FULL DETAILS (Read-only)  -> Click Here to Create PDF for Current Dataset of Trial
CTRI Number  CTRI/2018/04/013409 [Registered on: 23/04/2018] Trial Registered Retrospectively
Last Modified On: 02/02/2021
Post Graduate Thesis  Yes 
Type of Trial  Observational 
Type of Study   Case Control Study 
Study Design  Randomized, Parallel Group, Active Controlled Trial 
Public Title of Study   we are comparing effect of etomidate,propofol and combination of propofol and ketamine on patients vitals at start of anaesthesia 
Scientific Title of Study   A comparison of propofol, etomidate and Ketofol means ketamine propofol 1:3 ratio as induction agent A Randomized comparative clinical study  
Trial Acronym   
Secondary IDs if Any  
Secondary ID  Identifier 
NIL  NIL 
 
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)  
Name  Meenakshi machhar 
Designation  junior resident 
Affiliation  RNT MEDICAL COLLEGE AND ATTACHED HOSPITAL,MAIN OT 
Address  RNT Medical college department of anaesthesiology udaipur Rajasthan
RNT Medical college department of anaesthesiology Udaipur Rajasthan
Udaipur
RAJASTHAN
313001
India 
Phone  9929760889  
Fax    
Email  meenakshimachhar25@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Scientific Query
 
Name  Khemraj Meena 
Designation  Professor 
Affiliation  RNT MEDICAL COLLEGE AND ATTACHED HOSPITAL,DEPARTMENT OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY 
Address  RNT Medical college department of anaesthesiology Udaipur Rajasthan
RNT Medical college department of anaesthesiology Udaipur Rajasthan
Udaipur
RAJASTHAN
313001
India 
Phone  9414759782  
Fax    
Email  khemraj10@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Public Query
 
Name  Meenakshi machhar 
Designation  junior resident 
Affiliation  RNT MEDICAL COLLEGE AND ATTACHED HOSPITAL,DEPARTMENT OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY 
Address  RNT Medical college department of anaesthesiology Udaipur Rajasthan
RNT Medical college department of anaesthesiology Udaipur Rajasthan
Udaipur
RAJASTHAN
313001
India 
Phone  9929760889  
Fax    
Email  meenakshimachhar25@gmail.com  
 
Source of Monetary or Material Support  
NA 
 
Primary Sponsor  
Name  Department of anaesthesiology 
Address  RNT Medical college and attached hospital udaipur rajasthan 
Type of Sponsor  Government medical college 
 
Details of Secondary Sponsor  
Name  Address 
NIL  NIL 
 
Countries of Recruitment     India  
Sites of Study  
No of Sites = 1  
Name of Principal Investigator  Name of Site  Site Address  Phone/Fax/Email 
Meenakshi machhar  MB governmentt hospital  RNT Medical college and attached hospital department of anaesthesia MAIN OT udaipur rajasthan rajasthan
Udaipur
RAJASTHAN 
9929760889

meenakshimachhar25@gmail.com 
 
Details of Ethics Committee  
No of Ethics Committees= 1  
Name of Committee  Approval Status 
Institutional Ethics Comittee RNT Medical College and controller and attached hospitals   Approved 
 
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI  
Status 
Not Applicable 
 
Health Condition / Problems Studied  
Health Type  Condition 
Patients  ASA grade I and II age 18-60yrs both male and female all elective general surgery,  
 
Intervention / Comparator Agent  
Type  Name  Details 
Intervention  comparison of propofol etomidate and Ketofol   propofol(2mg/kg)IV etomidate(0.3mg/kg)IV and ketamine(0.5mg/kg)+ propofol(1.5mg/kg)IV 1:3 ratio as induction agent given in 60 seconds studied haemodyanamics for 10 min after giving drugs. 
Comparator Agent  propofol etomidate ketofol  propofol(2mg/kg)IV etomidate(0.3mg/kg)IV and ketamine(0.5mg/kg)+ propofol(1.5mg/kg)IV 1:3 ratio as induction agent given in 60 seconds studied haemodyanamics for 10 min after giving drugs. 
 
Inclusion Criteria  
Age From  18.00 Year(s)
Age To  60.00 Year(s)
Gender  Both 
Details  American society of Anaesthesiologist grade I and II of either sex, weighing 35-70kg elected for general surgeries under general anaesthesia
 
 
ExclusionCriteria 
Details  Patients with history ofadrenal insufficiency, asthma,hypertension,suspected difficult airway,
receiving general anaesthesia during the previous week,receiving steroid during the past 6 months,sensitivity to etomidate, propofol or ketamine,sensitivity to egg and soya,pregnancy,
Morbidly obese,chronic inflammatory diseases and serious psychiatric,endocrine or neurological illnesses.
 
 
Method of Generating Random Sequence   Computer generated randomization 
Method of Concealment   Sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes 
Blinding/Masking   Participant, Investigator, Outcome Assessor and Date-entry Operator Blinded 
Primary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
comparision of haemodynamics in three groups  Haemodynamics were recorded baseline value,after induction,0 min after intubation,1 minute after intubation, 3 min after intubation, 5 min after intubation and 10 min after intubation
 
 
Secondary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
comparison of side effects and any adverse effects  any adverse effects of drug like pain on injection and myoclonus movement was seen during induction 
 
Target Sample Size   Total Sample Size="120"
Sample Size from India="120" 
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "120"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="120" 
Phase of Trial   N/A 
Date of First Enrollment (India)   16/12/2016 
Date of Study Completion (India) 17/12/2017 
Date of First Enrollment (Global)  Date Missing 
Date of Study Completion (Global) Date Missing 
Estimated Duration of Trial   Years="1"
Months="0"
Days="0" 
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)   Not Applicable 
Recruitment Status of Trial (India)  Completed 
Publication Details   None yet 
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement

Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?  

Brief Summary
Modification(s)  

comparing propofol,etomidate and ketofol as an induction agent and to compare haemodynamic changes during induction and intubation with etomidate, propofol and ketamine +propofol (ketofol) and to evaluate any adverse effects of study drugs.We Concluded that combination of ketamine plus propofol has better haemodynamic stability than etomidate and propofol as an induction agent with no side effects. Hence, combination proved to be significantly better than either propofol or etomidate alone

 
Close