| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2019/04/018768 [Registered on: 24/04/2019] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
12/05/2021 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
Yes |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Dentistry Behavioral |
| Study Design |
Randomized, Parallel Group Trial |
|
Public Title of Study
|
Effectiveness of distraction method in comparison to routine method of guiding behavior of child patient while giving injection for numbing pain |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
Effectiveness of an active and passive distraction technique on the anxiety, behavior and pain levels of children while administering local anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial |
| Trial Acronym |
|
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
Shrehya Shekhar |
| Designation |
Post graduate |
| Affiliation |
Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Mangalore |
| Address |
Room No. 5, Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry,Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Light House Hill Road, Mangalore, Karnataka- 575001
Dakshina Kannada KARNATAKA 575001 India |
| Phone |
9176392221 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
shrehyashekhar@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Shrehya Shekhar |
| Designation |
Post graduate |
| Affiliation |
Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Mangalore |
| Address |
Room No. 5,Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Light House Hill Road, Mangalore, Karnataka- 575001
Dakshina Kannada KARNATAKA 575001 India |
| Phone |
9176392221 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
shrehyashekhar@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Suprabha B S |
| Designation |
Head of Department |
| Affiliation |
MANIPAL COLLEGE OF DENTAL SCIENCES |
| Address |
Room No. 5,Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry,Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Light House Hill Road, Mangalore, Karnataka- 575001
Dakshina Kannada KARNATAKA 575001 India |
| Phone |
9480655538 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
sprbhbhat@yahoo.co.in |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
| Self Funding,
Shrehya Shekhar,
Room no. 5, Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Light House Hill Road, Mangalore, Karnataka- 575001 |
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
Shrehya Shekhar |
| Address |
Room no. 5, Manipal college of dental sciences, Light house hill road, Mangalore- 575001 |
| Type of Sponsor |
Other [Self funding] |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Shrehya Shekhar |
Manipal College of dental sciences |
ROOM NUMBER 5,DEPARTMENT OF PEDODONTICS AND PREVENTIVE DENTISTRY,MANIPAL COLLEGE OF DENTAL SCIENCES, LIGHT HOUSE HILL ROAD, MANGALORE, KARNATAKA-575001 Dakshina Kannada KARNATAKA |
9176392221
shrehyashekhar@gmail.com |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| Institutional ethics committee |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Healthy Human Volunteers |
â— Children who require extraction/pulp therapy/restoration for deep carious lesion treatment in lower primary and first permanent molars under local anesthesia . |
| Patients |
(1) ICD-10 Condition: K049||Other and unspecified diseases ofpulp and periapical tissues, |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Comparator Agent |
not applicable |
not applicable |
| Intervention |
To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of stress ball(active) distraction technique and audiovisual distraction (passive) technique and conventional behavior guidance technique on the pain, behavior and anxiety levels during administration of inferior alveolar nerve block. |
Children will be divided into 3 groups namely active distraction which is stress ball, passive distraction which is Virtual reality glasses, and conventional behavior guidance method which is positive reinforcement and euphemisms during the administration of inferior alveolar nerve block. |
| Intervention |
To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of stress ball(active) distraction technique and audiovisual distraction (passive) technique and conventional behavior guidance technique on the pain, behavior and anxiety levels during administration of inferior alveolar nerve block. |
Group 1: active distraction using stress ball technique |
| Intervention |
To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of stress ball(active) distraction technique and audiovisual distraction (passive) technique and conventional behavior guidance technique on the pain, behavior and anxiety levels during administration of inferior alveolar nerve block. |
Group 2: Passive distraction technique using Virtual reality glasses |
| Intervention |
To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of stress ball(active) distraction technique and audiovisual distraction (passive) technique and conventional behavior guidance technique on the pain, behavior and anxiety levels during administration of inferior alveolar nerve block. |
Group 3 : Conventional technique using euphemisms and positive reinforcement |
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
8.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
12.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Both |
| Details |
1. Children with a score of ≥12 on faces version of Modified Child Dental Anxiety Scale.
2. Children who could be categorized under positive (+) ratings of Wright’s modification of Frankl behavior rating scale (Wright and Stigers 2011).
3. Children who require extraction/pulp therapy/restoration for deep carious lesion treatment in lower primary and first permanent molars under local anesthesia (inferior alveolar nerve block).
|
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
1.Children suffering from any systemic and/or mental illness.
2.Children whose parents do not give written informed consent or children who do not give assent for the study
3.Children who have undergone any dental treatment under local anesthesia in the past 6-7 weeks.
|
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Random Number Table |
|
Method of Concealment
|
Sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Outcome Assessor Blinded |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| Dental anxiety of the child to be measured before and after the administration of Inferior alveolar nerve block using Modified Child Dental anxiety scale faces version [MCDAS(f)]. |
Before and after the administration of Inferior alveolar nerve block using Modified Child Dental anxiety scale faces version [MCDAS(f)]. |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| Behavior and pain of the child to be measured before and after the administration of Inferior alveolar nerve block using Venham Behaviour rating scale and Wong Baker and FLACC scale respectively. |
Before and after the administration of Inferior alveolar nerve block. |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="123" Sample Size from India="123"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "123"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="123" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
Phase 2/ Phase 3 |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
08/05/2019 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
26/02/2021 |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Date Missing |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="1" Months="0" Days="0" |
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
Modification(s)
|
Not Applicable |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Completed |
Publication Details
Modification(s)
|
NIL |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
Response - NO
|
Brief Summary
Modification(s)
|
Aim: To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of stress ball(active) distraction technique and audiovisual eyeglasses (passive) distraction technique on the pain, behavior and anxiety levels during administration of inferior alveolar nerve block. Objective: 1. To evaluate the change in the behavior, anxiety and pain levels in children after the use of the distraction techniques during the administration of inferior alveolar nerve block. 2. To compare the behavior, anxiety and pain levels between the children after use of active and passive distraction techniques during the administration of inferior alveolar nerve block. Methodology: All procedures were done in the presence of parents/guardians. In order to acclimatize the child to the dental clinic, basic behaviour guidance techniques like communication, tell-show-do, and verbal reinforcement were for all the participants. The children were randomly assigned to one of the groups using block randomization method with 1:1:1 allocation ratio: Group 1: Conventional method of Communication Group 2: Virtual Reality glasses Group 3: Stress ball Prior to administration of the local anesthetic agent, dental anxiety of the child was measured using the MCDAS(f) scale. Behavior was assessed during the entire length of the procedure using the Venham behavior scale. Each child was asked to quantify the pain felt during the injection using the Wong-Baker faces pain rating scale. The pain reaction was also recorded by an observer using FLACC scale ( Faces Legs Activity Cry and Consolability scale). The variations in the pulse rate was recorded using pulse oximeter, at three time points: just before starting the administration of the local anesthetic, during the injection of the local anesthetic and soon after the removal of the needle from the tissue. Scoring for behavior and pain was done using a video recording of the procedure by two examiners. A questionnaire consisting of questions on the history of earlier dental visit (first visit or not), past dental and medical experiences of the child, socioeconomic status, parental anxiety and temperament of the child was administered to the accompanying parent prior to the procedure. Results and Conclusions: There was no significant difference between the groups for all the outcomes (dental anxiety, behaviour and pain levels). Significant decrease in anxiety was seen within all the groups after the behaviour guidance. The effect of passive distraction (AV eyeglasses) and active distraction (stress ball) on the anxiety, behaviour and pain levels during administration of the inferior alveolar nerve block are comparable to the conventional behaviour guidance methods.
|