| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2011/12/002264 [Registered on: 21/12/2011] Trial Registered Retrospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
24/09/2013 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
Yes |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Drug Surgical/Anesthesia Radiation Therapy |
| Study Design |
Non-randomized, Multiple Arm Trial |
|
Public Title of Study
|
Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy, given either together or sequentially, before surgery followed by surgery in operable cancer of gallbladder patients: A pilot study |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
Concurrent versus sequential neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy followed by surgery in operable carcinoma gallbladder patients: A pilot study |
| Trial Acronym |
|
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
Dr Ameet Kumar |
| Designation |
Senior resident |
| Affiliation |
All India Institute of Medical Sciences |
| Address |
Dept of GI Surgery
Room no 1005, Teaching block
All India Institute of Medical Sciences
Ansari Nagar,
New Delhi Ansari Nagar,
New Delhi New Delhi DELHI 110029 India |
| Phone |
9013818845 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
mythurs@hotmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Prof Peush Sahni |
| Designation |
Professor and head |
| Affiliation |
All India Institute of Medical Sciences |
| Address |
Dept of GI Surgery
Room no 1005, Teaching block
All India Institute of Medical Sciences
Ansari Nagar,
New Delhi Ansari Nagar,
New Delhi New Delhi DELHI 110029 India |
| Phone |
01126594879 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
peush_sahni@hotmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Dr Ameet Kumar |
| Designation |
Senior resident |
| Affiliation |
All India Institute of Medical Sciences |
| Address |
Dept of GI Surgery
Room no 1005, Teaching block
All India Institute of Medical Sciences
Ansari Nagar,
New Delhi Ansari Nagar,
New Delhi New Delhi DELHI 110029 India |
| Phone |
9013818845 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
mythurs@hotmail.com |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
All India Institute of Medical Sciences |
| Address |
Ansari Nagar
New Delhi - 110029 |
| Type of Sponsor |
Research institution and hospital |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Dr Ameet Kumar |
AIIMS |
Dept of GI surgery
Teaching block room no 1005
AIIMS
Ansari Nagar New Delhi DELHI |
9013818845
mythurs@hotmail.com |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| institutional ethics committee, AIIMS |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Patients |
patients with operable carcinoma of Gall Bladder, |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Intervention |
Gemcitabine, Oxaliplatin, radiotherapy |
ARM 1: Weekly GEMOX Day 1, 8, 15 and 22 along with concurrent localized field RT of 35 Gy in 15 Fractions, in 3 weeks, followed by Surgery - extended cholecystecomy including en bloc hepatic resection and lymphadenectomy (porta hepatis, gastrohepatic ligament, retroduodenal) with or without bile duct excision (after 4-6 weeks of completing Chemo-RT schedule after assessing for surgical suitability).
|
| Comparator Agent |
Gemcitabine, Oxaliplatin, Radiotherapy |
ARM 2: GEMOX Day 1, 8 every 3 weeks x 2 cycles. Followed by (after 2-3 weeks gap) Localized field RT of 35 Gy in 15 Fractions, in 3 weeks. Followed by Surgery (after 4 weeks of completing Chemo-RT schedule after assessing for surgical suitability if necessary)
|
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
18.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
65.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Both |
| Details |
a) Subjects with FNAC-proven Gall bladder adenocarcinoma (up to operable stage IVA) which is potentially resectable by preoperative imaging
b) Performance status ECOG-1&2
c) Normal renal, hepatic, and hematologic function at the time of enrolment
d) Age 18-65 years
|
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
a) Patient refusal
b) Poor performance status (ECOG – 3&4)
c) Major co-morbid conditions like cirrhosis, renal failure, uncontrolled hypertension or cardiac failure -
d) Subjects who have received chemotherapy within 12 months prior to study entry.
e) Prior use of radiotherapy.
f) Subjects who have undergone previous surgery on gall bladder/biliary tree.
g) Any evidence of metastasis to distant organs (liver, lung, peritoneum).
h) Non-contiguous liver metastasis (M1 disease).
i) Major vascular involvement such as proper hepatic artery involvement and main portal vein involvement (T4 – inoperable disease).
j) Periaortic, Pericaval, Superior mesenteric artery and/or Celiac artery lymph node involvement (N2 disease) – confirmed by FNAC.
