| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2020/04/024814 [Registered on: 23/04/2020] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
09/11/2020 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
No |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Drug |
| Study Design |
Randomized, Parallel Group Trial |
|
Public Title of Study
|
Comparison of apremilast versus betamethasone oral-mini pulse therapy in the treatment of progressive non-segmental vitiligo |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
Comparison of apremilast versus betamethasone oral-mini pulse therapy in the treatment of progressive non-segmental vitiligo: An open label non-inferiority randomized trial |
| Trial Acronym |
|
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
Dr Vishal Gupta |
| Designation |
Assistant Professor |
| Affiliation |
All India Institute of Medical Sciences |
| Address |
Room 4068A, Department of Dermatology and Venereology, 4th Floor, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi ansari nagar, New Delhi South DELHI 110029 India |
| Phone |
011-26594985 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
doctor.vishalgupta@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Dr Vishal Gupta |
| Designation |
Assistant Professor |
| Affiliation |
All India Institute of Medical Sciences |
| Address |
Room 4068A, Department of Dermatology and Venereology, 4th Floor, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi ansari nagar, New Delhi
DELHI 110029 India |
| Phone |
011-26594985 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
doctor.vishalgupta@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Saurabh Bhatia |
| Designation |
Senior Resident |
| Affiliation |
All India Institute of Medical Sciences |
| Address |
Room 4070, Department of Dermatology and Venereology, 4th Floor, teaching block, All India Institute of Medical Sciences ansari nagar, New Delhi South DELHI 110029 India |
| Phone |
9968370259 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
sabh_kai@hotmail.com |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
| All India Institute of Medical Sciences |
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
All India Institute of Medical Sciences |
| Address |
Ansari Nagar, New Delhi |
| Type of Sponsor |
Research institution and hospital |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Dr Vishal Gupta |
All India Institute of Medical Sciences |
Room 4078A, Department of Dermatology and Venereology, 4th Floor, teaching block South DELHI |
011-26594985
doctor.vishalgupta@gmail.com |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| Institute Ethics Committee |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Patients |
(1) ICD-10 Condition: L80||Vitiligo, |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Intervention |
Apremilast |
Apremilast 30 mg twice daily oral tablets |
| Comparator Agent |
OMP |
Betamethasone 2.5 mg on Saturdays and sundays |
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
18.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
99.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Both |
| Details |
Patients >18 years of age with progressive non-segmental vitiligo (developing new lesions in the past 1 month and/or extension of pre-existing lesions in the past 1 month, VIDA score +4) affecting body surface area >2%. |
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
1. Patients with segmental or stable vitiligo
2. Patients with non-segmental vitiligo involving body surface area <2%.
3. Pregnant and lactating females
4. Patients with known contra-indications to corticosteroids, ie, patients with evidence of active infection; diabetes; hypertension.
