| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2020/02/023280 [Registered on: 13/02/2020] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
30/05/2024 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
Yes |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Surgical/Anesthesia |
| Study Design |
Randomized, Parallel Group, Active Controlled Trial |
|
Public Title of Study
|
Comparing different treatment options (plates) in injury to upper part of leg |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
Randomized Control Trial comparing Radiological, Clinical and Functional Outcomes following Uniaxial vs Polyaxial Plating in Management of Tibial Plateau Fractures and CT Guided Mapping of Proximal Tibial Fractures in Indian Population |
| Trial Acronym |
|
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
Apoorva Kabra |
| Designation |
Junior Resident |
| Affiliation |
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi |
| Address |
AIIMS
South DELHI 110029 India |
| Phone |
8830341547 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
apoorvakabra@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Dr Vivek Trikha |
| Designation |
Professor |
| Affiliation |
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi |
| Address |
4th floor, JPNATC, New Delhi
South DELHI 110029 India |
| Phone |
9650430733 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
vivektrikha@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Dr Vivek Trikha |
| Designation |
Professor |
| Affiliation |
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi |
| Address |
4th floor, JPNATC, New Delhi
DELHI 110029 India |
| Phone |
9650430733 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
vivektrikha@gmail.com |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
None |
| Address |
None |
| Type of Sponsor |
Other [None] |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Apoorva Kabra |
Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma Centre, AIIMS and AIIMS |
Department of Orthopedics, Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma Centre, AIIMS and AIIMS South DELHI |
8830341547
apoorvakabra@gmail.com |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| Institute Ethics Committee AIIMS |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Patients |
(1) ICD-10 Condition: S821||Fracture of upper end of tibia, |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Intervention |
Polyaxial Plate |
Polyaxial Plating in Proximal tibial fracture will be undertaken during single surgery which will take approx 2 hours |
| Comparator Agent |
Uniaxial Plate |
Uniaxial Plating in Proximal tibial fracture will be undertaken during single surgery which will take approx 2 hours |
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
18.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
60.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Both |
| Details |
1.All patients with tibial plateau fracture presenting to the institution in this period
2.Age > 18 years and <60 years
3.Fractures involving the proximal tibia
4.Patients giving consent for study
5.Patients operated within 21 days of injury
|
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
1.Age < 18 years and >60 years
2.Prior knee surgery
3.Pre operative history of knee pain or arthritis
4.Prior infection at the site of injury
5.Patients not giving consent
6.Open fractures
7.Fractures associated with vascular injuries in the same limb
8.Polytrauma patients and patients with fractures in the ipsilateral limb
9.Patients operated after 21 days following injury
|
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Stratified block randomization |
|
Method of Concealment
|
Sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Participant and Outcome Assessor Blinded |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
1.To assess clinical outcomes based on Post-operative Pain, Walking Capacity, Range of Motion, Knee Extension, Stability of knee joint clinically, maintenance of reduction and alignment
2.To assess radiological outcomes based on articular depression, condylar widening, progression of osteoarthritis, varus/valgus angulation
3.To assess functional outcomes measured by the Knee Society Severity Score and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
|
2 WEEKS
6 WEEKS
3 MONTHS
6 MONTHS |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
1.To make a template tibia based on CT scans of normal tibia in the Indian Population.
2.To make and analyse a ‘Heat Map’ of fracture lines seen in the Indian population presenting to a Level I Trauma Centre and identify common morphology of proximal tibial fractures.
|
PRE OPERATIVE CT SCANS WILL BE USED |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="40" Sample Size from India="40"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "40"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="40" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
N/A |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
15/02/2020 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
22/02/2024 |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Date Missing |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="2" Months="0" Days="0" |
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
Modification(s)
|
Not Applicable |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Completed |
|
Publication Details
|
Nil |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
|
|
Brief Summary
|
Tibial Plateau Fractures are of varying severity. They are classified using the Scatzker classification in 6 groups (low Grade - I, II, III and high grade - IV, V, VI). They are manged by conventional plating techniques - Conventional plating – Locking plates are commonly used these days and based on the need dual plating is done for bi columnar fractures when single plate cannot hold all fragments together.
Polyaxial locking plates have now been used widely for a variety of fractures and their comparison with uniaxial locking plates has been made in proximal humerus, distal radius and distal femur fractures. However little is known about their satisfactory application in proximal tibial fractures. Most studies undertaken have used biomechanical models and to the best of our knowledge there has been no study comparing the results of uniaxial and polyaxial plates in patients. Polyaxial plates were found to have a good result in an early case study but no further studies have been done since. Thus in our study we aim to compare the two types of plates, Polyaxial and Uniaxial and study results of the same over a period of minimum 6 months based on clinical, radiological and functional criteria. We will compare clinical, radiological and functional outcomes of tibial plateau fractures managed with polyaxial vs uniaxial plates after stratified block randomization of the patients with the type of plate used in each patient being decided intraoperatively using serially numbered opaque envelopes.
Wih modern imaging techniques like CT and MRI their use for classifying proximal tibial fractures has been undertaken, like the 3-column concept by Luo et al and the 4-column concept given by Kfuri et al. But even though we have started using the modern imaging in tibial plateau fractures in India, no study has been done to analyze the fracture patterns in the Indian population. Our study aims to identify the common fracture patterns based on CT scans done for tibial plateau fractures and we have hypothesized that there are consistent fracture patterns and zones of comminution for proximal tibial fracture. A template for this will be made by assessing 50 normal tibial radiographs from the radiology department. CT films from 2 years before onset of study till the end of study will be assessed to look for fracture lines in tibia and these will then be mapped on a single template to further assess weak areas in the tibia and common fracture patterns seen thus giving rise to a ‘heat map’ of fracture distribution in proximal tibia. |