FULL DETAILS (Read-only)  -> Click Here to Create PDF for Current Dataset of Trial
CTRI Number  CTRI/2018/04/013458 [Registered on: 24/04/2018] Trial Registered Retrospectively
Last Modified On: 23/04/2018
Post Graduate Thesis  Yes 
Type of Trial  Interventional 
Type of Study   Surgical/Anesthesia 
Study Design  Randomized, Parallel Group Trial 
Public Title of Study   comparison between two video laryngoscope 
Scientific Title of Study   A Comparative Evaluation Of King Vision Videolaryngoscope and Airtraq Optical Laryngoscope as Intubating Device in Adult Patients Undergoing Elective General Surgery 
Trial Acronym  Airway 
Secondary IDs if Any  
Secondary ID  Identifier 
NIL  NIL 
 
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)  
Name  Amrin Bader 
Designation  Senior Resident 
Affiliation  Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College AMU Aligarh 
Address  Department of Anaesthesiology and critical care Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College AMU,Aligarh

Aligarh
UTTAR PRADESH
202002
India 
Phone  9997759190  
Fax    
Email  amrinbadar@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Scientific Query
 
Name  Syed Hussain Amir 
Designation  Assistant Professor 
Affiliation  Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College AMU Aligarh 
Address  Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College AMU,Aligarh

Aligarh
UTTAR PRADESH
202002
India 
Phone  8218496722  
Fax    
Email  hussainamir77@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Public Query
 
Name  Amrin Bader 
Designation  Senior Resident 
Affiliation  Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College AMU Aligarh 
Address  Department of Anaesthesiology and critical care Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College AMU,Aligarh

Aligarh
UTTAR PRADESH
202002
India 
Phone  9997759190  
Fax    
Email  amrinbadar@gmail.com  
 
Source of Monetary or Material Support  
Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College AMU, Aligarh 
 
Primary Sponsor  
Name  Department of Anaesthesiology 
Address  Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh 
Type of Sponsor  Government medical college 
 
Details of Secondary Sponsor  
Name  Address 
Qazi Ehsan Ali  Professor Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh  
 
Countries of Recruitment     India  
Sites of Study  
No of Sites = 1  
Name of Principal Investigator  Name of Site  Site Address  Phone/Fax/Email 
Amrin Bader  Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College AMU Aligarh  Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College Aligarh Muslim University Aligarh UTTAR PRADESH
Aligarh
UTTAR PRADESH 
9997759190

amrinbadar@gmail.com 
 
Details of Ethics Committee  
No of Ethics Committees= 1  
Name of Committee  Approval Status 
Institutional Ethics Committee, Faculty of Medicine, AMU   Approved 
 
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI  
Status 
Not Applicable 
 
Health Condition / Problems Studied  
Health Type  Condition 
Patients  ASA Physical Status I and II ,  
 
Intervention / Comparator Agent  
Type  Name  Details 
Comparator Agent  Airtraq optical video laryngoscope  Intubation time comparison and hemodynamics 
Intervention  King Vision Video laryngoscope and Airtraq Video laryngoscope   Intubation Time comparison and Hemodynamics 
 
Inclusion Criteria  
Age From  20.00 Year(s)
Age To  60.00 Year(s)
Gender  Both 
Details  ASA Grade I and II
Weight between 45-70 Kg
Patients planned for Elective Surgery  
 
ExclusionCriteria 
Details  Previous history of multiple/ failed intubation.
Head and neck surgery.
Valvular heart disease.
CAD / Uncontrolled hypertension.
Presence of raised intracranial pressure.
Cervical spine injury.
Predicted difficult laryngoscopy except for all class of MP Grades
Any pathology of the oral cavity that will obstruct the insertion of device.
Mouth opening <2.5cm.
Potentially full stomach patients (trauma, morbid obesity, pregnancy, history of gastric regurgitation and heart burn) and at risk of esophageal reflux (hiatus hernia). 
 
Method of Generating Random Sequence   Computer generated randomization 
Method of Concealment   On-site computer system 
Blinding/Masking   Participant Blinded 
Primary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
To compare the intubation time using the two devices.
 
2 years 
 
Secondary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
To compare success rate at first attempt
To compare the glottic view using Cormack and Lehane Grading.
To compare the hemodynamic response i.e., heart rate and mean arterial B.P. after laryngoscopy and intubation.
To Grade the ease of tracheal intubation using these devices.
To compare the number of adjustment maneuvers required for successful intubation.
To look for complications like post-extubation blood staining on endotracheal tube and incidence of postoperative sore throat 
2yrs 
 
Target Sample Size   Total Sample Size="54"
Sample Size from India="54" 
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "60"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="60" 
Phase of Trial   N/A 
Date of First Enrollment (India)   01/03/2015 
Date of Study Completion (India) 29/10/2016 
Date of First Enrollment (Global)  Date Missing 
Date of Study Completion (Global) Date Missing 
Estimated Duration of Trial   Years="2"
Months="0"
Days="0" 
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)   Not Applicable 
Recruitment Status of Trial (India)  Completed 
Publication Details   none yet 
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement

Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?  

Brief Summary   The study entitled "A Comparative Evaluation Of King Vision Videolaryngoscope And Airtraq Optical Laryngoscope As Intubating Device In Adult Patients Undergoing Elective General Surgery" was conducted on 60 ASA I and II patients of either sex aged between 20-60 years and in the weight range of 45 to 70 kg after obtaining informed consent. We compared the two video laryngoscope in terms of intubation time and hemodynamic response i.e., heart rate and Mean arterial Blood Pressure (MAP) after  laryngoscopy and intubation. This was a single blinded Randomised parallel comparative study evaluating the characteristics of the two devices and its usefulness in clinical practice.
Results favours that King Vision video laryngoscope better than Airtraq optical video laryngoscope
 
Close