FULL DETAILS (Read-only)  -> Click Here to Create PDF for Current Dataset of Trial
CTRI Number  CTRI/2018/04/013124 [Registered on: 09/04/2018] Trial Registered Retrospectively
Last Modified On: 04/12/2019
Post Graduate Thesis  Yes 
Type of Trial  Interventional 
Type of Study   Drug
Surgical/Anesthesia 
Study Design  Randomized, Parallel Group Trial 
Public Title of Study   Postoperative pain management in breast cancer surgery 
Scientific Title of Study   Comparison of effects of intraoperative infusion of low dose ketamine versus lignocaine in post operative pain management in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery. 
Trial Acronym   
Secondary IDs if Any  
Secondary ID  Identifier 
NIL  NIL 
 
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)  
Name  Dr Midhun Baby 
Designation  junior resident 
Affiliation  Govt medical college-Kozhikode 
Address  Dept of Anaesthesia, Govt medical college-Kozhikode kerala
Thenasseril house Chettapalam PO Pulpally, Wayanad
Kozhikode
KERALA
673008
India 
Phone  9400640729  
Fax    
Email  midhun.ann89@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Scientific Query
 
Name  Dr Suvarna K 
Designation  Additional professor of Anaesthesia 
Affiliation  Govt medical college- Kozhikode 
Address  Dept of Anaesthesia, Govt medical college-Kozhikode, Kerala, India
Kaniyil house, kaviyoor, Chokli. P.O kannur district kerala
Kozhikode
KERALA
673008
India 
Phone  9447638221  
Fax    
Email  suvarnakaniyil@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Public Query
 
Name  Dr Suvarna K 
Designation  Additional professor of Anaesthesia 
Affiliation  Govt medical college- Kozhikode 
Address  Dept of Anaesthesia, Govt medical college-Kozhikode, Kerala, India
Kaniyil house, kaviyoor, Chokli. P.O kannur district kerala
Kozhikode
KERALA
673008
India 
Phone  9447638221  
Fax    
Email  suvarnakaniyil@gmail.com  
 
Source of Monetary or Material Support  
Dept of Anaesthesia, Govt medical college-Kozhikode 
 
Primary Sponsor  
Name  Govt medical collegeKozhikode 
Address  Dept of Anaesthesia, Govt medical college-Kozhikode kerala 
Type of Sponsor  Government medical college 
 
Details of Secondary Sponsor  
Name  Address 
NIL  NIL 
 
Countries of Recruitment     India  
Sites of Study  
No of Sites = 1  
Name of Principal Investigator  Name of Site  Site Address  Phone/Fax/Email 
Dr Midhun Baby  Govt medical college-Kozhikode, Kerala  Dept of Anaesthesia- Major operation theatre comlex, Govt medical college-Kozhikode, Kerala
Kozhikode
KERALA 
9400640729

midhun.ann89@gmail.com 
 
Details of Ethics Committee  
No of Ethics Committees= 1  
Name of Committee  Approval Status 
Institutional ethics committee, Govt medical college-Kozhikode  Approved 
 
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI  
Status 
Not Applicable 
 
Health Condition / Problems Studied
Modification(s)  
Health Type  Condition 
Patients  (1) ICD-10 Condition: C509||Malignant neoplasm of breast of unspecified site, patients with carcinoma breast sheduled for modified radical mastectomy who comes under American society of Anaesthesiologists physical status I and II,  
 
Intervention / Comparator Agent  
Type  Name  Details 
Comparator Agent  Ketamine group  After general anaesthesia induction and intubation the study drugs are given before skin incision. In Ketamine group injection ketamine 0.2mg/kg bolus given intravenously before skin incision and followed by infusion of 0.2mg/kg/hr till the end of the surgery 
Intervention  Lignocaine infusion  patients with carcinoma breast sheduled for elective modified radical mastectomy were randomly divided into two groups of 25 each. After general anaesthesia induction and intubation the study drugs are given before skin incision. The Lignocaine group received intravenous bolus dose of 2mg/kg preservative free Lignocaine followed by infusion at a rate of 2mg/kg/hr till the end of the surgery.  
 
Inclusion Criteria  
Age From  30.00 Year(s)
Age To  65.00 Year(s)
Gender  Female 
Details  1.Female carcinoma breast sheduled for modified radical mastectomy
2. Age 30-65 yrs
3. American society of physical status I and II
3. weight 40-70kg
 
 
ExclusionCriteria 
Details  1. patients with chronic pain /on chronic analgesics or opioid
2. Patient refusal
3. Drug allergy
4. pregnancy
 
 
Method of Generating Random Sequence   Computer generated randomization 
Method of Concealment   Sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes 
Blinding/Masking   Participant, Investigator and Outcome Assessor Blinded 
Primary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
1. Duration of postoperative analgesia
2. Total analgesic consumption in first 24 hours 
1. Duration of postoperative analgesia from end of surgical closure of wound
2. Total analgesic consumption in first 24 hours 
 
Secondary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
1. sedation score after extubation
2. Chronic post surgical pain persisting after 3 months
 
1. sedation score is noted just after extubation and 30 minutes after extubation
2. Chronic pain is assessed 3months after surgery . 
 
