FULL DETAILS (Read-only)  -> Click Here to Create PDF for Current Dataset of Trial
CTRI Number  CTRI/2018/01/011332 [Registered on: 15/01/2018] Trial Registered Retrospectively
Last Modified On: 13/01/2018
Post Graduate Thesis  Yes 
Type of Trial  Interventional 
Type of Study   Surgical/Anesthesia 
Study Design  Randomized, Parallel Group Trial 
Public Title of Study   Comparison of two intraocular lenses for correction of cylinder power 
Scientific Title of Study   Comparative evaluation of two different Toric Intraocular Lenses for correcting astigmatism in patients undergoing phacoemulsification 
Trial Acronym   
Secondary IDs if Any  
Secondary ID  Identifier 
GMC/TA-I/(19-D)/2014/43647  Protocol Number 
 
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)  
Name  Sheetal Aatrai 
Designation  MS Ophthalmology 
Affiliation  Government Medical College and Hospital Chandigarh 
Address  Department of Ophthalmology, level 3
Government Medical College and Hospital, Sector 32, Chandigarh
Chandigarh
CHANDIGARH
160030
India 
Phone  08872971715  
Fax    
Email  ssheital@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Scientific Query
 
Name  Rakesh Kumar Bansal 
Designation  Associate Professor 
Affiliation  Government Medical College and Hospital Chandigarh 
Address  Department of Ophthalmology
Government Medical College and Hospital, Sector 32 Chandigarh
Chandigarh
CHANDIGARH
160030
India 
Phone  9646121589  
Fax    
Email  bansalrk@hotmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Public Query
 
Name  Rakesh Kumar Bansal 
Designation  Associate Professor 
Affiliation  Government Medical College and Hospital Chandigarh 
Address  Department of Ophthalmology
Government Medical College and Hospital, Sector 32 Chandigarh
Chandigarh
CHANDIGARH
160030
India 
Phone  9646121589  
Fax    
Email  bansalrk@hotmail.com  
 
Source of Monetary or Material Support  
Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh 
 
Primary Sponsor  
Name  Government Medical College and Hospital 
Address  Government Medical College and Hospital Sector 32 160030 Chandigarh 
Type of Sponsor  Government medical college 
 
Details of Secondary Sponsor  
Name  Address 
NIL  NIL 
 
Countries of Recruitment     India  
Sites of Study  
No of Sites = 1  
Name of Principal Investigator  Name of Site  Site Address  Phone/Fax/Email 
Rakesh Kumar Bansal  Government Medical College and Hospital  Department of Ophthalmology,level 3 Government Medical College and Hospital, Sector 32, Chandigarh
Chandigarh
CHANDIGARH 
9646121589

bansalrk@hotmail.com 
 
Details of Ethics Committee  
No of Ethics Committees= 1  
Name of Committee  Approval Status 
Institute Ethics Committee Government Medical College and Hospital Chandigarh  Approved 
 
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI  
Status 
Not Applicable 
 
Health Condition / Problems Studied  
Health Type  Condition 
Patients  Patients with cataract,  
 
Intervention / Comparator Agent  
Type  Name  Details 
Comparator Agent  Group 1  Patients implanted with plate haptic toric IOL (AT Torbi, Zeiss)  
Comparator Agent  Group 2  Patients implanted with loop haptic toric IOL (Acrysof) 
Intervention  Toric IOL implantation  The patients were implanted either plate haptic toric IOL (AT Torbi, Zeiss)(Group 1) or loop haptic toric IOL (Acrysof)(Group 2)  
 
Inclusion Criteria  
Age From  40.00 Year(s)
Age To  70.00 Year(s)
Gender  Both 
Details  Patients with cataract associated with preoperative regular corneal astigmatism between 1-5 D 
 
ExclusionCriteria 
Details  Patients with irregular astigmatism, corneal dystrophy, tear-film instability, pupillary abnormalities, glaucoma, uveitis, retinal diseases, optic atrophy, or neuro-ophthalmic disease were excluded. Patients developing intra-operative complications like posterior capsule rent or extension of capsulorhexis or zonular dialysis were also excluded. 
 
Method of Generating Random Sequence   Computer generated randomization 
Method of Concealment   Case Record Numbers 
Blinding/Masking   Open Label 
Primary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
Uncorrected visual acuity, Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), Keratometry, IOL position after full mydriasis by masked observer on slit lamp biomicroscope   Postoperatively at 1 week, 1 month and 3 months 
 
Secondary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
A note of complications such as persistent corneal edema, pupillary block, retinal detachment, endophthalmitis and/ or need for neodymium:YAG capsulotomy   Postoperatively at 1 week, 1 month and 3 months 
 
Target Sample Size   Total Sample Size="42"
Sample Size from India="42" 
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "42"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="42" 
Phase of Trial   N/A 
Date of First Enrollment (India)   01/01/2015 
Date of Study Completion (India) 06/07/2016 
Date of First Enrollment (Global)  Date Missing 
Date of Study Completion (Global) Date Missing 
Estimated Duration of Trial   Years="1"
Months="6"
Days="5" 
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)   Not Applicable 
Recruitment Status of Trial (India)  Completed 
Publication Details   Not yet published 
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement

Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?  

Brief Summary  

Purpose: To compare the efficacy of AT-TORBI plate haptic toric intraocular lens (IOL) (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany)  and AcrySof loop haptic toric intraocular lens (IOL) (Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX)  for correcting pre-existing astigmatism of ≥1dioptres (D) in patients undergoing phacoemulsification and to compare the rotational stability of these two toric IOLs.

Design: Prospective randomized controlled trial.

Methods : Forty two eyes of 42 cataract patients with preexisting astigmatism of 1D or more were randomized to receive plate haptic toric (AT TORBI) or loop haptic toric (AcrySof) IOL, with 21 in each group. Post-operative evaluation was done at day 1, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and IOL position were noted in both the groups.

Results : At three months post operatively, the mean log MAR UCVA was 0.2 in both the groups (p =0.7), the mean residual cylindrical refractive error in plate haptic toric group was 0.40 ± 0.31 D and in loop haptic group was  0.45 ± 0.33  D (p = 0.64). The mean IOL rotation at 3 months follow up in plate haptic group was found to be 3.52 ± 3.84° and in loop haptic group was 2.05 ± 2.56° (p = 0.25).

Conclusion: Both types of toric IOLs were equally efficacious for correcting uncorrected visual acuity and pre-existing astigmatism between 1-5 D. Both of them were rotationally stable at 3 months follow up.

 
Close