5. Patient with a known hypersensitivity to apremilast
6. On topical treatment for last 2 weeks.
7. On systemic treatment and /or phototherapy for last 4 weeks.
|
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Computer generated randomization |
|
Method of Concealment
|
Not Applicable |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Open Label |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
1. Percentage of patients with no new lesions and no extension of pre-existing lesions at every visit, in both the groups
2. Comparison of mean number of new vitiligo lesions during the study period (intra- and inter group comparison)
3. Mean reduction in VIDA score (intra- and inter-group comparison) |
Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
1. Comparison of VESplus. 2. Comparison of VASI
3. Comparison of % re-pigmentation between the two groups
4. Quality of life as assessed by VIS-22
5. Change in Th1, Th2, Th17 and Treg cell markers in the lesional skin
6. Comparison of side-effects between the two treatment groups
|
Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="80" Sample Size from India="80"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
N/A |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
01/05/2020 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="3" Months="0" Days="0" |
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
Modification(s)
|
Not Applicable |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Not Yet Recruiting |
|
Publication Details
|
NIL |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
|
Brief Summary
Modification(s)
|
Title: Comparison of apremilast versus betamethasone oral-mini pulse therapy in the treatment of progressive non-segmental vitiligo: An open label non-inferiority randomized trial Research hypothesis: · Apremilast can halt the progression of spreading vitiligo. · Apremilast is non-inferior to oral mini-pulse therapy (OMP) with Betamethasone sodium monophosphate, in halting the disease progression in progressive non-segmental vitiligo. Aims and objectives: A. Primary Objective: a. To compare the effect of daily apremilast with weekly OMP therapy with betamethasone in achieving stability in patients with progressive non-segmental vitiligo. B. Secondary Objectives: a) To evaluate the re-pigmentation achieved in patients of progressive non-segmental vitiligo b) To compare the improvement in quality of life in the two subsets of patients. c) To compare the side-effect profile of apremilast as compared to OMP d) To evaluate the change in Th1, Th2, Th17 and Tregs in the lesional skin of non-segmental vitiligo patients Study design: Open label randomized non-inferiority trial Study subjects: A. Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients >18 years of age with progressive non-segmental vitiligo (developing new lesions in the past 1 month and/or extension of pre-existing lesions in the past 1 month, VIDA score +4) affecting body surface area >2%. B. Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with segmental or stable vitiligo 2. Patients with non-segmental vitiligo involving body surface area <2%. 3. Pregnant and lactating females 4. Patients with known contra-indications to corticosteroids, ie, patients with evidence of active infection; diabetes; hypertension. 5. Patient with a known hypersensitivity to apremilast 6. On topical treatment for last 2 weeks. 7. On systemic treatment and /or phototherapy for last 4 weeks. Duration of study: 3 years Sample size Assuming anticipated success rate of 80% in the OMP arm and 95% in the apremilast arm at 6 months, taking the power of study at 80%, the alpha error 5% and the non-inferiority margin at 5%, the sample size required to be studied is 32 patients in each arm. Taking approximate 20% attrition, total sample size is estimated at 40 patients in each arm. Detailed clinical history and clinical examination will be done, as well as vitiligo specific examination to note the body surface area involvement. VIDA score would be calculated and noted in the proforma at baseline and at every follow-up visit. Re-pigmentation will be calculated by the VASI score at every follow-up visit. Photographs of the whole body using fixed settings will be taken at baseline and at every follow-up visit. The photographs will be evaluated by 2 investigators blinded to the treatment arm for Vitiligo extent score - plus (Annexure 5, permission to use: Annexure 6) and percentage re-pigmentation on a Likert scale: -1, worse from baseline, 0: no change, +1: <25% re-pigmentation, +2: 25-49%, +3: 50-74%, +4: 75-89%, and +5: 90-100% re-pigmentation. Vitiligo Impact Score-22 (VIS-22) would be evaluated at baseline and at the end of 6 months. Blood investigations including baseline complete blood count, liver function tests, kidney function tests, chest X-ray, fasting blood sugar levels will be done at baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months. Five millilitres of venous blood will be drawn under aseptic precautions at 4 visits (baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months). A 3mm punch biopsy from one of the representative vitiligo lesions at a non-acral site will be taken at the baseline and at 6 months in a subset of patients (n=20, 10 patients in each arm). The skin biopsy specimen will be subjected to analysis of mRNA expression of Th1 (IL-2, IFN-gamma), Th2 (IL-4, IL-13), Th17 (IL-17, IL-22) and T-regulatory (FoxP3) cell specific-markers by real time PCR. Patients would be randomized using random number tables (simple randomization); to be included in one of the two groups, ie, a. Group 1: Patient who would receive 2.5mg betamethasone tablet after breakfast on Saturdays and Sundays for 6 months. b. Group 2: Patients receiving tablet Apremilast, slowly build up daily (10 mg on day 1, 10 mg twice daily on day 2, 20 mg in the morning and 10 mg in the evening on day 3, 20 mg twice daily on day 4, 30 mg in the morning and 20 mg in the evening on day 5, 30 mg twice daily on day 6 and henceforth) for 6 months. For patients not able to tolerate 30 mg twice daily Apremilast, dose would be reduced to 30mg once a day. If apremilast is still not tolerated by the patient, they would be excluded from the study. h. Patients would be followed up every two weeks for the 1st month, then monthly for the next 6 months.
|