| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2017/09/009729 [Registered on: 12/09/2017] Trial Registered Retrospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
08/09/2017 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
Yes |
| Type of Trial |
Observational |
|
Type of Study
|
Prospective Observational Study |
| Study Design |
Non-randomized, Multiple Arm Trial |
|
Public Title of Study
|
Comparison of effect of two methods of Alveolar Recruitment Maneuvers in improving oxygenation in patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
COMPARISON OF VOLUME CONTROL VERSUS PRESSURE CONTROL STEPWISE ALVEOLAR RECRUITMENT MANEUVER IN ACUTE RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME – A PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY |
| Trial Acronym |
|
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| IEC 320/2016 |
Protocol Number |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
Miss Ann Mary Jose |
| Designation |
BSc. Respiratory Therapist |
| Affiliation |
School of Allied Health Sciences, Manipal University |
| Address |
Department of Respiratory Therapy
School of Allied Health Sciences, Manipal University
Manipal, Udupi
Karnataka - 576104
Udupi KARNATAKA 576104 India |
| Phone |
8971749461 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
jann1891@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Mr Ramesh Unnikrishnan |
| Designation |
Assistant Professor |
| Affiliation |
School of Allied Health Sciences, Manipal University |
| Address |
Head of Department of Respiratory Therapy
SOAHS, Manipal University
Manipal, Udupi
Karnataka
Udupi KARNATAKA 576104 India |
| Phone |
9900404492 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
ramesh.unnikrishnan@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Mr Ramesh Unnikrishnan |
| Designation |
Assistant Professor |
| Affiliation |
School of Allied Health Sciences, Manipal University |
| Address |
Head of Department of Respiratory Therapy
SOAHS, Manipal University
Manipal, Udupi
Karnataka
Udupi KARNATAKA 576104 India |
| Phone |
9900404492 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
ramesh.unnikrishnan@gmail.com |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
| Kasturba Medical College and Hospital
Manipal, Udupi
Karnata 576104 |
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
KMC Hospital Manipal |
| Address |
KMC Hospital
Manipal University
Manipal
Udupi
Karnataka 576104 |
| Type of Sponsor |
Private medical college |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Miss Ann Mary Jose |
Kasturba Medical College and Hospital, Manipal |
Department of Respiratory Therapy
School of Allied Health Sciences, Manipal
Udupi
Karnataka 576104 Udupi KARNATAKA |
8971749461
jann1891@gmail.com |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| Kasturba Hospital Manipal, Institutional Ethics committee |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Patients |
ARDS patients, |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
18.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
80.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Both |
| Details |
All adult patients with moderate or severe stage of ARDS who requires invasive mechanical ventilation. |
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
1. Patients age < 18 years
2. Pregnant women
3. Neurosurgical patients
4. Thoracic surgery patients
5. Patients with bronchopulmonary fistula
6. Patients with chest trauma (including lung contusion, hemothorax, or pneumothorax)
History of severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (had bullae or blebs visible on chest radiograph)
7. Patients who are haemodynamically unstable.
Haemodynamic instability as defined by an increase in heart rate by more than 20 beats/minute from baseline, bradycardia < 50 beats per minute; drop in systolic blood pressure exceeding 20 mm Hg from the baseline.
Desaturation (decrease by > 5% SpO2) from baseline on pulse oximetry.
|
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Not Applicable |
|
Method of Concealment
|
Not Applicable |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Not Applicable |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| Compare the improvement in oxygenation (increase in PaO2/FiO2 post application of recruitment manoeuvre) with pressure control and volume control stepwise recruitment maneuvers in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. |
30 minutes after application of recruitment maneuver |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| Complications that can occur during application of RM compared among PCV – RM group and VCV – RM group |
COMPLICATIONS: WITHIN 1 HOUR
|
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="29" Sample Size from India="29"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "29"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="29" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
N/A |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
15/07/2016 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
31/01/2017 |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Date Missing |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="0" Months="8" Days="0" |
|
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
|
Not Applicable |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Completed |
|
Publication Details
|
nil |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
|
|
Brief Summary
|
In our study, an effort was made to elucidate the clinical impact of stepwise alveolar recruitment maneuvers (PC – RM and VC – RM)in patients with moderate to severe ARDS classified by Berlin’s. Our results suggest that there is no significant difference between the two modes of recruitment maneuvers in improving oxygenation, occurrence of complications, hospital days, ventilator days and survival rate. In total, 29 patients were enrolled over a period of 7 months and evaluated during recruitment maneuver. A total number of 16 (59%) subjects received PC – RM and 11 (41%) subjects received VC – RM. In the demographic and diagnostic variables age and the SOFA score was significantly different between PC – RM and VC – RM group.
The change in PaO2/FiO2 ratio from baseline to 30 minutes post recruitment showed statistically significant improvement in both the groups. In our study, post recruitment maneuver, no complications occurred. We find no difference in mortality between the 2 modes of recruitment. Possible factors that may explain this finding is that similar baseline characteristics such as severity of ARDS, and APACHE II score on the day of ICU admission.
|