Target Sample Size   Total Sample Size="60"
Sample Size from India="60" 
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "60"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="60" 
Phase of Trial   N/A 
Date of First Enrollment (India)   02/01/2017 
Date of Study Completion (India) 12/10/2017 
Date of First Enrollment (Global)  Date Missing 
Date of Study Completion (Global) Date Missing 
Estimated Duration of Trial   Years="0"
Months="8"
Days="0" 
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)   Not Applicable 
Recruitment Status of Trial (India)  Completed 
Publication Details   1.60. Grigoras A, Lee P, Sattar F, Shorten G. Perioperative intravenous lidocaine decreases the incidence of persistent pain after breast surgery. Clin J Pain. 2012 Sep 1;28(7):567-72. 2. 66. Behdad A, Hosseinpour M, Khorasani P. Preemptive use of ketamine on post operative pain of appendectomy. Korean JPain. 2011 Sep 1;24(3):137-40. 3. 68. Jendoubi A, Naceur IB, Bouzouita A, Trifa M, Ghedira S, Chebil M, Houissa M. A comparison between intravenous lidocaine and ketamine on acute and chronic pain after open nephrectomy: A prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Saudi J Anaesth. 2017 Apr;11(2):177. 4. 72. Mahran E, Hassan ME. Comparison of pregabalin versus ketamine in postoperative pain management in breast cancer surgery. Saudi J Anaesth. 2015 Jul;9(3):253.  
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement

Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?  

Brief Summary  

Breast cancer surgery is a common surgery with many of the patients experiencing moderate to severe pain, both acute and chronic postsurgical pain in the postoperative period. One of the modalities for management of postsurgical pain in breast cancer surgery is opioids but increasing no of recent reports regarding early reccurence of ma;ignancy with opioid usage is alarming. Opioids are also associated with several adverse effects such as itching, postoperative nausea and vomiting, respiratory depression, etc. Concerns about opioid risk in the postoperative period has aroused an increased interest in the use of non-opioid analgesic adjuvants. Intravenous lignocaine and low dose ketamine infusions have individually shown to reduce the opioid consumption and to improve the overall postoperative outcomes in several studies. There is a paucity of literature comparing the efficacy of these two drugs. So, we did this study to compare the efficacy and duration of analgesia  and development of chronic pain with use of intravenous lignocaine and low dose ketamine in breast cancer surgery. This will help us find out a superior technique with effective analgesia that will be very helpful to control pain and prevent its complication in many of the patients undergoing breast surgery.

Study was conducted on 60 patients undergoing mastectomy after getting approval from Ethical committee and consent. Patients were randomised to two groups of 30 each. Preoperatively, all patients were instructed regarding how to read the Numerical Rating Scale used for assessing the pain in the postoperative period. Premedication was with oral ranitidine 150 mg and metoclopramide 10 mg on the previous night of surgery and on the morning of surgery.

On arrival to the operation theatre, standard monitors were attached and baseline parameters were recorded. Each patient received iv glycopyrrolate 10 mcg/kg, iv ondansetron 0.1 mg/kg, iv midazolam 0.01mg/kg and iv fentanyl 2 mcg/kg. After pre-oxygenation for three minutes, patients were induced with Inj. Propofol 2mg/kg. Endotracheal intubation with appropriate sized, cuffed endotracheal tube was facilitated with Inj. Succinylcholine 1.5 mg/kg. Anesthesia was maintained with nitrous oxide, oxygen and Isoflurane and Inj. Vecuronium bromide 0.1 mg/kg bolus for muscle relaxation. Additional doses of vecuronium were given as deemed necessary by the attending anesthesiologist.

Group K received an intravenous bolus of ketamine 0.2 mg/kg before skin incision followed by 0.2 mg/kg/hour until the end of the procedureand group L received an intravenous bolus dose of preservative free 2% lignocaine 2 mg/kg before skin incision followed by 2 mg/kg/hour till the end of the procedure. Intra-operatively, patient’s vital signs were recorded periodically and patients having fluctuations in HR and MAP >30% of baseline value were treated accordingly. After the completion of the procedure, all infusions were stopped and the patient reversed with  Neostigmine  and  Glycopyrrolate and extubated. The time for extubation and the time for response to oral commands were recorded.

After the procedure, patients were monitored in the recovery room and in the post-operative ward. Any perioperative complications such as tachycardia, bradycardia, hypertension, hypotension, nausea, vomiting, muscle twitching, seizures, respiratory depression were watched for. Numerical Rating Scale  for pain were assessed serially at 10 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 4 hours, 12 hours and 24 hours after surgery. Inj. Paracetamol 1 gram iv and inj. Tramadol 50 mg iv were given as the first line and second line rescue analgesics respectively and were administered if NRS ≥ 4. The time for first analgesic request was recorded. The duration of analgesia was taken as the time at which patient complained of pain or the NRS was ≥ 4 on assessment at serial intervals. The total dose of rescue analgesics needed in the first 24 hours were also recorded. Postoperatively, sedation was assessed soon after extubation and after 30 minutes by using modified Ramsay sedation score. Development of chronic postsurgical pain was assessed by telephonic enquiry of all patients after 3 months of surgery.

 
Close