FULL DETAILS (Read-only)  -> Click Here to Create PDF for Current Dataset of Trial
CTRI Number  CTRI/2019/03/018122 [Registered on: 15/03/2019] Trial Registered Prospectively
Last Modified On: 13/03/2019
Post Graduate Thesis  Yes 
Type of Trial  Observational 
Type of Study   Comparative 
Study Design  Other 
Public Title of Study   To compare the height between thyroid cartilage and chin, and the ratio of two distances i.e. the distance between the hyoid bone and the chin in extended and neutal neck positions for predicting difficult intubation in adults who have to be electively operated under general anaesthesia. 
Scientific Title of Study   Comparison of thyromental height and sonographic hyomental distance ratio in predicting difficult intubation in adults undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia. 
Trial Acronym   
Secondary IDs if Any  
Secondary ID  Identifier 
NIL  NIL 
 
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)  
Name  Parul Sood 
Designation  PGJR Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, GMCH 32 Chandigarh 
Affiliation  Government Medical College and Hospital Sector 32 Chandigarh 
Address  Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Government Medical College and Hospital, sector 32 Chandigarh
House no. 485 top floor sector 15 A Chandigarh
Chandigarh
CHANDIGARH
160030
India 
Phone  9815105081  
Fax    
Email  parulsood77@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Scientific Query
 
Name  Richa Saroa 
Designation  Associate Professor 
Affiliation  Government Medical College and Hospital Sector 32 Chandigarh 
Address  Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Government Medical College and Hospital, sector 32 Chandigarh
House no. 485 top floor sector 15 A Chandigarh
Chandigarh
CHANDIGARH
160030
India 
Phone  9646121513  
Fax    
Email  richajayant@rediffmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Public Query
 
Name  Richa Saroa 
Designation  Associate Professor 
Affiliation  Government Medical College and Hospital Sector 32 Chandigarh 
Address  Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Government Medical College and Hospital, sector 32 Chandigarh

Chandigarh
CHANDIGARH
160030
India 
Phone  9646121513  
Fax    
Email  richajayant@rediffmail.com  
 
Source of Monetary or Material Support  
Government Medical College and Hospital Sector 32 Chandigarh 
 
Primary Sponsor  
Name  Government Medical College and Hospital Sector Chandigarh 
Address  Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Government Medical College and Hospital, sector 32 Chandigarh 
Type of Sponsor  Government medical college 
 
Details of Secondary Sponsor  
Name  Address 
NIL  NIL 
 
Countries of Recruitment     India  
Sites of Study  
No of Sites = 1  
Name of Principal Investigator  Name of Site  Site Address  Phone/Fax/Email 
Parul Sood  Government Medical College and Hospital, sector 32 Chandigarh  Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Government Medical College and Hospital, sector 32 Chandigarh
Chandigarh
CHANDIGARH 
9815105081

parulsood77@gmail.com 
 
Details of Ethics Committee  
No of Ethics Committees= 1  
Name of Committee  Approval Status 
INSTITUTIONAL ETHICS COMMITTEE (GMCH Chandigarh)  Approved 
 
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI  
Status 
Not Applicable 
 
Health Condition / Problems Studied  
Health Type  Condition 
Patients  (1) ICD-10 Condition: O||Medical and Surgical, (2) ICD-10 Condition: O||Medical and Surgical,  
 
Intervention / Comparator Agent  
Type  Name  Details 
 
Inclusion Criteria  
Age From  18.00 Year(s)
Age To  75.00 Year(s)
Gender  Both 
Details  1.Patients scheduled to undergo elective surgical procedures under general anaesthesia followed by endotracheal intubation.
2.American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status â…  or â…¡.
 
 
ExclusionCriteria 
Details  1.Patient refusal.
2.Patients undergoing emergency lifesaving procedures.
3.Pregnant patients.
4.Bearded men.
5.Patients with maxillofacial injuries or deformities.
6.Patients with anatomical abnormalities altering the airway.
7.Patients with neuromuscular disorders and cervical spine injuries.
8.Patients with BMI > 35kg/m2  
 
Method of Generating Random Sequence   Not Applicable 
Method of Concealment   Not Applicable 
Blinding/Masking   Outcome Assessor Blinded 
Primary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
To compare thyromental height (TMH) and sonographic hyomental distance ratio (HMDR) in predicting difficult endotracheal intubation in adults undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia.   Thyromental height and Sonographic hyomental distance ratio will be measured preoperatively. Intraoperatively, Cormack Lehane grading and Percentage of glottic opening scoring will be done. 
 
Secondary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
To compare these two tests viz thyromental height and sonographic hyomental distance ratio with other established tests of airway assessment viz: modified Mallampatti test (MMT), thyromental distance (TMD) and sternomental distance (SMD).   The established tests of airway assessment viz: modified Mallampatti test (MMT), thyromental distance (TMD) and sternomental distance (SMD) will be assessed in the preoperative setting.
 
 
Target Sample Size   Total Sample Size="400"
Sample Size from India="400" 
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" 
Phase of Trial   N/A 
Date of First Enrollment (India)   30/03/2019 
Date of Study Completion (India) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Date of First Enrollment (Global)  Date Missing 
Date of Study Completion (Global) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Estimated Duration of Trial   Years="2"
Months="0"
Days="0" 
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)   Not Applicable 
Recruitment Status of Trial (India)  Not Yet Recruiting 
Publication Details   None yet 
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement

Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?  

Brief Summary    Being competent in airway management is an indispensable skill for every anaesthesiologist. Inability to deal with it exposes a patient to the risk of injury and death. Difficult airway is defined as a clinical situation in which a conventionally trained anaesthesiologist experiences difficulty with ventilation of the upper airway with bag and mask or endotracheal intubation or both. The search for predictors of a difficult airway has been ongoing since the very first intubation was performed. Many morphological parameters have been suggested for the same. These include the modified Mallampatti test (MMT), upper lip bite test (ULBT), inter incisor gap (IIG), degree of neck movement, sternomental distance (SMD) and thyromental distance (TMD). These conventional tests are simple, take minimum time, are comfortable for the patient, reproducible and can be measured manually without the need of any equipment. In spite of these benefits, none of these tests, when used individually, is conclusive on its own. So, the anaesthesiologist has to perform all these tests to get a better prediction rate for the presence of a difficult airway. Thyromental height (TMH) and sonographic hyomental distance ratio (HMDR) are both newly proposed tests for predicting a difficult airway. Thyromental height is the height between the anterior border of the thyroid cartilage and the anterior border of mentum. It is measured with the patient lying supine with his/her mouth closed. A cut off value of 5 cm has been considered as a good correlative predictor of difficult airway. Hyomental distance ratio (HMDR) is the ratio of the hyomental distance (the distance between the hyoid bone and the tip of the chin) at the extreme of head extension (HMDe) and in the neutral position (HMDn). Cut off value of sonographic hyomental distance ratio of 1.2 has been shown to predict a difficult airway.There is limited research on the above said parameters i.e thyromental height and sonographic hyomental distance ratio in comparison to each other so as to predict difficult airway in patients scheduled to undergo general anaesthesia. Therefore, the present study aims to compare these two tests amongst themselves as well as with the conventional tests like MMT, TMD and SMD to determine the method of airway assessment that has the highest sensitivity and specificity.  
 
 
Close