| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2026/03/105696 [Registered on: 09/03/2026] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
09/03/2026 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
Yes |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Physiotherapy (Not Including YOGA) |
| Study Design |
Non-randomized, Active Controlled Trial |
|
Public Title of Study
|
Does Combining Jump Training and Mental Tasks Improve Reaction and Performance in University Basketball Players? |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
Effect of Plyometric Training Combined with Cognitive Motor Dual Task on Neuromuscular Efficiency, and Reactive Performance among University Basketball Players |
| Trial Acronym |
Nill |
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
Rahul Upadhyay |
| Designation |
MPT Student |
| Affiliation |
SRM College of Physiotherapy |
| Address |
room no PT09, 5th floor, SRM College of Physiotherapy, SRM institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur room no PT09, 5th floor, SRM College of Physiotherapy, SRM institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur Kancheepuram TAMIL NADU 603203 India |
| Phone |
7001033373 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
rupadhyaypt@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Mr Ashish Mathew A |
| Designation |
Assistant Professor |
| Affiliation |
SRM College of Physiotherapy |
| Address |
Pillayar Koil St, Potheri, SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur, Tamil Nadu Pillayar Koil St, Potheri, SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur, Tamil Nadu 603203 Kancheepuram TAMIL NADU 603203 India |
| Phone |
7397138762 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
ashishma@srmist.edu.in |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Mr Ashish Mathew A |
| Designation |
Assistant Professor |
| Affiliation |
SRM College of Physiotherapy |
| Address |
room no PT09, 5th floor, SRM College of Physiotherapy, SRM institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur room no PT09, 5th floor, SRM College of Physiotherapy, SRM institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur Kancheepuram TAMIL NADU 603203 India |
| Phone |
7397138762 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
ashishma@srmist.edu.in |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
Rahul Upadhyay |
| Address |
Pillayar Koil St, Potheri, SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur, Tamil Nadu 603203 |
| Type of Sponsor |
Other [self funded] |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Rahul Upadhyay |
Directorate of Sports |
room no. PT09, SRM Institute of Science and Technology
SRM College of Physiotherapy
Pillayar Koil St, Potheri, SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur, Tamil Nadu 603203 Kancheepuram TAMIL NADU |
7001033373
rupadhyaypt@gmail.com |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| SRM Medical College Hospital & Research Centre |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Healthy Human Volunteers |
18 to 25 years old men Basketball players with BMI range of 18 to 25 kg/m2 |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Intervention |
Plyometric + CMDT Training |
The intervention consists of a 6 weeks of progressive plyometric training program conducted three times per week (45–60 minutes/session) with standardized warm-up and cool-down. In Week 1, participants perform two-feet ankle jumps, onward skips, and double-leg vertical leaps (lower intensity). Week 2 includes two-feet ankle jumps, standing long jumps, sideways cone hops, and double-leg tuck jumps (lower to moderate intensity). Week 3 progresses to two-feet ankle hops, standing long jumps, sideways cone hops, double-leg tuck jumps, and double butt kicks (moderate intensity). Week 4 incorporates diagonal hops, double tuck jumps, lateral cone hops, double-leg butt kicks, and single-leg vertical jumps (moderate to higher intensity). Week 5 advances to diagonal cone hops, standing long jump with lateral sprint, lateral cone hops, single-leg bounding, front cone hops, and depth jumps (moderate to high intensity). Week 6 includes diagonal cone hops, hexagon drill, double-leg hops, lateral cone hops, and depth jumps (higher intensity).