|
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
|
|
Method of Concealment
|
Alternation |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Not Applicable |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
Ability to achieve surgical resection
Radiological response
|
Ability to achieve surgical resection
Radiological response
|
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
Pathological response
Toxicity
Overall survival (OS)
|
toxicity will be noted during and after chemoradiation, pathological response on histopathological examination of the resected specimen and OS at the end of two years |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="16" Sample Size from India="16"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= ""
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
Phase 2 |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
15/11/2011 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
Date Missing |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Date Missing |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="2" Months="0" Days="0" |
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
Modification(s)
|
Not Applicable |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Completed |
|
Publication Details
|
1. Sharma A , Dwary A, Mohanti BK, Deo SV, Pal S, Sreenivas V, Raina V, Shukla NK, Thulkar S, Garg P, and Chaudhary SP. Best Supportive Care Compared With Chemotherapy for Unresectable Gall Bladder Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Study. JCO Oct 20, 2010:4581
|
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
|
|
Brief Summary
|
Carcinoma of the Gall Bladder is the most common malignancy of the biliary tract and the fifth most common neoplasm of the digestive tract. The highest gallbladder cancer incidence rates worldwide were reported for women in Delhi, India (21.5/100,000), South Karachi, Pakistan (13.8/100,000) and Quito, Ecuador (12.9/100,000). High incidence was found in Korea and Japan and some central and eastern European countries. Female-to-male incidence ratios were generally around 3, but ranged from 1 in Far East Asia to over 5 in Spain and Colombia. As per Delhi cancer registry2003, the crude incidence rate for GBC in females and males were 4.6 and 1.7 per 100,000 population respectively.
Approximately 80% of GBCs are adenocarcinomas and is characterised by early spread to lymph tissues and blood stream giving rise to local invasion, extenve regional lymph node metastasis, vascular encasement, and distant metastases. Because of lack of characteristic early symptoms, the tumor becomes symptomatic only with advanced growth, and three fourths of gallbladder tumors are unresectable at presentation. The overall 5-year survival is 13.7%. The median survival for patients with stage III tumors is 6 months and for those with stage IV is 1-3 months. A review of about 2500 patients with GBC from hospital cancer registries throughout U.S. showed tumour stage to be closely associated with survival; 5-year survival rates were 60%, 39%, 15%, 5% and 1% for patients with stage 0-stage IV disease respectively. Results from a recent retrospective single-centre analysis showed a 10.3 month median survival for the overall population of patients diagnosed with GBC. Median survival was 12 and 5.8 months for those with stage Ia-III and stage IV disease respectively.
In general, GBC is the most aggressive of the biliary cancers with the shortest median survival duration. Complete surgical resection offers the only chance for cure and achievement of R0 resection strongly correlates with long term survival; however, only 10% of patients present with early-stage disease and are considered surgical candidates. Among those patients who do undergo "curative" resection, recurrence rates are high. Even after a curative resection, the overall 5-year survival rate is only 5%.
The main pattern of recurrence is loco regional as well as distant metastasis. In order to improve survival and outcomes in GBC, it is felt that surgery needs to be combined with other modalities like chemotherapy/radiotherapy (CT/RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Therefore, the therapeutic strategy in recent years combines the benefits of surgery with adjuvant CT/CRT. The oncological standpoint is to treat micrometastastic disease thereby reducing the high rates of loco regional recurrences and improve survival. The aim of neo-adjuvant therapy is to expand the benefits of adjuvant CRT/CT over surgery alone to patients in preoperative settings in order to increase resectability and to improve survival.
GBC is an uncommon disease in U.S. and Europe, where the majority of cancer therapy studies are performed. As a result, management protocols for GBC are commonly extrapolated from studies that have included patients with all subsites of biliary tract cancers. However, biliary tract cancer includes cholangiocarcinoma (CC), GBCs, and ampullary tumors. These various tumors are likely to have a different biology and clinical course as evidenced by the fact that patients with CC have a better median survival than patients with GBC. Median survival reported for GBC in various studies is in the range of 4 to 11 months, compared with this, studies involving mainly CC have reported median survival of 15 to 16 months suggesting a difference in the biology of the two diseases.
The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in GBC has not been definitively evaluated in randomized trials. Most studies consist of small, heterogeneous groups of patients seen at a single institution. Several retrospective series and small phase II studies suggest superior outcomes for patients who receive postoperative CRT. Most of the experience in CT comes from trial evaluating CT for advanced GBC. There have been five trials exclusively enrolling GBC patients—one evaluating gemcitabine alone, two gemcitabine–cisplatin combination studies and one gemcitabine carboplatin combination have shown some benefit. The fifth one is a recent randomised controlled study to evaluate efficacy of modified gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (mGEMOX) over best supportive care (BSC) or fluorouracil (FU) and folinic acid (FA) in unresectable gall bladder cancer (GBC) and confirmed the efficacy of mGEMOX. There are not many studies evaluating NACRT in GBC. To date, there is only one phase II trial which tried to address the issue of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) in GBC.
This study is a pilot study to evaluate efficacy and safety of NACRT in patients with operable GBC and aims to compare the outcomes following concurrent and sequential regimes.
|