| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2019/04/018712 [Registered on: 24/04/2019] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
23/04/2019 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
Yes |
| Type of Trial |
PMS |
|
Type of Study
|
Physiotherapy (Not Including YOGA) |
| Study Design |
Other |
|
Public Title of Study
|
comparison between mfr and blr with plyometric training on hamstring |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
comparison between myofascial release and bent leg raise tehniquewith plyometric training on hamstring flexibility and fitness parameters in beginner runners- an experimental study |
| Trial Acronym |
|
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
Radhika Sabu |
| Designation |
2nd year postgraduate MPT |
| Affiliation |
MGM School of Physiotherapy |
| Address |
MGM Campos N-6 Cidco, Aurangabad.
MGM Campos N-6 cidco, aurangabad.
Aurangabad
MAHARASHTRA
431003
India |
| Phone |
8275676321 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
radhikasabu95@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person
Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Santosh Dobhal |
| Designation |
Assistant Professor |
| Affiliation |
MGM School of Physiotherapy |
| Address |
MGM Campos N-6 Cidco, Aurangabad
MGM Campos N-6 cidco, aurangabad.
Aurangabad
MAHARASHTRA
431003
India |
| Phone |
9923401079 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
ptsantosh07@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person
Public Query
|
| Name |
Radhika Sabu |
| Designation |
2nd year postgraduate MPT |
| Affiliation |
MGM School of Physiotherapy |
| Address |
MGM Campos N-6 cidco, aurangabad.
MGM Campos N-6 cidco, aurangabad.
Aurangabad
MAHARASHTRA
431003
India |
| Phone |
8275676321 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
radhikasabu95@gmail.com |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
| MGM School of Physiotherapy, N-6 cidco Aurangabad. |
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
Radhika Sabu |
| Address |
MGM campos N-6 Cidco Aurangabad |
| Type of Sponsor |
Other [post graduate student] |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Radhika Sabu |
MGM SPORTS CLUB |
MGM Campus N-6 cidco, aurangabad.
Aurangabad
MAHARASHTRA |
8275676321
radhikasabu95@gmail.com |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| MGM-ECRHS |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Healthy Human Volunteers |
hamstring tightness |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Intervention |
group A (Experimental group) |
Self MFR was being given during pre and post plyometric training which involves applying sustained pressure on to Myofascial tissue restrictions. Subjects were asked to place hamstrings on the foam roller with hips unsupported. In which Legs were kept straight and asked to roll where the foam roller should slide from knee to hip while keeping quadriceps tightened. Procedure was repeated for 1-2 min on each side. Athletes were asked to keep the abdominal muscles tight to provide stability. |
| Comparator Agent |
group B(control group) |
• SBLR was being given during Pre and post plyometric training on second group of runners. Self BLR was taught to runners, in which the athlete places his one leg on the chair and other leg was flexed by 5-100 in which the athletes bends diagonally over the previous leg to get stretch on hamstring. And three repetitions of this technique for 30 sec hold were performed.
|
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
18.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
26.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Both |
| Details |
beginner runners, hamstring tightness |
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
1) All medical conditions that are contraindicated for strength training exercises as per American College of Sports Medicine guidelines.
2) Runners with lower extremity injuries.
3) Any lower extremity reconstructive surgery in the past 2 years.
4) Athletes who were taking and had previously taken growth hormone, or related performance endurance drugs.
5) Medical or orthopaedic problems that compromised their participation in this study.
|
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Coin toss, Lottery, toss of dice, shuffling cards etc |
|
Method of Concealment
|
An Open list of random numbers |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
|
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| flexibility,strength, endurance, agility |
2- before and after the study |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| gender distributions |
2- before and after the study |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="64"
Sample Size from India="64"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
Phase 1/ Phase 2 |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
29/04/2019 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="0"
Months="10"
Days="0" |
|
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
|
Not Applicable |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Not Yet Recruiting |
|
Publication Details
|
none yet |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
|
|
Brief Summary
|
Purpose: Purpose of this study was to examine the effect of hamstring flexibility and its parameter after self MFR and self BLR stretching on pre and post plyometric training session in beginner runners. Design: An Experimental study Objectives: To evaluate the effect of self MFR and self BLR stretching with plyometric training, on hamstring stiffness, endurance, strength and agility. Method: Sixty- four subjects aged between (18-25) were included in this study. Athletes were selected on the basis of inclusion criteria and they were divided randomly in to two groups, the Experimental group received self MFR for 6 weeks, per week three sessions along with plyometric training. And the Control group received self BLR for 6 weeks, per week 3 sessions. The outcome measures were rate of perceived exertion scale, Active knee extension test, agility T test, leg press test. Result: Paired t test and unpaired t test was used to analyse the data. It was found that there was no significant difference between pre and post hamstring stiffness, endurance, agility and strength in group A and group B. but group A was found more significant than group B. Conclusion: This study concluded that self Myofascial Release technique with plyometric training is better than self-Bent Leg Raise technique with plyometric training in beginner runners Key words: MFR, BLR, Plyometric training, Hamstring stiffness, Agility, Strength, Endurance. |