| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2017/03/007988 [Registered on: 02/03/2017] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
06/11/2023 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
No |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Dentistry |
| Study Design |
Randomized, Parallel Group, Multiple Arm Trial |
|
Public Title of Study
|
A study to test different treatment options in patients with receding gums. |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
Comparison of platelet rich fibrin, periosteal pedicle graft and subepithelial connective tissue graft in treatment of Millers Class I &/or II gingival recession on multiple adjacent teeth- Randomized controlled trial. |
| Trial Acronym |
|
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
Dr Raghavendra S Medikeri |
| Designation |
Professor |
| Affiliation |
Sinhgad Dental College and Hospital |
| Address |
Sinhgad Dental College and Hospital, STEs campus, s.no 44/1, vadgaon Bk, off sinhgad road, pune, maharashtra, india STEs campus, s.no 44/1, vadgaon Bk, off sinhgad road, pune, maharashtra, india Pune MAHARASHTRA 411041 India |
| Phone |
9766337620 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
dr_raghum2000@yahoo.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Dr Raghavendra S Medikeri |
| Designation |
Professor |
| Affiliation |
Sinhgad Dental College and Hospital |
| Address |
Sinhgad Dental College and Hospital, STEs campus, s.no 44/1, vadgaon Bk, off sinhgad road, pune, maharashtra, india STEs campus, s.no 44/1, vadgaon Bk, off sinhgad road, pune, maharashtra, india Pune MAHARASHTRA 411041 India |
| Phone |
9766337620 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
dr_raghum2000@yahoo.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Dr Vinayak Meherwade |
| Designation |
Reader |
| Affiliation |
Sinhgad Dental College and Hospital |
| Address |
Sinhgad Dental College and Hospital, STEs campus, s.no 44/1, vadgaon Bk, off sinhgad road, pune, maharashtra, india. STEs campus, s.no 44/1, vadgaon Bk, off sinhgad road, pune, maharashtra, india Pune MAHARASHTRA 411001 India |
| Phone |
9422304567 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
drmvinayak@gmail.com |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
| Singad Dental College and Hospital, STEs campus, S.No 44/1, Vadgaon Bk, Off Sinhgad road, Pune, Maharashtra, India. |
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
Singad Dental College and Hospital |
| Address |
STEs campus, s.no 44/1, vadgaon Bk, off sinhgad road, pune, maharashtra, india |
| Type of Sponsor |
Research institution and hospital |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Dr Raghavendra S Medikeri |
Sinhgad Dental Hospital |
Room No; 04, Department of Periodontology, Surgical (Post-graduate) Section, S.no: 44/1, STES Campus, Vadgaon (Bk.), Off Sinhgad Road, Pune - 411041 Pune MAHARASHTRA |
9766337620
dr_raghum2000@yahoo.com |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| Institutional Ethical Committee |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Healthy Human Volunteers |
Systemically healthy participants in the age group of 18 years and above, having Miller class I and or II gingival recession on adjacent 2-3teeth and full mouth plaque score of 1 |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Intervention |
group 1: modified coronally positioned flap with platelet-rich fibrin |
modified coronally flap is elevated, platelet-rich-fibrin is place over the recession defect and flap positioned coronally and sutured |
| Intervention |
Group 2: Modified coronally positioned flap with Periosteal pedicle graft and platelet-rich-fibrin |
modified coronally flap is elevated beyond 4-5 mm apical to recession defects, periosteal flap is elevated bluntly from underlying bone. platelet-rich-fibrin is placed over denuded root surface and covered with periosteal pedicle graft over the recession defect. Both platelet-rich-fibrin and pedicle graft is secured with resorbable sutures |
| Intervention |
Group 2: Modified coronally positioned flap with Periosteal pedicle graft. |
modified coronally flap is elevated beyond 4-5 mm apical to recession defects, periosteal flap is elevated bluntly and reflected over the recession defect and secured with resorbable sutures. partial thickness flap positioned coronally and sutured. |
| Comparator Agent |
Group 3: Subepithelial connective tissue graft with coronally advanced flap. |
tension free Modified coronally flap is elevated on recepient sites. Connective tissue graft is harvested from palatal region of maxillary arch and transferred to recipient site covering entire denuded root surface. Partial thickness flap positioned coronally and sutured. |
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
18.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
60.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Both |
| Details |
1. Systemically healthy participants
2. Millers class I and or II gingival recession on adjacent two to three teeth.
3. Gingival recession depth of atleast one mm
4. Full mouth plaque score less than one.
5. Subjects willing to comply with the study related procedures.
6. Subjects willing to give written consent |
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
1. Medically compromised conditions that contraindicate periodontal surgery.
2. Subjects unable to perform routine oral hygiene procedure or poor patient patient compliance.
3. Pregnant or Lactating females.
4. Mucosal disorders at surgical sites. |
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Coin toss, Lottery, toss of dice, shuffling cards etc |
|
Method of Concealment
|
Centralized |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Participant and Outcome Assessor Blinded |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| to evaluate clinical root coverage, probing depth, clinical attachement level, attached ginigval gain and esthetic outcome obtained all methods. |
At baseline, post-operative 3 and 6 months |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| Patient comfort, complications suah as hematoma, pain, swelling, etc. |
during surgery and post- surgical upto 6 months. |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="60" Sample Size from India="60"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "24"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="24" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
Phase 2/ Phase 3 |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
15/03/2017 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
04/06/2018 |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Date Missing |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="2" Months="0" Days="0" |
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
Modification(s)
|
Not Applicable |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Completed |
Publication Details
Modification(s)
|
not published yet. |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
|
|
Brief Summary
|
Successful coverage of exposed root is necessary for esthetic and
functional reasons. A variety of surgical techniques have been used to cover
recession type defects. Subepithelial
connective tissue graft (SCTG) is considered gold standard for treatment of
gingival recession1,2,3. Modified coronally advanced flap (MCAF)
operation offers a
predictable, simple and
convenient approach as a root coverage procedure in Miller’s class I
and II recession defects.4 Combining this technique with addition of
platelet rich fibrin (PRF) improves outcomes like root coverage, amount of
gingival thickness and keratinized tissue width at surgical site5
Periosteum is a highly vascular connective tissue with immense
regenerative potential. It contain
fibroblasts & their progenitor
cells & stem cells. In all age groups, cells of periosteum retain ability
to differentiate into various types of cells. Recent studies
have shown that
periosteal pedicle graft
(PPG) resulted in increased root coverage, width of
attached gingival & keratinized gingiva.2,5
All those treatment
modalities give good result, with predictability of root coverage, widening of attached and keratinized gingiva.
To best of our knowledge, there is no study which compares PRF, PPG and SCTG in
the treatment of gingival recession. Hence, the purpose of this study is to compare clinical outcomes
of PRF, PPG and SCTG in treatment of miller’s class I & II gingival
recession in multiple adjacent teeth.
|