Aim
To compare the Clinical
Evaluation of Layered Zirconia and Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Disilicate
crowns in posterior and anterior restorations over a period of two years.
OBJECTIVES
To compare the survival rates in Layered
Zirconia and Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Disilicate crowns.
To compare the fracture resistance in
Layered Zirconia and Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Disilicate crowns.
To
compare the aesthetic performance in Layered Zirconia and
Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Disilicate crowns and
To compare the patient satisfaction of layered
zirconia vs. zirconia-reinforced lithium disilicate Zr-LD crowns in
posterior and anterior restorations over a 2 year period.
STUDY DESIGN
Type Prospective, triple-blind, randomized
controlled trial RCT
Participants 97 patients requiring single-unit posterior or
anterior crowns will be allocated randomly and allocation concealment will be
done.
Groups Group 1 Layered zirconia crowns zirconia core with
veneering ceramic
Group 2 Zirconia-reinforced lithium disilicate
monolithic crowns
Follow-up 6 months, 1 year, 2 years.
Inclusion Criteria
Adults (18–60 years) requiring
single-unit posterior or anterior crowns with written consent (Annexure I)
Adequate occlusal
clearance for material thickness
Good oral hygiene and
periodontal health
No history of parafunctional
habits (e.g., bruxism)
Exclusion Criteria
Severe bruxism or
clenching
Patients with gingivitis
and periodontitis
Heavy occlusal loads or
malocclusion
Patients with systemic
conditions affecting healing (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes,
osteoporosis)
History of allergic
reactions to ceramic materials
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes
Fracture/chipping rate of the crowns
Survival rate over the study period
Marginal adaptation and
retention
Secondary Outcomes
Patient satisfaction measured using a Visual Analog Scale
Colour stability and
translucency over time
Wear resistance and antagonist tooth wear
Periodontal health around restorations gingival index, plaque
index
METHODOLOGY
Sample
size calculation will be
done using Statulator, a sample calculator.
Sample size is 97 based on with 0.95 level of confidence, 0.5
expected proportion and 0.1 absolute value of margin of error.
Calibration and training of the observer will be done for reliability and validity of the
questionnaires
Pilot
study will be done on 10
percent of the total sample size
Patients
will be randomly assigned to receive either a layered zirconia or
a zirconia-reinforced lithium disilicate crown.
Patients, evaluators and
statistician will be blinded to the material used. The
prosthodontist performing the restorations will not be blinded due
to procedural requirements.
Allocation concealment Patients
will be allocated in two groups.
Clinical
Procedures
Standardized
tooth preparation (1.5–2.0 mm occlusal
reduction, chamfer margin)
Conventional
impressions recorded and compared
Crowns
cemented using standardized adhesive protocols
Follow-Up
Assessments:
At 6
months, 1 year, 2 years.
Evaluations
will include radiographic analysis, clinical examination,
and patient-reported outcomes |