FULL DETAILS (Read-only)  -> Click Here to Create PDF for Current Dataset of Trial
CTRI Number  CTRI/2018/05/013680 [Registered on: 04/05/2018] Trial Registered Prospectively
Last Modified On: 16/01/2020
Post Graduate Thesis  Yes 
Type of Trial  Interventional 
Type of Study   Drug
Surgical/Anesthesia 
Study Design  Non-randomized, Active Controlled Trial 
Public Title of Study   A comparative study between two lower limb nerve blocks in post operative bilateral total knee replacement patients. 
Scientific Title of Study   Effect of Adductor canal block versus Femoral nerve block for post operative pain after total knee arthroplasty:A non randomised comparative study 
Trial Acronym   
Secondary IDs if Any  
Secondary ID  Identifier 
NIL  NIL 
 
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)  
Name  Dr Nishith Govil 
Designation  Associate professor  
Affiliation  All India institute of Medical sciences,rishikesh 
Address  Department of anaesthesiology,AIIMS,Rishikesh
Dehradun
Dehradun
UTTARANCHAL
249204
India 
Phone  8126101759  
Fax    
Email  nishithgovil@rediffmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Scientific Query
 
Name  Dr Nishith Govil 
Designation  Associate professor  
Affiliation  All India institute of Medical sciences,rishikesh 
Address  Department of anaesthesiology,AIIMS,Rishikesh
Dehradun
Dehradun
UTTARANCHAL
249204
India 
Phone  8126101759  
Fax    
Email  nishithgovil@rediffmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Public Query
 
Name  Dr Nishith Govil 
Designation  Associate professor  
Affiliation  All India institute of Medical sciences,rishikesh 
Address  Department of anaesthesiology,AIIMS,Rishikesh
Dehradun
Dehradun
UTTARANCHAL
249204
India 
Phone  8126101759  
Fax    
Email  nishithgovil@rediffmail.com  
 
Source of Monetary or Material Support  
All India Institute of Medical sciences.(A.I.I.M.S) Virbhadra Road, Rishikesh -249201,Dehradun (Uttarakhand) 
 
Primary Sponsor  
Name  Department of Anaesthesiology  
Address  Department of Anaesthesiology,A.I.I.M.S, Rishikesh,Dehradun (Uttarakhand) 
Type of Sponsor  Government medical college 
 
Details of Secondary Sponsor  
Name  Address 
NIL  NIL 
 
Countries of Recruitment     India  
Sites of Study  
No of Sites = 1  
Name of Principal Investigator  Name of Site  Site Address  Phone/Fax/Email 
Dr Vamshi Krishna   All India Institute of Medical sciences (A.I.I.M.S)  Department of Anaesthesiology,Virbhadra road,Rishikesh
Dehradun
UTTARANCHAL 
8951511186

1141vamkri@gmail.com 
 
Details of Ethics Committee  
No of Ethics Committees= 1  
Name of Committee  Approval Status 
Institutional Ethics committee,AIIMS,Rishikesh   Approved 
 
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI  
Status 
Not Applicable 
 
Health Condition / Problems Studied
Modification(s)  
Health Type  Condition 
Patients  ASA I,II AND III, (1) ICD-10 Condition: M170||Bilateral primary osteoarthritis of knee,  
 
Intervention / Comparator Agent
Modification(s)  
Type  Name  Details 
Intervention  Adductor canal block   Adductor canal block is a relatively new technique where sensory innervation of the knee [saphenous nerve, articular branch from vastus medialis and obturator nerve] is blocked and the block is given distal to most efferent branches to the quadriceps muscle and this helps in preservation of motor strength of this muscle.And the USG guided adductor canal block is given in either of the limb. 
Comparator Agent  femoral nerve block  Femoral nerve block causes motor involvement in addition to the desired sensory blockade, which causes Quadriceps muscle weakness leading to delayed mobilization and increased incidence of fall in the post-operative period.And the USG guided femoral nerve block is give in either of limb. 
 
Inclusion Criteria  
Age From  50.00 Year(s)
Age To  80.00 Year(s)
Gender  Both 
Details  1. Age more than 50 years of either sex
2. ASA- I, II and III
3. Patients undergoing primary Bilateral total knee arthroplasty
 
 
ExclusionCriteria 
Details  1] Associated coagulation disorders
2] Severe cardiac, renal or hepatic dysfunction
3] Allergy to TEST drug
4] Any pre-existing sensory or motor impairment
5] Patient refusal/chronic pain medications
6] Patient with cognitive impairment
7] Patient unable to understand study protocol and VAS scoring
 
 
Method of Generating Random Sequence   Not Applicable 
Method of Concealment   Pre-numbered or coded identical Containers 
Blinding/Masking   Participant and Investigator Blinded 
Primary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
To assess the post-operative analgesia of adductor canal block and femoral nerve block in bilateral total knee arthroplasty with Visual Analog Scale.  within 48hrs of post operative period  
 
Secondary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
1. To assess the degree of quadriceps muscle weakness in post total knee arthroplasty in both methods.
2. To assess the degree of knee flexion in post total knee arthroplasty in both methods.
3. To compare complications if any, in either method.

 
With in 48hrs of post operative period

 
 
Target Sample Size   Total Sample Size="50"
Sample Size from India="50" 
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" 
Phase of Trial   Phase 2 
Date of First Enrollment (India)   15/05/2018 
Date of Study Completion (India) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Date of First Enrollment (Global)  Date Missing 
Date of Study Completion (Global) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Estimated Duration of Trial   Years="1"
Months="0"
Days="0" 
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
Modification(s)  
Not Applicable 
Recruitment Status of Trial (India)  Not Yet Recruiting 
Publication Details   None yet 
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement

Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?  

Brief Summary  

In this study, we will compare Adductor canal block with femoral nerve block for postoperative analgesia, motor weakness of the quadriceps muscle and degree of knee flexion in patients undergoing primary bilateral total knee arthroplasty[TKA]. Only a few number of studies have compared the ACB approach with FNB approach in a clinical setting involving TKA patients. Since pain perception and pain threshold varies from individual to individual, a significant interpatient variability exists, which can lead to bias. In order to overcome this bias we will be using a method that would allow us to compare both these nerve blocks in the same individual, by enrolling patients undergoing the same surgical procedure in both the lower limbs, such as bilateral TKA.

We hypothesised that Adductor canal block [ACB] would provide analgesia non-inferior to femoral nerve block[FNB] as assessed by Visual analogue scale and ACB would be associated with less quadriceps motor weakness than FNB.

 


 
Close