For the experimental group, cognitive-motor dual tasks are integrated progressively each week, beginning with simple colour-based reaction drills (Week 1), followed by opposite-colour inhibitory tasks (Week 2), sequential visual cues (Week 3), Stroop-based conflict tasks (Week 4), reactive redirection drills (Week 5), and fully randomized decision-making cues simulating game-like unpredictability (Week 6). The control group performs the identical plyometric protocol without cognitive tasks, focusing solely on explosive execution and technique.
|
| Comparator Agent |
Plyometric exercise |
The intervention consists of a 6-week progressive plyometric training program conducted three times per week, with each session lasting 45–60 minutes including standardized warm-up and cool-down. In Week 1, participants perform two-feet ankle jumps, onward skips, and double-leg vertical leaps at lower intensity. Week 2 includes two-feet ankle jumps, standing long jumps, sideways cone hops, and double-leg tuck jumps at lower to moderate intensity. Week 3 progresses to two-feet ankle hops, standing long jumps, sideways cone hops, double-leg tuck jumps, and double butt kicks at moderate intensity. Week 4 incorporates diagonal hops, double tuck jumps, lateral cone hops, double-leg butt kicks, and single-leg vertical jumps at moderate to higher intensity. Week 5 advances to diagonal cone hops, standing long jump with lateral sprint, lateral cone hops, single-leg bounding, front cone hops, and depth jumps at moderate to high intensity. Week 6 includes diagonal cone hops, hexagon drill, double-leg hops, lateral cone hops, and depth jumps at higher intensity |
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
18.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
25.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Male |
| Details |
Only men Basketball players
Participants with BMI range of 18 to 25 kg/m2
University Basketball Players will be selected
Participants must have minimum of 2 years experience playing Basketball
|
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
Any history of neuromuscular disorder among the participants
Any lower limb or trunk injury among the participants
Any history of recent surgical procedure
Any history of medical disorders that effect cognitive process and task
Basketball players who already participated in another research study related to performance improvement
Participant’s dissatisfaction or unwillingness to perform the research process
|
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Not Applicable |
|
Method of Concealment
|
Not Applicable |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Not Applicable |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| EMG, RMS Frequency, MVIC% |
Baseline and at the end of 6th week intervention |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| Vertical jump test |
Baseline & at the end of 6th week intervention |
| Reaction Ability Test |
Baseline & at the end of 6th week intervention |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="34" Sample Size from India="34"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
N/A |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
21/04/2026 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="0" Months="3" Days="0" |
|
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
|
Not Applicable |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Not Yet Recruiting |
|
Publication Details
|
N/A |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
Response - NO
|
|
Brief Summary
|
Title: Effect of Plyometric Training Combined with Cognitive Motor Dual Task on Neuromuscular Efficiency and Reactive Performance among University Basketball Players Introduction: Basketball is a high-intensity intermittent sport requiring explosive movements such as sprinting, jumping, rapid direction changes, and quick decision-making. Vertical jump performance is a key determinant of offensive and defensive success and is influenced by neuromuscular efficiency, defined as the nervous system’s ability to recruit and coordinate motor units effectively. Plyometric training enhances neuromuscular efficiency by optimizing the stretch–shortening cycle; however, conventional protocols often neglect cognitive demands encountered during match play. Cognitive Motor Dual Task (CMDT) training integrates motor execution with cognitive challenges, potentially improving reaction time, attentional control, and neural processing efficiency. This study investigates the combined effect of plyometric training and CMDT on neuromuscular efficiency and reactive performance. Methodology: A quasi-experimental pre–post design was conducted among 34 male university basketball players (18–25 years) selected through convenient sampling. Participants were randomly allocated into an experimental group (plyometric training + CMDT) and a control group (traditional plyometric training). The intervention lasted six weeks, three sessions per week. Outcome measures included Reaction Ability Test, surface electromyography (EMG) assessing RMS amplitude, onset timing, and %MVIC for selected lower limb muscles, and Countermovement Jump (CMJ) test for vertical jump height. Neuromuscular efficiency was calculated as jump height divided by muscle activation (%MVIC). Data were analyzed using SPSS software. Results: The results will be revealed after completion of the study. Conclusion: The study aims to determine whether combining plyometric training with CMDT produces greater improvements in neuromuscular efficiency and reactive performance compared to traditional plyometric training among university basketball players. |