differentiated GEP-NETs. |