CTRI Number |
CTRI/2017/12/010922 [Registered on: 20/12/2017] Trial Registered Retrospectively |
Last Modified On: |
20/11/2019 |
Post Graduate Thesis |
Yes |
Type of Trial |
Interventional |
Type of Study
|
Drug |
Study Design |
Randomized, Parallel Group Trial |
Public Title of Study
|
A clinical study to see the effects of two different drugs, in patients undergoing laser for angle closure glaucoma |
Scientific Title of Study
|
A Prospective, Randomized Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Topical 0.1% Nepafenac Eye Drops with Topical 1% Prednisolone Acetate Eye Drops in Primary Angle Closure Suspects Undergoing YAG Peripheral Iridotomy. |
Trial Acronym |
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
Secondary ID |
Identifier |
NIL |
NIL |
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
Name |
Dr Keerthi Gayam |
Designation |
DNB Resident |
Affiliation |
Aravind eye hospital |
Address |
Room no. 21, Deptartment of Glaucoma, Aravind eye hospital, Thavalakuppam,
Cuddalore main road,
Pondicherry
Pondicherry PONDICHERRY 605007 India |
Phone |
|
Fax |
|
Email |
keerthigayam16@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
Name |
Dr R Venkatesh |
Designation |
Cheif Medical Officer |
Affiliation |
Aravind eye hospital |
Address |
Room no.21, Department of Glaucoma, Aravind eye hospital, Thavalakuppam,
Cuddalore main road,
Pondicherry
Pondicherry PONDICHERRY 605007 India |
Phone |
|
Fax |
|
Email |
venkatesh@pondy.aravind.org |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
Name |
Dr Keerthi Gayam |
Designation |
DNB Resident |
Affiliation |
Aravind eye hospital |
Address |
Room no. 21, Department of Glaucoma, Aravind eye hospital, Thavalakuppam,
Cuddalore main road,
Pondicherry
Pondicherry PONDICHERRY 605007 India |
Phone |
|
Fax |
|
Email |
keerthigayam16@gmail.com |
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
Room no. 21, Department of Glaucoma, Aravind eye hospital, Thavalakuppam, Cuddalore main road, Pondicherry. |
|
Primary Sponsor
|
Name |
Aravind eye hospital |
Address |
Thavalakuppam, Cuddalore main road, Pondicherry. |
Type of Sponsor |
Research institution and hospital |
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
Sites of Study
|
No of Sites = 1 |
Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
Dr Keerthi Gayam |
Aravind eye hospital |
Room no. 8, Department of Glaucoma, Thavalakuppam, Cuddalore main road, Pondicherry Pondicherry PONDICHERRY |
9626199245
keerthigayam16@gmail.com |
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
Institutional Ethics Committee, Aravind Medical Research Foundation, Madurai |
Approved |
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
Modification(s)
|
Health Type |
Condition |
Patients |
(1) ICD-10 Condition: H408||Other glaucoma, Primary angle closure suspects undergoing laser peripheral iridotomy, |
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
Type |
Name |
Details |
Comparator Agent |
Nepafenac 0.1% topical eye drops, one drop 4 times/day for 7 days then 2 times/day for additional 7 days. Total duration 14 days. |
Non steroidal anti-inflammatory drug |
Intervention |
Prednisolone acetate 1% topical eye drops, one drop 4 times/day for 7 days then 2 times/day for additional 7 days. Total duration 14 days. |
Steroidal anti-inflammatory drug |
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
Age From |
40.00 Year(s) |
Age To |
70.00 Year(s) |
Gender |
Both |
Details |
1. Best corrected visual acuity 6/9 or more
2. Primary angle closure suspects |
|
ExclusionCriteria |
Details |
1. Corneal pathology
2. Significant cataract (obscuring undilated fundus view)
3. Intra ocular pressure more than 21 mm of Hg
4. Peripheral anterior synechiae
5. Glaucomatous optic neuropathy
6. History of use of topical or systemic steroids one month prior to laser iridotomy
7. History of use of topical or systemic NSAIDS one month prior to laser iridotomy |
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Computer generated randomization |
Method of Concealment
|
Sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes |
Blinding/Masking
|
Participant, Investigator and Outcome Assessor Blinded |
Primary Outcome
|
Outcome |
TimePoints |
To compare level of anterior chamber inflammation control between 0.1% Nepafenac and 1% Prednisolone acetate groups. |
2 weeks and 4 weeks post laser |
|
Secondary Outcome
|
Outcome |
TimePoints |
To compare the changes in IOP between 0.1% Nepafenac and 1% Prednisolone acetate groups. |
2 weeks and 4 weeks post laser |
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="152" Sample Size from India="152"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "152"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="152" |
Phase of Trial
|
Phase 4 |
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
11/08/2014 |
Date of Study Completion (India) |
27/01/2016 |
Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Date Missing |
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="1" Months="9" Days="7" |
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
|
Not Applicable |
Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Completed |
Publication Details
|
This study is NOT YET published in any journal. |
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
|
Brief Summary
|
This study is a randomized, double blind, parallel group trial comparing the safety and efficacy of topical 0.1% Nepafenac eye drops with topical 1% Prednisolone acetate eye drops in primary angle closure suspects undergoing Nd:YAG peripheral iridotomy conducted at one centre in India. The primary outcome measure was level of anterior chamber inflammation control at 2 and 4 weeks between the two groups. The secondary outcome measure was change in IOP at 2 and 4 weeks between the two groups.Results: 1. Both the groups were comparable in age and gender distribution. The higher number of females in study population is consistent with the finding that females are at higher risk for primary angle closure disease. 2. There was no significant difference in inflammation control between the two groups 3. The difference in mean IOP from baseline was significantly higher in Prednisolone group (p-value <0.001) at 2 weeks follow up where as it was insignificantly higher in Prednisolone group at 4weeks follow up. 4. Recurrent iritis was seen in 4 (5.8%) patients in Prednisolone group within 2 days after stopping steroid eye drops. 5. At 2 weeks, Nd:YAG iridotomy was repeated in 8 patients in Prednisolone group, but none in Nepafenac group needed repeat YAG iridotomy.
Conclusion: Topical Nepafenac 0.1% eye drop is as effective as topical Prednisolone acetate 1% eye drop in controlling inflammation after Nd:YAG peripheral iridotomy, with lesser side effects like intraocular pressure elevation, recurrent iritis and closure of iridotomy. |